Volume 7, Issue 2 e1850
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Open Access

The trend of mortality rates following hospitals downgrading and closures due to outbreak of COVID-19 in Fars province: A comparative cohort study

Mohammad Javad Fallahi

Mohammad Javad Fallahi

Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Department of Internal Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Contribution: Conceptualization, Resources

Search for more papers by this author
Sarvin Seifbehzad

Sarvin Seifbehzad

Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Contribution: Data curation, ​Investigation, Validation, Writing - original draft

Search for more papers by this author
Mehran Fereidooni

Mehran Fereidooni

Legal Medicine Research Center, Legal Medicine Organization, Tehran, Iran

Contribution: ​Investigation, Methodology, Resources

Search for more papers by this author
Amirmohammad Farrokhi

Amirmohammad Farrokhi

Trauma Research Center, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Contribution: Data curation, Formal analysis

Search for more papers by this author
Keivan Ranjbar

Keivan Ranjbar

Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Contribution: Supervision, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Reza Shahriarirad

Corresponding Author

Reza Shahriarirad

Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Correspondence Reza Shahriarirad, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Email: [email protected] and [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, ​Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 January 2024

Abstract

Background and Aims

Hospitals are one of the most important healthcare centers for providing the patients with different medical needs. Several different factors might cause hospitals to downgrade their services or departments or close down overall. One of the most multifaceted reasons for hospital downgrading or closure is infectious disease outbreaks. In this regard, we aimed to evaluate the effects of hospital closure and downgrading due to the COVID-19 pandemic on the mortality rate of the people residing in Fars province, Iran.

Methods

We gathered mortality information, including the cause of death, age, sex, place, and time of death of all deceased cases occurring during a period of 3 years, from February 20, 2018 to March 2021 from the forensic medicine and also the Department of Biostatistics in Shiraz University of Medical Sciences.

Results

A total of 71,331 deaths have been reported since 2018 through the first quarter of 2021, with 57.9% of total mortality cases attributed to male gender. The total mortality counts ranged from 4229 to 9809 deaths per quarter, from which the minimum rate was reported in the first quarter of 2018 and the maximum in the fourth quarter of 2020. Based on the causes of death, diseases of the circulatory system were shown to be the all-time most frequent cause of death, accounting for a total of 42.8% of recorded deaths, followed by neoplasms (9.77%) and diseases of the respiratory system (9.45%).

Conclusion

Although the large number of deaths at the time of the pandemic are immediately due to COVID-19 infection, deaths due to a notable number of other causes have had a significant increase which, along with the specific trend of place and causes of death, shows that the downgrading and closure of hospitals have had a significant impact on overall population mortality.

Key points

  • Several different causes with various natures might cause hospitals to downgrade their services or departments or close down overall, including the COVID-19 pandemic.

  • Although the large number of deaths at the time of the pandemic are immediately due to COVID-19 infection, deaths due to a notable number of other causes have had a significant increase which, along with the specific trend of place and causes of death, shows that the downgrading and closure of hospitals have had a significant impact on overall population mortality.

  • Evaluation of the long-term impact of hospital closure on disease-related mortalities should be continuously assessed, especially after the reopening of hospitals, to evaluate the significance of the impact of these imposed conditions.

1 INTRODUCTION

For centuries, healthcare policies and triage have been the backbone for medical treatment throughout the world; however, several events and situations of different natures may cause the hospitals to downgrade their activity, such as micropolitics, strikes, staff shortages, financial issues, excessive medical errors, or infectious disease outbreaks.1-6 From 2010 to 2015, there was an average of 21 hospital closures every year in the United States, with 47 closures in 2019 alone.7 These changes may only be limited to emergency care and emergent surgeries, or even hospitals close down altogether. These situations vary in significance and, therefore, the impact they have on the medical services and even the future of the hospital in terms of magnitude, nature, and the duration in which they take place.

In February 2020, as the outbreak of COVID-19 accelerated with uninterrupted transmission occurring in capital cities, the national government of Iran declared a state of emergency. They imposed strict measures designed to control the spread of the disease including mandatory hospitalization of suspected COVID-19 cases, closure of schools and markets, restriction of public gatherings, enforcement of “safe and hygienic burial,” and internal travel restrictions and border closures. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic financial strain on hospitals, the trend of closures accelerated, and it was anticipated that even more hospitals may close soon Association.8 Policymakers should thoroughly assess the repercussions and intelligently allocate budget to hospitals to lessen the negative effects of hospital closures.

