Volume 32, Issue 2 pp. 183-192
Research Article

Potentially inappropriate medications and drug–drug interactions in home-dwelling people with mild dementia

Ragnhild Oesterhus

Corresponding Author

Ragnhild Oesterhus

Centre for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Correspondence to: R. D. Oesterhus, E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Dag Aarsland

Dag Aarsland

Centre for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway

Department of Neurobiology Caring Science and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Hogne Soennesyn

Hogne Soennesyn

Centre for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
Arvid Rongve

Arvid Rongve

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Department of Research and Innovation, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
Geir Selbaek

Geir Selbaek

Vestfold Hospital Trust, Norwegian Advisory Unit on Ageing and Health, Tønsberg, Norway

Centre for Old Age Psychiatric Research, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Ottestad, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
Svein R. Kjosavik

Svein R. Kjosavik

Centre for Age-Related Medicine, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway

Research Unit for General Practice, Uni Research Health, Bergen, Norway

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 February 2016
Citations: 26

Abstract

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to describe the use of psychotropic drugs among home-dwelling people with mild dementia, to identify potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) and drug–drug interactions (DDI), and to analyze potential variables associated with having PIM and DDI.

Methods

Patients (n = 251) with a first-time diagnosis of mild dementia (defined as a mini-mental state examination score >20) were included from outpatient clinics. Prevalence of psychotropic drug use, polypharmacy, and psychotropic polypharmacy were investigated. The prevalence of PIM and DDI were defined using the Norwegian general practice criteria and an interactions database, respectively. Variables associated with having PIM and DDI were assessed using a multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical variables.

Results

Almost 96% of the patients used one or more medications. Polypharmacy was found in 45% of the patients, and nearly 70% of the patients were using one or more psychotropic drugs. Psychotropic polypharmacy was found in seven patients. PIM were identified in 35 patients (14%), while only four severe DDI were found. Female sex and number of medications were significantly associated with having PIM, whereas only number of medications was significantly associated with having DDI.

Conclusion

Few patients had PIM or severe DDI, indicating that the quality of prescribing was acceptable. However, psychotropic drug use was common in home-dwelling people with mild dementia despite limited evidence of benefit in dementia. More knowledge is needed about the potential risks associated with psychotropic drug use and having PIM and DDI in people with mild dementia. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.