Volume 26, Issue 10 pp. 884-889
Regular Article

Sensory topography of the oral cavity and the impact of free flap reconstruction: A preliminary study

Karen B. Zur MD

Karen B. Zur MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Box 1189, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029

Search for more papers by this author
Eric M. Genden MD

Corresponding Author

Eric M. Genden MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Box 1189, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029

Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Box 1189, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029Search for more papers by this author
Mark L. Urken MD

Mark L. Urken MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Box 1189, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY 10029

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 September 2004
Citations: 11

Presented at the Eastern Section of the American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc., Philadelphia, PA, February 2002

Abstract

Background.

The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to (1) assess the computerized pressure-specific sensory device (PSSD) as a tool for measuring oral cavity sensation, (2) establish a topographic sensory map of the oral cavity, and (3) objectively evaluate postoperative sensory recovery of noninnervated oral cavity free flap reconstruction.

Methods.

Twenty-three healthy control subjects were recruited to test four intraoral sites and the volar forearm. Sensory scores were evaluated for consistent trends between an established sensory tool, the Semmes Weinstein Monofilament (SWM), and the PSSD. Sensory control values were then compared with those of 18 patients who underwent reconstruction of the oral cavity with a noninnervated microvascular free flap.

Results.

The SWM testing demonstrated the lowest sensory thresholds in the lower lip, followed by the lateral tongue, buccal mucosa, and central tongue. The PSSD also demonstrated the lowest sensory thresholds in the lower lip followed by the lateral tongue; however, the central tongue demonstrated a lower sensory threshold than did the buccal mucosa. The neotongue of patients with noninnervated free flaps demonstrated inferior sensation compared with the native tongue (p < .05).

Conclusions.

We have established normal sensory values for the oral cavity, skin of the volar forearm, and noninnervated free flap tissue within the oral cavity. Although discrepancies exist between the data derived from the SWM and the PSSD, the PSSD represents a reliable, sensitive, and easy method for assessing sensation of the oral cavity. Furthermore, PSSD testing is not affected by saliva or movement. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 26: 884–889,2004

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.