Volume 14, Issue 3 pp. 231-244
Outcome Measurement

Health state values for the HUI 2 descriptive system: results from a UK survey

Christopher McCabe

Corresponding Author

Christopher McCabe

Sheffield Health Economics Group, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, UK

Trent Institute for Health Services Research, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, UK

Sheffield Health Economics Group, University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK===Search for more papers by this author
Katherine Stevens

Katherine Stevens

Sheffield Health Economics Group, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Jennifer Roberts

Jennifer Roberts

Sheffield Health Economics Group, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, UK

Search for more papers by this author
John Brazier

John Brazier

Sheffield Health Economics Group, ScHARR, University of Sheffield, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 September 2004
Citations: 63

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a study to estimate a statistical health state valuation model for a revised version of the Health Utilities Index Mark 2, using Standard Gamble health state preference data. A sample of 51 health states were valued by a sample of the 198 members of the UK general population. Models are estimated for predicting health state valuations for all 8000 states defined by the revised HUI2. The recommended model produces logical and significant coefficients for all levels of all dimensions in the HUI2. These coefficients appear to be robust across model specifications. This model performs well in predicting the observed health state values within the valuation sample and for a separate validation sample of health states. However, there are concerns over large prediction errors for two health states in the valuation sample. These problems must be balanced against concerns over the validity of using the VAS based health state valuation data of the original HUI2 valuation model. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.