The outbreak of COVID-19 would demand peak performance from medical professionals, especially in hospitals; however, many of the facilities that may be on the front lines were closed to prevent the spread of infection. On the other hand, many patients avoided referring to hospitals due to the risk of infection; this resulted in a significant decrease in hospital admissions. These newly faced situations called for an appropriate response and alterations in healthcare management.9 Patients' access to proper care could significantly be disturbed by hospital closures and this condition led to increased mortality rates due to delays in receiving treatment in many studies.10, 11 Several studies revealed that hospital closures were associated with a remarkable increase in deaths, especially from trauma and heart attacks.12-15 However, there are studies that found no association between hospital closures and mortality.16

During COVID-19 outbreak and hospital restrictions, a proper understanding of the impact of such condition is critical as they are likely to affect the delivery of health services. Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the impact of Fars province hospital closures on the mortality rate in southwestern Iran.

2 METHODS AND MATERIALS

2.1 Study design

This comparative cohort study aimed to detect the impact of closures and downgrading of Fars province hospitals on the mortality rate, which occurred due to concerns regarding the COVID-19 outbreak. The study setting of our study was Fars province, which is the fourth largest province in Iran with a population of 4,851,274 individuals (in 2016), and Shiraz, the capital of this province, has a population of 1,869,001 (the fifth most populated city in Iran). We obtained the mortality information, using data from the forensic medicine organization and the department of biostatistics from four major affiliated institutions in Fars province, consisting of Shiraz, Jahrom, Fasa, and Gerash Universities of Medical Sciences. Data were collected from February 20, 2020, to March 2021, which roughly consisted of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Fars province, along with similar data in the mentioned timeline but from 2018 to 2020 to be used for comparison. The inclusion criteria were all submitted death reports in Fars province, southern Iran, and the exclusion criteria included transferred cases from other provinces for further investigations. The information and death certificate of each case were reviewed, and their demographic features were obtained from their files including the cause of death, age, sex, date, and place of death.

2.2 Data collection and curation

Causes of death were gathered based on International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, (ICD-10) codes and then recategorized using the ICD-10 chapter titles, with an additional focus on COVID-19 infection (Table 1). Causes of death were reported in sequels of four, from the initial cause to the ultimate one. The initial cause of death was gathered and labeled as the “Beginning Cause of Death (BCOD)” since it starts the causal chain of mortality, and the ultimate cause of death was labeled “Immediate Cause of Death (ICOD).” The gathered data were reported in two methods: quarterly deaths reported and binary categories before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. To determine which causes of death were rather significant in starting the circumstances leading to death, we divided total count of the BCOD by immediate ones of the same cause. This ratio shows whether a cause of death is more directly responsible for mortality if its value is less than 1 and vice versa if it is more than 1. The age of our cases were categorized into seven groups, including infants (up to 1 year old), children (1−12 years old), teens (13−18 years old), young adults (19−25 years old), middle-aged adults (26−45 years old), senior adults (46−65 years old), and old age (over 65 years old). The place of death of our cases was categorized into two main groups, including inpatient deaths (death in a healthcare center or hospital) and outpatient deaths (deaths occurring in places other than healthcare centers).

Table 1. Categorization of diseases based on ICD10-code.
# Chapter ICD-10 code
0 Missing -
1 Certain infectious and parasitic diseases A00-B99
2 Neoplasms C00-D49
3 Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism D50-D89
4 Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases E00-E89
5 Mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental disorders F01-F99
6 Diseases of the nervous system G00-G99
7 Diseases of the eye and adnexa H00-H59
8 Diseases of the ear and mastoid process H60-H95
9 Diseases of the circulatory system I100-I99
10 Diseases of the respiratory system J00-J99
11 Diseases of the digestive system K00-K95
12 Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue L00-L99
13 Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue M00-M99
14 Diseases of the genitourinary system N00-N99
15 Pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium O00-O9A
16 Certain conditions originating in the perinatal period P00-P96
17 Congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities Q00-Q99
18 Symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified R00-R99
19 Injury, poisoning, and certain other consequences of external causes S00-T88
20 Codes for special purposes U00-U85
21 External causes of morbidity (i.e., motor vehicle accidents, assault, and self-harm) V00-Y99
22 Factors influencing health status and contact with health services Z00-Z99
23 COVID-19 U07.1-U07.2

