Research Article
Comparative modelling of two catchments in Taiwan and England
Yu-Chi Wang,
Dawei Han,
Pao-Shan Yu,
I. D. Cluckie,
Yu-Chi Wang
Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, No. 1, Ta-Hsueh Rd, Tainan, Taiwan 701, ROC
Search for more papers by this authorDawei Han
Water and Environmental Management Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Pao-Shan Yu
Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, No. 1, Ta-Hsueh Rd, Tainan, Taiwan 701, ROC
Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, No. 1, Ta-Hsueh Rd., Tainan, Taiwan 701, ROC.===Search for more papers by this authorI. D. Cluckie
Water and Environmental Management Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Search for more papers by this authorYu-Chi Wang,
Dawei Han,
Pao-Shan Yu,
I. D. Cluckie,
Yu-Chi Wang
Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, No. 1, Ta-Hsueh Rd, Tainan, Taiwan 701, ROC
Search for more papers by this authorDawei Han
Water and Environmental Management Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Pao-Shan Yu
Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, No. 1, Ta-Hsueh Rd, Tainan, Taiwan 701, ROC
Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, No. 1, Ta-Hsueh Rd., Tainan, Taiwan 701, ROC.===Search for more papers by this authorI. D. Cluckie
Water and Environmental Management Research Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
A comparative modelling of two catchments of similar sizes in Taiwan and England is described. In the study, despite its success in many Taiwanese catchments, including the Yan-Shui Creek catchment in this study, the distributed model GBDM was initially found unsuitable when applied to the Brue catchment in South West England. However, the simulations are much better after revising the infiltration capacity. Further exploration reveals several interesting findings. (1) The infiltration computation based on soil characteristics and classifications is unreliable in the model. Other factors, such as climate, farming practice and vegetation cover, could have a much more significant impact. (2) The application of the GBDM far away from its ‘home country’ unveils a possible weakness of such a model for being ‘underfitting’. The fact that an ‘adjustment factor’ added in the model could improve both its calibration and validation may indicate that there is a room to improve the GBDM structure for catchments outside Taiwan. (3) The study illustrates the difficulty in creating a universal distributed model that could suit all possible hydrological environments, under the constraint of model parameter parsimony to minimize the ‘equifinality’ problem. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- Anderton S, Latron M, Gallart F. 2002. Sensitivity analysis and multi-response, multi-criteria evaluation of a physically based distributed model. Hydrological Processes 16(2): 333–353.
- Aronica G, Bates PD, Horritt MS. 2002. Assessing the uncertainty in distributed model predictions using observed binary pattern information within GLUE. Hydrological Processes 16: 2001–2016.
- Bell VA, Moore RJ. 1998a. A grid-based distributed flood forecasting model for use with weather radar data: part 1. Formulation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2(2–3): 265–281.
10.5194/hess-2-265-1998 Google Scholar
- Bell VA, Moore RJ. 1998b. A grid-based distributed flood forecasting model for use with weather radar data: part 2. Case studies. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 2(2–3): 283–298.
- Beven K. 2001. Rainfall-Runoff Modeling: The Primer. Wiley: Hoboken, NJ.
- Beven K, Binley A. 1992. The future of distributed models—model calibration and uncertainty prediction. Hydrological Processes 6: 279–298.
- Bronstert A, Bardossy A. 2003. Uncertainty of runoff modelling at the hillslope scale due to temporal variations of rainfall intensity. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 28(6–7): 283–288.
- Bronstert A, Niehoff D, Burger G. 2002. Effects of climate and land-use change on storm runoff generation: present knowledge and modelling capabilities. Hydrological Processes 16: 509–529.
- Butts MB, Payne JT, Kristensen M, Madsen H. 2004. An evaluation of the impact of model structure on hydrological modelling uncertainty for streamflow simulation. Journal of Hydrology 298(1–4): 242–266.
- Calder IR. 1993. Hydrologic effects of land-use change. In Handbook of Hydrology, DR Maidment (ed). McGaw-Hill.
