Volume 52, Issue 2 pp. 798-799
Correspondence
Free Access

Antituberculosis therapy drug-induced liver injury and acute liver failure

Harshad Devarbhavi M.D., D.M.

Harshad Devarbhavi M.D., D.M.

Department of Gastroenterology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India

William J. Von Liebig Transplant Center

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine

Search for more papers by this author
Ross Dierkhising M.S.

Ross Dierkhising M.S.

William J. Von Liebig Transplant Center

Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN

Search for more papers by this author
Walter K. Kremers Ph.D.

Walter K. Kremers Ph.D.

William J. Von Liebig Transplant Center

Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 July 2010
Citations: 26

Potential conflict of interest: Nothing to report.

To the Editor:

We read with great interest the study by Kumar et al.,1 who reported antituberculosis therapy (ATT) as the only cause of drug-induced acute liver failure (ALF) in northern India, in contrast to antimicrobials, anticonvulsants, and paracetamol in the West2-6 and in southern India.7

Our experience with drug-induced liver injury (DILI), including injury due to ATT, from 1997 to 2008 at the Department of Gastroenterology of St. John's Medical College Hospital (Bangalore, India) offers something in support of their findings and something at odds.7 Table 1 outlines the clinical and biochemical characteristics of all patients with DILI due to ATT. Kumar et al.1 found a mortality rate of 67% among 70 patients (mean age = 32 years) with ATT-caused ALF; most (63%) were treated empirically for tuberculosis. In support of their findings, we observed that our patients were young (mean age = 40 years) and that the mortality rate was 67% among 49 patients with ALF due to ATT and 42% among patients who were inappropriately treated for tuberculosis. Our model, using a combination of the bilirubin level [odds ratio (OR) = 1.17, confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-1.35], prothrombin time (OR = 1.13, CI = 1.06-1.24), and creatinine level (OR = 9.77, CI = 2.58-57.63), yielded a concordance of 97% for mortality.

Table 1. Summary of Demographic, Clinical, and Laboratory Variables for Survivors and Nonsurvivors of ATT-Caused DILI with Univariate Logistic Regressions
Variable Survivors (n = 142) Nonsurvivors (n = 39) OR (95% CI) P Value Concordance (%)
Age (years) 42.9 40.2 1.00 (0.96-1.01) 0.351 52
Male 101 (55.8%) 80 (44.2%) 0.79 (0.38-1.62) 0.522 53
Jaundice 96 (67.6%) 39 (100%) 37.0 (9.2-658.5) <0.001 70
Skin rashes 15 (10.6%) 09 (23.7%) 2.6 (1.0-6.5) 0.05 56
Encephalopathy 16 (11.3%) 33 (84.6%) 43.3 (16.7-130.2) <0.001 87
Ascites 25 (17.7%) 25 (64.1%) 8.3 (3.8-18.6) <0.001 73
Treatment duration (months) 1.8 2.2 1.0 (0.99-1.0) 0.34 60
Total proteins (g/dL) 6.3 5.6 0.6 (0.4-0.8) 0.003 66
Albumin (g/dL) 3.0 2.4 0.3 (0.2-0.5) <0.001 70
Total bilirubin (mg/dL) 6.5 20.4 1.2 (1.1-1.3) <0.001 88
Direct bilirubin (mg/dL) 4.4 11.2 1.2 (1.1-1.3) <0.001 88
AST (u/L) 381.4 733.2 1.00 (1.00-1.00) 0.006 63
ALT (u/L) 340.1 590.7 1.00 (1.00-1.0) 0.062 53
ALP (u/L) 227 331 1.00 (1.00-1.00) 0.03 69
PT (seconds) 23.9 60.2 1.09 (1.06-1.13) <0.001 90
INR 1.7 5.0 2.7 (1.9-4.1) <0.001 90
Serum creatinine (mg/dL) 0.9 1.9 5.7 (2.1-27.2) <0.001 74
WBC (μL) 9784 13907 1.00 (1.00-1.00) 0.002 64
Eosinophils (%) 2.3 1.1 0.8 (0.6-1.00) 0.05 62
Platelets (105/μL) 2.2 2.0 0.8 (0.6-1.2) 0.39 64
MELD 15.1 36.8 1.3 (1.2-1.9) <0.001 97
  • Data are presented as means or n (%).
  • Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; INR, international normalized ratio; MELD, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease; PT, prothrombin time; WBC, white blood count.
  • * From a univariate logistic regression model predicting death (yes versus no).
  • OR for a 100-U increase.
  • OR for a 1000-U increase.

We were intrigued to find ATT as the sole cause of drug-induced ALF in their series over 22 years. In our series, ATT was a contributing factor in 58% of all cases of DILI (n = 313) and in 76.6% of patients with drug-induced ALF. Others who presented with ALF included users of phenytoin (n = 5), dapsone (n = 3), paracetamol (n = 1), complementary medicine (n = 1), amoxicillin-clavulanate (n = 1), hormones (n = 1), atorvastatin (n = 1), and chemotherapeutics (n = 2). How can the differences be explained? Were patients with only select types of ALF admitted while others sought admission elsewhere? Moreover, is it possible to determine the proportion of patients with ALF among all ATT-caused DILI patients because such patients are reported by the institute?8 Despite the increasing prevalence of tuberculosis and acquired immune deficiency syndrome in the last decade, we were surprised to read about the decreasing incidence of ALF due to ATT and the absence of human immunodeficiency virus infection; this is contrary to our experience.

In summary, ATT-induced ALF is a major cause of drug-induced ALF in India, but it is not the only cause; phenytoin, dapsone, and others also contribute. Inappropriate medications contribute to a large number of ATT-caused cases of DILI and ALF, which are potentially preventable. A high Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score or a combination of the bilirubin level, prothrombin time, and creatinine level is associated with mortality, and patients may be selected for early referral for transplantation.

Harshad Devarbhavi M.D., D.M.* , Ross Dierkhising M.S. §, Walter K. Kremers Ph.D.§ §, * Department of Gastroenterology, St. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, India, William J. Von Liebig Transplant Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, § Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.