Volume 6, Issue 1 pp. 7-12
Article
Full Access

Treatment of early chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Intermittent chlorambucil versus observation

Dr. C. Shustik

Corresponding Author

Dr. C. Shustik

Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada

Royal Victoria Hospital, Division of Hematology, 687 Pine Avenue West, Montreal. Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1Search for more papers by this author
R. Mick

R. Mick

Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
R. Silver

R. Silver

Cancer and Leukemia Group B, New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
A. Sawitsky

A. Sawitsky

Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
K. Rai

K. Rai

Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
L. Shapiro

L. Shapiro

Cancer and Leukemia Group B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Montreal, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: January/March 1988
Citations: 67

Abstract

The effect of early therapy on the course of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has not been established. Fifty-nine patients with indolent Rai stage I and II CLL were randomized to receive intermittent chlorambucil once a month or to receive no treatment. The two groups were comparable in entry characteristics. At 5 years from randomization there was no significant difference in survival between the two groups although the proportion of patients exhibiting active disease 5 years after randomization is 70 per cent in the untreated group and 55 per cent in the treated group. In this study, early treatment of CLL with intermittent chlorambucil did not result in a survival advantage for patients with indolent stage I and II CLL.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.