Volume 53, Issue 3 pp. 1066-1067
Correspondence
Free Access

Genotype 4 hepatitis C virus: Beware of false-negative RNA detection

Sepideh Akhavan M.D.

Sepideh Akhavan M.D.

Virology Laboratory, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Christophe Ronsin M.D.

Christophe Ronsin M.D.

Laboratoire Biomnis, Ivry sur Seine, France

Search for more papers by this author
Syria Laperche M.D.

Syria Laperche M.D.

Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
Vincent Thibault M.D.

Vincent Thibault M.D.

Virology Laboratory, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France

Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 September 2010
Citations: 9

Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.

To the Editor:

We have followed with interest the debate regarding the ability of the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan (CAP/CTM) hepatitis C virus (HCV) test (Roche, Meylan, France) to accurately detect and quantify genotype 4 HCV.1-4

We recently identified seven genotype 4 samples [4h (4); 4k (2); 4l (1)] from HCV antibody–positive patients; we repeatedly found them HCV RNA undetectable with CAP/CTM, but we discovered viral loads greater than 5 log10 IU/mL with the Abbott RealTime HCV assay (Abbott, Rungis, France). When the 5′-noncoding gene of these undetected samples was compared to sequences from 29 genotype 4 samples [4 (5); 4a (6); 4c (1); 4d (9); 4f (1); 4g (2); 4h (2); 4k (2); 4r (1)], significant sequence differences between underquantified samples (difference between the two assays > 1 log10 IU/mL), undetected strains, and samples with comparable viral loads were identified at positions 145 (P < 0.0001), 165 (P < 0.0001), 203 (P < 0.0001), and 204 (P = 0.0002) with the chi-square test. Positions 203 and 204 represent a nucleotide insertion in a few subtypes (f, g, h, k, o, p, and q) and are unlikely to play a role in CAP/CTM underquantification. However, any mutation at position 145 (rarely described) could dramatically impair the performance of the Roche assay, whereas a mutated nucleotide at position 165 (constantly found in subtypes g, h, k, l, m, o, and q) leads to decreased quantification of many genotype 4 subtypes.2, 5, 6

In contrast to the statement by Halfon et al.4 on the possible use of CAP/CTM, we would like to stress the risk incurred when this assay is used.4 Because highly sensitive real-time polymerase chain reaction–based assays for viral load monitoring are also used as first-line tools to document active HCV replication, our strict recommendation is to not use CAP/CTM to initially identify an active HCV infection or in the case of acute hepatitis because the risk of missing a genuine HCV infection is not negligible.2 Even though the prevalence of particular mutants carrying both 145 and 165 nucleotide substitutions is probably low, it is our duty not to deliver a false reassuring diagnosis of cleared HCV infection.

Sepideh Akhavan M.D.* , Christophe Ronsin M.D. , Syria Laperche M.D.§, Vincent Thibault M.D.* , * Virology Laboratory, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France, Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, France, Laboratoire Biomnis, Ivry sur Seine, France, § Institut National de la Transfusion Sanguine, Paris, France.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.