2.3 Data analyses

The collected data were entered into Excel 2021 (Microsoft Software) and SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Software) software and evaluated for normality using the Kolmogorov−Smirnov normality test. After data cleansing, we analyzed and reported the results, using frequency and percentage distribution diagrams for descriptive indicators and mean and standard deviation for numerical values.

3 RESULTS

3.1 Overall mortality trends and features

A total of 67,867 deaths were reported in Fars province, Iran, from 2018 to the first quarter of 2021, with 57.8% of total mortalities attributed to male gender. Mortalities reported in this time span had an upper age-border of 105 with an average of 66.6 ± 22.7 years. Total mortality counts ranged from 2164 to 9809 deaths per quarter, from which the minimum was reported in the first quarter of 2020 and the maximum in the fourth quarter of 2020 (Table 2). The mortality rate in the cities in our province, based on the geographic information map, are demonstrated in Figure 1, while the trend of mortalities throughout the period of our study is displayed in Figure 2.

Table 2. Frequency and changes of mortality based on timeline and quarterly (Q), half-year, and full-year categorization (N = 70,980).
Year Total, n (%) Half year Quarterly
First Second Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
2018 18,970 (26.59) 9029 (12.66) 9941 (13.94) 4229 (5.93) 4800 (6.73) 4771 (6.69) 5170 (7.25)
2019 20,686 (29) 10,174 (14.26) 10,512 (14.74) 5220 (7.32) 4954 (6.95) 4863 (6.82) 5649 (7.92)
2020 26,858 (37.65) 10,494 (14.71) 16,364 (22.94) 5300 (7.43) 5194 (7.28) 6548 (9.18) 9816 (13.76)
2021 - - - 4817 (6.75) - - -
Details are in the caption following the image
Geographic information map based on the total death counts by cities in Fars province from February 2018 till March 2021 (Shiraz is the capital of the province).
Details are in the caption following the image
Frequency of mortality in Fars province, Southwestern Iran (*indicator of the start of the COVID-19 pandemic).

The gender distribution among the two genders remained roughly unchanged with an average of 57.9% of deaths attributed to males, and a quarterly range of 56.2%−59.5%. Comparison of the impact of gender based on male-to-female ratio showed that in the category codes “Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic disorders,” “Congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities,” “Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue,” “Certain conditions originating in the perinatal period,” and “Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue” had a more impactful role in female mortality rates (Table 3).

Table 3. Distribution of mortality based on the cause and gender.
ICD code Code Frequency (%) Male/female (ratio) BCOD BCOD/ICOD
9 Diseases of the circulatory system 30,531 (42.80) 16,437/14,094 (1.17) 27,841 0.91
2 Neoplasms 6969 (9.77) 3998/2971 (1.35) 8772 1.26
10 Diseases of the respiratory system 6739 (9.45) 3956/2783 (1.42) 4594 0.68
21 External causes of morbidity 6434 (9.02) 5086/1348 (3.77) 7572 1.18
18 Symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified 4057 (5.69) 2566/1491 (1.72) 4268 1.05
1 Certain infectious and parasitic diseases 3570 (5.00) 1933/1637 (1.18) 1289 0.36
23 COVID-19 infection 3203 (4.49) 1892/1311 (1.44) 5040 1.57
0 Missing 2106 (2.95) 1183/923 (1.28) 2106 1.00
14 Diseases of the genitourinary system 1754 (2.46) 926/828 (1.12) 1753 1.00
11 Diseases of the digestive system 1604 (2.25) 969/635 (1.53) 1899 1.18
6 Diseases of the nervous system 1129 (1.58) 602/527 (1.14) 1503 1.33
4 Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases 965 (1.35) 446/519 (0.86) 2280 2.36
19 Injury, poisoning, and certain other consequences of external causes 576 (0.81) 448/128 (3.50) 206 0.36
5 Mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental disorders 470 (0.66) 339/131 (2.59) 639 1.36
17 Congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities 376 (0.53) 176/200 (0.88) 469 1.25
16 Certain conditions originating in the perinatal period 328 (0.46) 124/204 (0.61) 342 1.04
3 Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism 270 (0.38) 142/128 (1.11) 248 0.92
12 Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue 145 (0.20) 66/79 (0.84) 207 1.43
13 Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue 72 (0.10) 22/50 (0.44) 233 3.24
15 Pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium 25 (0.04) 0/25 (0.00) 33 1.32
22 Factors influencing health status and contact with health services 6 (0.01) 5/1 (5.0) 35 5.83
8 Diseases of the ear and mastoid process 1 (0.00) 1/0 (0) 2 2.00
20 Codes for special purposes 1 (0.00) 0/1 (0) 0 0.00
7 Diseases of the eye and adnexa 0 (0.00) 0/0 (0) 0 N/A
  • Note: Cause of death are described as the beginning cause of death (BCOD) since it starts the causal chain of mortality, and the ultimate cause of death is labeled “immediate cause of death (ICOD).”
  • Abbreviation: ICD-10, International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision.