- Carpenter TM, Georgakakos KP. 2004. Impacts of parametric and radar rainfall uncertainty on the ensemble streamflow simulations of a distributed hydrologic model. Journal of Hydrology 298(1–4): 202–221.
- Christiaens K, Feyen J. 2002. Use of sensitivity and uncertainty measures in distributed hydrological modeling with an application to the MIKE SHE model. Water Resources Research 38(9): 1169.
- Chen CF. 2002. The study of non-point source pollution model at tea plantations. Masters thesis, Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, ROC.
- Chen SJ. 1997. Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of distributed rainfall-runoff model. Masters thesis, Department of Hydraulic and Ocean Engineering, National Cheng-Kung University, ROC.
- Duan QY, Sorooshian S, Gupta V. 1992. Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall-runoff models. Water Resources Research 28(4): 1015–1031.
- Duan QY, Gupta VK, Sorooshian S. 1993. Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications 76(3): 501–521.
- Duan QY, Sorooshian S, Gupta VK. 1994. Optimal Use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. Journal of Hydrology 158(3–4): 265–284.
- Eckhardt K, Arnold JG. 2001. Automatic calibration of a distributed catchment model. Journal of Hydrology 251(1–2): 103–109.
- Fortin J-P, Turcotte R, Massicotte S, Moussa R, Fitzback J, Villeneuve J-P. 2001a. Distributed watershed model compatible with remote sensing and GIS data. I: description of model. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 6(2): 91–99.
- Fortin J-P, Turcotte R, Massicotte S, Moussa R, Fitzback J, Villeneuve J-P. 2001b. Distributed watershed model compatible with remote sensing and GIS data. II: application to Chaudiere watershed. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 6(2): 100–108.
- Garrote L, Bras RL. 1995. A distributed model for real-time flood forecasting using digital elevation models. Journal of Hydrology 167(1–4): 279–306.
- Georgakakos KP, Seo DJ, Gupta H, Schaake J, Butts MB. 2004. Towards the characterization of streamflow simulation uncertainty through multimodel ensembles. Journal of Hydrology 298(1–4): 222–241.
- Guinot V, Gourbesville P. 2003. Calibration of physically based models: back to basics? Journal of Hydroinformatics 5(4): 233–244.
- Guo JZ, Liang X, Leung LR. 2004. Impacts of different precipitation data sources on water budgets. Journal of Hydrology 298(1–4): 311–334.
- Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Hogue TS, Boyle DP. 2003. Advances in automatic calibration of watershed models. In Calibration of Watershed Models, Q Duan, HV Gupta, S Sorooshian, AN Rousseau, R Turcotte (eds). Water Science and Application Series Volume 6. American Geophysical Union: Washington, DC; 9–28.
10.1029/WS006p0009 Google Scholar
- Liang X, Guo JZ, Leung LR. 2004. Assessment of the effects of spatial resolutions on daily water flux simulations. Journal of Hydrology 298(1–4): 287–310.
- Liu CW, Chen SK, Jou SW, Kuo SF. 2001. Estimation of the infiltration rate of a paddy field in Yun-Lin, Taiwan. Agricultural Systems 68(1): 41–54.
- Luo LF, Robock A, Vinnikov KY, Schlosser CA, Slater AG, Boone A, Braden H, Cox P, de Rosnay P, Dickinson RE, Dai YJ, Duan QY, Etchevers P, Henderson-Sellers A, Gedney N, Gusev YM, Habets F, Kim JW, Kowalczyk E, Mitchell K, Nasonova ON, Noilhan J, Pitman AJ, Schaake J, Shmakin AB, Smirnova TG, Wetzel P, Xue YK, Yang ZL, Zeng QC. 2003. Effects of frozen soil on soil temperature, spring infiltration, and runoff: results from the PILPS 2(d) experiment at Valdai, Russia. Journal of Hydrometeorology 4(2): 334–351.
