Volume 39, Issue S2
SUPPLEMENT ABSTRACT
Free Access

RELAPSES IN INTERIM PET NEGATIVE LIMITED STAGE HODGKIN LYMPHOMA PATIENTS RECEIVING ABVD WITH OR WITHOUT RADIOTHERAPY–ANALYSIS OF EORTC/FIL/LYSA H10 AND UK NCRI RAPID TRIALS

I. Aurer

I. Aurer

University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia

Search for more papers by this author
A. Neven

A. Neven

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Lymphoma Group, Brussels, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
V. Fiaccadori

V. Fiaccadori

University College London, Cancer Institute, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
N. Counsell

N. Counsell

University College London, Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
E. Phillips

E. Phillips

University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
L. Clifton-Hadley

L. Clifton-Hadley

University College London, Cancer Research UK and University College London Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
C. Fortpied

C. Fortpied

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Lymphoma Group, Brussels, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
M. Andre

M. Andre

Université Catholique de Louvain, Department of Hematology, Yvoir, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
M. Federico

M. Federico

University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, CHIMOMO Department, Modena, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
S. Barrington

S. Barrington

King's College London, King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
T. Illidge

T. Illidge

University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
J. Radford

J. Radford

University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
J. Raemaekers

J. Raemaekers

Radboud University Medical Centre, Department of Hematology, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 June 2021

Introduction: Randomized trials H10 and RAPID were designed to assess whether radiotherapy (RT) can be safely omitted in newly diagnosed limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients who are interim PET-negative (iPETneg) after 2 (H10) or 3 (RAPID) cycles of ABVD. Despite differences in inclusion criteria and treatment, in both studies relapses were more frequent after chemotherapy only (C) than after combined modality treatment (C+RT), even in iPETneg patients. A recent exploratory analysis of the H10 study showed that most relapses after C occurred in the first 2 years after treatment (early relapses) and were observed in initially involved areas. Male sex and stage II were negative prognostic factors in H10. We sought to confirm these findings in the independent data set of the RAPID trial.

Patients and Methods: Patients enrolled in the RAPID trial were assigned retrospectively to a favorable (F) or unfavorable (U) prognostic group according to the EORTC/GELA criteria. First, the timing and site of relapses were analyzed descriptively in the F group. The low number of relapses in the U group prevented a reliable comparison with the H10 counterpart. Next, RAPID (F+U groups) was analyzed with a Cox model adjusted for age, sex and stage to estimate the treatment hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Finally, H10 and RAPID (F+U groups) were combined in a Cox model stratified by study, with a different HR before and after 2 years.

Results: Patient numbers, group allocation and outcomes are presented in table 1. In the RAPID F group, relapses after C occurred within 2 years in 11 patients and after that in 2; and after C+RT in 2 and 4 patients, respectively. Relapses after C occurred only in initially involved areas in 6 patients, only in uninvolved areas in 2 and in both in 5; and after C+RT, in 1, 2 and 3 patients, respectively. In RAPID (F+U groups), the effect of gender and stage went in the same direction as in H10 but was non-significant. In the combined analysis, the hazard of relapses was significantly lower after C+RT than after C during the first 2 years (HR = 0.20, 95% CI = (0.11, 0.37)) but similar from 2 years onwards (HR = 0.84, 95%CI = (0.41, 1.69)). The fitted model showed a significant prognostic effect of gender (worse prognosis for males) and stage (worse prognosis for stage II), mainly driven by H10.

Conclusions: The independent validation with RAPID and the combined analysis confirm the H10 finding that omitting RT in iPET neg. patients treated with C results in an increase in early relapses. Moreover, in both studies, relapses after C were more frequently confined to initially involved areas alone.

TABLE 1. Number, group allocation and outcome of patients randomized in the H10 and RAPID trials
F U Unclassified
  C+RT C C+RT C C+RT C
H10 randomized 227 238 292 302 0 0
relapsed 2 (1%) 30 (13%) 16 (5%) 30 (10%) 0 0
RAPID randomized 118 123 65 63 25 25
relapsed 6 (5%) 13 (11%) 3 (5%) 5 (8%) 0 3 (12%)
  • * mainly due to missing ESR.

Keywords: Hodgkin lymphoma, Radiation Therapy

No conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.