The BCOD/ICOD ratio based on our data is reported in Table 3; as demonstrated, diseases of the circulatory system and the respiratory system showed a ratio of 0.91 and 0.63 respectively, indicating that these causes of death were more an ultimate cause. COVID-19 and neoplasms had a ratio greater than 1, implying that these causes rather began the circumstance that led to death.

3.2 Time trend of causes of mortality

Based on the causes of death, diseases of the circulatory system were the all-time most frequent cause, accountable for a total of 42.9% of deaths recorded, followed by neoplasms (9.82%) and diseases of the respiratory system (9.44%). The rank of diseases of the circulatory system was unchanged through all quarters in this study. Other causes, however, showed a variation, with neoplasms being the second overall but changing to being the third due to external causes of morbidity in the third quarter of 2018; also, after the first quarter of 2020, they were replaced by external causes of mortality, COVID-19 infection, and respiratory diseases. The third overall ICOD was diseases of the respiratory system, which had become more prominent since the first quarter of 2020. External causes of morbidity which included motor vehicle accidents, assault, and self-harm were the fourth most frequently reported ICOD, with a drop in frequency in the third and fourth quarters of 2020. Injury, poisoning, and certain other consequences of other causes showed a slight rise in rate in the first quarter of 2020. Deaths due to pregnancy and childbirth had a total number of 22 in the course of this study, with a maximum of six deaths in the first quarter of 2019. The overall causes of mortality are demonstrated in Figure 3, and their ranking throughout the period of our study is illustrated in Figure 4.

Details are in the caption following the image
Frequency of causes of death in Fars province, Southwestern Iran from February 2018 till March 2021.
Details are in the caption following the image
Ranking of the cause of death among various age groups in Fars, Iran from February 2018 to March 2021.

3.3 Mortality trend based on age groups

The mortality rate increased gradually with age, from 1.6% of deaths in the infant category to 61.1% in old age (Table 4). Observations across age categories and causes of death showed worrying facts, especially in the teen and young adult age category. In the infant age category, the main causes of death were the conditions originating in the perinatal period and congenital malformations as expected, representing 51.4% of total deaths in the infancy period. Diseases of the respiratory and circulatory systems follow afterward, being accountable for 8.9% and 7.4% of infantile deaths, respectively.