- Madsen H. 2003. Parameter estimation in distributed hydrological catchment modelling using automatic calibration with multiple objectives. Advances in Water Resources 26(2): 205–216.
- Mitchell JFB, Warrilow DA. 1987. Summer dryness in northern mid-latitudes due to increased CO2. Nature 341: 132–134.
- Niehoff D, Fritsch U, Bronstert A. 2002. Land-use impacts on storm-runoff generation: scenarios of land-use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW-Germany. Journal of Hydrology 267(1–2): 80–93.
- Olivera F, Maidment D. 1999. Geographic information systems (GIS)-based spatially distributed model for runoff routing. Water Resources Research 35(4): 1155–1164.
- Pitman AJ, Slater AG, Desborough CE, Zhao M. 1999. Uncertainty in the simulation of runoff due to the parameterization of frozen soil moisture using the Global Soil Wetness Project methodology. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 104(D14): 16879–16888.
- Proffitt APB, Bendotti S, Howell MR, Eastham J. 1993. The effects of sheep trampling and grazing on soil physical properties and pasture growth for a red–brown earth. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 44: 317–331.
- Reed S, Koren V, Smith M, Zhang Z, Moreda F, Seo D-J, DMIP Participants. 2004. Overall distributed model intercomparison project results. Journal of Hydrology 298(1–4): 27–60.
- Senarath SUS, Ogden FL, Downer CW, Sharif HO. 2000. On the calibration and verification of two-dimensional, distributed, Hortonian, continuous watershed models. Water Resources Research 36(6): 1495–1510.
- Smith MB, Seo D-J, Koren VI, Reed S, Zhang Z, Duan Q-Y, Moreda F, Cong S. 2004a. The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): motivation and experiment design. Journal of Hydrology 298(1–4): 4–26.
- Smith MB, Koren VI, Zhang Z, Reed SM, Pan J-J, Moreda F. 2004b. Runoff response to spatial variability in precipitation: an analysis of observed data. Journal of Hydrology 298(1–4): 267–286.
- Storck P, Bowling L, Wetherbee P, Lettenmaier D. 1998. Application of a GIS-based distributed hydrology model for prediction of forest harvest effects on peak stream flow in the Pacific Northwest. Hydrological Processes 12: 889–904.
- Todini E. 1996. The ARNO rainfall-runoff model. Journal of Hydrology 175(1–4): 339–382.
- Vieux BE. 2001. Distributed Hydrologic Modeling Using GIS. Water Science and Technology Library, Vol. 38. Kluwer Academic: London, UK.
- Viessman WJ, Lewis GL, Knapp JW. 1989. Introduction to Hydrology, 3rd edition. Harper & Row: New York.
- Wang RY, Yi J. 1984. Applied Hydrology. National Institute of Translation and Compilation: Taiwan.
- Wooldridge S, Kalma J, Kuczera G. 2001. Parameterisation of a simple semi-distributed model for assessing the impact of land-use on hydrologic response. Journal of Hydrology 254(1–4): 16–32.
- Yen CL, Lin GF, Hsu MH, Huang LH. 1989. Design drainage and flood of Taipei mass rapid transit system. Technical Report of Hydrotech Research Institute, National Taiwan University.
- Yu PS, Jeng YC. 1997. A study on grid based distributed rainfall runoff model. Journal of Water Resource Management 11: 83–99.
- Yu PS, Yang TC, Chen SJ. 2001. Comparison of uncertainty analysis methods for a distributed rainfall-runoff model. Journal of Hydrology 244(1–2): 43–59.
- Yu PS, Wang YC, Kuo CC. 2004. Simulation of flow hydrographs at an ungauged site in Taiwan using a Windows-based distributed rainfall-runoff model. In International Congress, International Environmental Modelling and Software Society, Osnabrueck, Germany, June.
- Yu ZB, Schwartz FW. 1999. Automated calibration applied to watershed-scale flow simulations. Hydrological Processes 13: 191–209.
