Volume 41, Issue 3 pp. 765-773
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Influence of comorbidity on therapeutic decision making and impact on outcomes in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancers: Results from a prospective cohort study

JaiPrakash Agarwal MD

JaiPrakash Agarwal MD

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Deepanjali Adulkar DNB

Deepanjali Adulkar DNB

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Monali Swain MD

Corresponding Author

Monali Swain MD

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

Correspondence

Monali Swain, Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial hospital, Dr E Borges Road, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400012, India.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Santam Chakraborty MD

Santam Chakraborty MD

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Tejpal Gupta MD

Tejpal Gupta MD

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Ashwini Budrukkar MD

Ashwini Budrukkar MD

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar MD

Sarbani Ghosh-Laskar MD

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
Vedang Murthy MD

Vedang Murthy MD

Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 December 2018
Citations: 12
Funding information Intramural Tata Memorial Centre Research Fund, Grant/Award Number: Intramural Tata Memorial Centre Research Fund

Abstract

Background

High prevalence of comorbidity in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) often lead to suboptimal treatment. The presence study aims to evaluate the presence of comorbidity, its impact on therapeutic decision making, treatment compliance, and overall survival in HNSCC.

Methods

Five hundred eighteen patients with nonmetastatic HNSCC, elder than 18 years of age, without any prior history of cancer or anticancer treatment in the last 5 years were evaluated using Adult Comorbidity Evaluation 27 (ACE 27) index.

Results

Two hundred ninety three (56.6%) patients had comorbidity, and 20.6% had deviation from the ideal treatment plan. Higher grade of comorbidity led to less likely completion of guideline-concordant therapy (moderate ACE 27 vs none: odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.82, P < .01*; severe ACE 27 vs none: OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.57, P < .01*). Patients who completed guideline-concordant treatment had the best outcomes as compared to those who could not (median survival: not reached vs 9.56 months, hazard ratio 3.66, 95% CI: 2.8-4.79; P < .01*).

Conclusion

Presence of increasing severity of comorbidity in HNSCC influences therapeutic decision making. Survival outcomes are poorer in patients receiving guideline-discordant treatment.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None declared.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.