Table 4. Distribution and changes of mortality based on quartile among age groups.
Age group (years) Total (%) 2018 2019 2020 2021
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1
Infant (<1) 1146 (1.61) 85 112 77 97 98 107 108 111 102 53 77 74 45
Change (%) 31.76 −31.25 25.97 1.03 9.18 0.93 2.78 −8.11 −48.04 45.28 −3.90 −39.19
Child (1–12) 1227 (1.72) 87 108 94 103 89 100 114 113 70 88 103 97 61
Change (%) 24.14 −12.96 9.57 −13.59 12.36 14.00 −0.88 −38.05 25.71 17.05 −5.83 −37.11
Teen (13–18) 919 (1.29) 68 60 65 47 60 71 70 74 73 104 91 69 67
Change (%) −11.76 8.33 −27.69 27.66 18.33 −1.41 5.71 −1.35 42.47 −12.50 −24.18 −2.90
Young adult (19–25) 1576 (2.21) 103 157 144 113 110 87 117 117 166 116 132 134 80
Change (%) 52.43 −8.28 −21.53 −2.65 −20.91 34.48 0.00 41.88 −30.12 13.79 1.52 −40.30
Middle-aged adult (26 – 45) 7460 (10.46) 447 566 624 575 508 544 525 540 569 594 687 779 502
Change (%) 26.62 10.25 −7.85 −11.65 7.09 −3.49 2.86 5.37 4.39 15.66 13.39 −35.56
Senior adult (46–65) 15,251 (21.38) 857 1024 999 1103 1127 1034 954 1214 1060 1127 1493 2203 1056
Change (%) 19.49 −2.44 10.41 2.18 −8.25 −7.74 27.25 −12.69 6.32 32.48 47.56 −52.07
Old age (>65) 43,752 (61.34) 2582 2773 2768 3132 3228 3011 2975 3480 3260 3112 3965 6460 3006
Change (%) 7.40 −0.18 13.15 3.07 −6.72 −1.20 16.97 −6.32 −4.54 27.41 62.93 −53.47

In the child age category, external causes of mortality followed by diseases of the circulatory and respiratory systems were the top three causes of death with 31.7%, 10.4%, and 8.3% of total deaths. Neoplasms follow these three causes and continue to be a rather prominent cause of death in all age categories except infants. Diseases of the nervous system and “symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified” are as prevalent as neoplasms in the child age group, each accounting for 6.2% of total deaths.

In the teenage category, a similar pattern with younger age groups was observed, with almost the same causes being responsible for the highest number of deaths. External causes of mortality constituted a rate of 53% of all deaths reported, while diseases of the circulatory system comprised 9.7%. “Symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified” were in the third rank, with a rate of 7.6%. A notable fact is that the teenage category constituted the least number of mortalities reported amongst age categories, with 872 deaths out of a total of 67,867 (1.2%).

External causes of mortality remained to be the first cause of death in the young adult age range with a high margin (56.8%), followed by “symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified” (11%) and diseases of the circulatory system (10.7%). Diseases of the circulatory system ranked second to external causes of mortality in middle-aged adults. From this age range, a gradual rise was observed in death counts due to diseases of the circulatory system, contributing to 16.5% of deaths. External causes of mortality, however, made up 33.2% of deaths, still being the first. “Symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified” came third with almost the same rate as younger age categories (11.4%), and death due to neoplasms started to become considerably more since this age (9%). All deaths due to pregnancy and childbirth occurred in middle-aged women. Senior adults and people of old age contributed the most to the overall ranking of causes of death, in such a manner that the mortality rate exceeded the total sum of all younger age groups (14,627 and 41,497 vs. 11,743 deaths, respectively). Diseases of the circulatory system was the leading cause of death with a rate of 36.8% and 53.2% in senior adults and old age adults, respectively. Neoplasms was the second, with the highest rank in all age categories and 16.2% of deaths in senior adults. Diseases of the respiratory system were in the third rank, with 9.1% of deaths. Following closely was external causes of mortality with a rate of 8.6%. The second rank amongst the old age population belonged to the diseases of the respiratory system, with a rate of 10.5%, which illustrates a wide gap of 17,726 death counts (42.7%) with the previous cause. The third cause of death was neoplasms which caused the highest number of deaths compared to other age categories (3490 deaths), still having a lesser rate of 8.4%. Deaths due to external causes of mortality showed a sharp drop to only 735% or 1.7%. However, infectious, and parasitic diseases were the fourth most common cause of death in people older than 65 years old. There was also a notable 98% decrease in the cause of death labeled as missing throughout this time (Figure 4).

3.4 Impact of COVID-19 on mortality

Since its first report in February 2020, COVID-19 had a major role in increasing the quarterly reported mortality rates, being the second cause of death reported in the third and fourth quarters of 2020 and seventh in the early 2020 and 2021. COVID-19 was first reported in China on December 31, 2019, while the first case in Iran was in Qom city on February 19, 2020; then, it took 12 days for the first case to be reported in Fars in Shiraz. Since then, COVID-19 had a prominent role in mortality rates in Fars province. Being responsible for a cumulative count of 3162 deaths (4.6%), COVID-19 has had an impact on causes of death, rapidly replacing other causes of death. To evaluate this more thoroughly, deaths were divided into two categories based on the pandemic, as mentioned in the method section, and total deaths before and after it were divided according to the number of quarters each part endured, to better show the impact COVID-19 had on Fars province mortalities. We explored this starting with diseases of the circulatory system that had a total count of 17,247 deaths over the course of eight quarters before the COVID-19 pandemic. This shows an average of 2155.8 deaths per quarter, where afterward the sum is 11,851 in five quarters, and the average increases to 2370.2 per quarter. The per-quarter average of the top 10 causes of mortality and their changes before and after the COVID-19 era is illustrated in Table 5 and Figure 5. What can be inferred from this illustration is that COVID-19 infection and other diseases of the respiratory system had a sharp increase in quarterly average deaths and replace neoplasms and external causes of mortality. Other causes of mortality, however, only show an increase by one in rank caused by COVID-19.

Table 5. Top 10 causes of death based on the COVID-19 pandemic timeline.
ICD code Code Before COVID-19 During COVID-19 Total
Total Average Rank Inpatient Outpatient total Average Rank Inpatient Outpatient
9 Diseases of the circulatory system 17,345 2168.13 1 7751 9594 13186 2637.20 1 4925 8261 30,531
2 Neoplasms 4563 570.38 2 2600 1963 2406 481.20 4 1002 1404 6969
10 Diseases of the respiratory system 3204 400.50 4 1883 1321 3535 707.00 2 2650 885 6739
21 External causes of morbidity 4040 505.00 3 1600 2440 2394 478.80 5 1035 1359 6434
18 Symptoms, signs, and abnormal clinical and laboratory findings, not elsewhere classified 2153 269.13 5 866 1287 1904 380.80 6 790 1114 4057
1 Certain infectious and parasitic diseases 1717 214.63 7 1248 469 1853 370.60 7 1302 551 3570
23 COVID-19 infection 0 0.00 23 0 0 3203 640.60 3 2920 283 3203
0 Missing 1891 236.38 6 776 1115 215 43.00 14 99 116 2106
14 Diseases of the genitourinary system 1103 137.88 8 652 451 651 130.20 8 369 282 1754
11 Diseases of the digestive system 1048 131.00 9 775 273 556 111.20 9 364 192 1604
6 Diseases of the nervous system 656 82.00 10 294 362 473 94.60 10 170 303 1129
4 Endocrine, nutritional, and metabolic diseases 597 74.63 11 346 251 368 73.60 11 159 209 965
19 Injury, poisoning, and certain other consequences of external causes 282 35.25 12 128 154 294 58.80 12 172 122 576
5 Mental, behavioral, and neurodevelopmental disorders 254 31.75 14 82 172 216 43.20 13 80 136 470
17 Congenital malformations, deformations, and chromosomal abnormalities 266 33.25 13 188 78 110 22.00 17 81 29 376
16 Certain conditions originating in the perinatal period 217 27.13 15 188 29 111 22.20 15 88 23 328
3 Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs and certain disorders involving the immune mechanism 159 19.88 16 139 20 111 22.20 15 90 21 270
12 Diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue 88 11.00 17 34 54 57 11.40 18 10 47 145
13 Diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue 46 5.75 18 21 25 26 5.20 19 16 10 72
15 Pregnancy, childbirth, and the puerperium 19 2.38 19 14 5 6 1.20 20 3 3 25
22 Factors influencing health status and contact with health services 6 0.75 20 3 3 0 0.00 21 0 0 6
8 Diseases of the ear and mastoid process 1 0.13 21 1 0 0 0.00 21 0 0 1
20 Codes for special purposes 1 0.13 21 1 0 0 0.00 21 0 0 1
7 Diseases of the eye and adnexa 0 0.00 23 0 0 0 0.00 21 0 0 0
Details are in the caption following the image
Ranking of causes of death from 2018 to 2021 in Fars province, Iran.

4 DISCUSSION

This study aimed to evaluate the mortality rate during hospital downgrading due to the COVID-19 pandemic and compare it with the same previous time frames. Before the pandemic, the crude death rate had a relatively steady trend, ranging from 1601 to 1978 in each month. After the onset of the pandemic in every peak, which brought about general lockdowns and stricter regulations, monthly mortality rates had a significant increase, reaching 4421 in November 2020 during the very strict transportation regulations, which is more than twice the mortality rates before the pandemic and lockdowns.

The first COVID-19 peak started in the middle of the first quarter of 2020 and lasted until the middle of the second quarter of 2020. The last month of the second quarter of 2020 was the second peak, and the fourth quarter of 2020 was roughly the third peak of COVID-19 in Iran. Although after the second peak, the slope in the mortality diagram was relatively lower for a short period of time, the mortality trend continued to rise. In the third peak, mortality and its trend reached an all-time high, so that in the middle of the fourth quarter, monthly mortality reached a rate higher than 2.7 times the mean mortality rate in the period before the pandemic.

As we demonstrated in the COVID-19 statistics in our results, we experienced three peaks during our study period, and there was a shift from inpatient COVID-19 to outpatient management of the disease. The statistics regarding COVID-19 deaths are most probably under-reported, due to a lack of reporting possibly caused by stigma, fear of compulsory quarantine for relatives, hospital expenses or neglect, and a genuine under-reporting caused by the lack of documented evidence of COVID-19 infection. This has also been stated by official reports and would mean that a notable proportion of COVID-19-related deaths have been registered as other causes, suggesting that the massive increase in non-COVID-19 deaths might be partly due to these reasons.

The mortality trend was on the rise during the pandemic and lockdowns; although the mortality rate had a steady trend in the 26 months before the pandemic, it ascended during the 13-month pandemic period by 33%, compared to the mean crude death rate in previous periods. Considering the increase in non-COVID-19 deaths in this period, it can be argued that the lockdowns and downregulations have a negative impact on the mortality rate. Another attributing factor could be the fear of seeking medical care at the time of the pandemic.

The three main causes of death in patients before and during the pandemic are diseases of the circulatory system, neoplasms, and diseases of the respiratory system. With the onset of the pandemic, mortality increased in most causes of death. Although COVID-19 has become the second most common cause of death in two quarters and death due to respiratory diseases has increased, the rise in mortality rate is not solely due to these two reasons. The highest death rate due to COVID-19 was in November 2020 with 1084 deaths, making up 24.51% of the total deaths.

Deaths due to neoplasms had a drastic drop at the beginning of the pandemic, but as time went by, it returned to its previous trend. It might be possible that this temporary decrease in the number of deaths due to neoplasms is because of fewer admissions of cancer patients at the beginning of the pandemic and the delay in treatments like chemotherapy and surgical treatments.

The third overall ICOD was diseases of the respiratory system, which have become more prominent since the first quarter of 2020. This increase could be linked to cases of undiagnosed COVID-19, especially at the beginning of the pandemic, due to the lack of accurate diagnostic tests. On the other hand, deaths related to the digestive and genitourinary systems and injury/poisoning showed a decrease at the time of the pandemic, except for the first quarter of 2020 which witnessed a rise in deaths by injury/poisoning, due to a surge in methanol poisonings.

Analyses of BCOD/ICOD show that COVID-19, like neoplasms, is mostly the initiator of the cascade that results in death. On the other hand, diseases of the circulatory system, diseases of the respiratory system, and certain infections have ratio values less than 1, which shows they are mostly the ultimate cause of death.

Among the other published reports on the applied policies and downgrading, one case was mentioned from a private transplant referral hospital in our province.9 The main findings demonstrated that the COVID-19 pandemic had a discernible impact in terms of postponing surgery and raising hospital expenses and workload. However, by implementation of proper policies, early diagnosis for COVID-19, and application of the required treatment and preventative protocols to protect the patients, the center was able to deliver satisfactory medical services for patients and limit the spread of infection.9 In a report from the New York hospitals in the United States, the result of the collaboration across private, public, community, and federal hospital systems was able to develop multiple strategies for communication, surge capacity, clinical guidelines, and staff wellness during the COVID-19 pandemic.17 However, Shi et al. from Korea state that while tertiary hospitals are crucial for treating both COVID-19 patients and patients without the virus, hospital staff must safeguard themselves against unforeseen in-hospital transmission. For safeguarding tertiary hospitals and their staff during the COVID-19 epidemic, a comprehensive response must be implemented.18 This can also be evident in the reports in Iran as well, demonstrating a high rate of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers.19, 20 Through applying proper hospital policies, better management of healthcare workers can be achieved to avoid high exposure and burnout during these stressful circumstances. However, these policies should be assessed from a broader viewpoint while considering the impact of hospital downgrading and closure on the overall mortality rates and concurring events. These applied implantations, although imperfect, should be evaluated in various settings to provide experience and data for future policymakers. There are few similar studies conducted at the time of the pandemic. In South Korea, a study showed an increase in inpatient mortality any time there was an emergency department closure. These findings are in the same line with those of our study.21

Chronic kidney disease patients who were followed and evaluated in India showed a significant increase in morbidity and mortality due to limited or delayed access to dialysis services. In our study, dialysis patients were not separately assessed, but deaths due to diseases of the genitourinary system were shown to have a decreasing trend which might be due to a difference in healthcare systems in Iran and India; for example, there are dialysis units which are not strictly dependent on hospitals in Iran, which provide the chronic kidney disease patients with care, so their sessions are not delayed at the times of hospital downgrading.22

There are some limitations in our study. First, since downgrading and hospital closure and corresponding events have been rarely reported in the literature; also, in our country we were unable to compare our implanted policies and outcomes with other similar events, thus making our report merely descriptive for future policymakers. Another limitation is that we were unable to assess the financial burden and other aspects of hospital downgrading and closure, which could all affect the implementation of these measures. Although our study focused on a vital aspect, which was the mortality rates, aside from providing data on the results and burden of the COVID-19 pandemic and applied measures, we were able to evaluate the frequency and trends in mortality rates in our country.

5 CONCLUSION

Hospital closure due to the COVID-19 pandemic has had a major effect on mortality rates, while also affecting the trend of mortality along with the admission status in Fars province. However, long-term evaluation after the reopening of hospitals is warranted to evaluate the exact effect of these imposed conditions. Evaluation of the long-term impact of hospital closure on disease-related mortalities should be continuously assessed to better determine the depths of the impact of such conditions. On the other hand, due to different outcomes in certain specific fields with other countries, further comparisons of the impact of hospital closure policies in Iran with other countries and also evaluation of the effect of different imposed policies during hospital closure on mortality rates would be beneficial in reaching a better cost–benefit ratio and optimization of such policies.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Mohammad Javad Fallahi: Conceptualization; resources. Sarvin Seifbehzad: Data curation; investigation; validation; writing—original draft. Mehran Fereidooni: Investigation; methodology; resources. Amirmohammad Farrokhi: Data curation; formal analysis. Keivan Ranjbar: Supervision; writing—review and editing. Reza Shahriarirad: Conceptualization; data curation; formal analysis; investigation; methodology; project administration; supervision; writing—review and editing.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The study was the subject of the MD dissertation of Sarvin Seif Behzad (Project number 99-01-106-22128). The authors would like to thank Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran and the Center for Development of Clinical Research of Nemazee Hospital and Dr. Nasrin Shokrpour for editorial assistance.

    CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

    The authors declare no conflict of interest.

    ETHICS STATEMENT

    The present study was approved by the medical ethics committee of the academy (Ethical Code: IR.SUMS.REC.1399.091). The permission was obtained from the medical ethics committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Based on the retrospective nature of our study, written informed consent was waived by the Ethics committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, and their information was obtained from their hospital records. Permission to carry out the study and access patient records was sought from the Shiraz University of Medical Science authorities; the study was conducted in compliance with the relevant guidelines and regulations and the Declaration of Helsinki and was also approved by the ethics committee of the university.

    TRANSPARENCY STATEMENT

    The lead author Reza Shahriarirad affirms that this manuscript is an honest, accurate, and transparent account of the study being reported; that no important aspects of the study have been omitted; and that any discrepancies from the study as planned (and, if relevant, registered) have been explained.

    DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

    SPSS data of the participants can be requested from the authors.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.