Volume 6, Issue 1 pp. 247-251
Original Article
Full Access

The incomplete, multiple ascertainment model: Assumptions, applications, and alternative models

Jon Stene

Corresponding Author

Jon Stene

Institute of Statistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

Institute of Statistics, University of Copenhagen, Studiestraede 6, DK-1455 Copenhagen K, DenmarkSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 1989
Citations: 7

Abstract

Assumptions and applications of the widely used incomplete, multiple ascertainment model have been examined. The common use of a reduced version of the model by suppressing the information about independently ascertained probands leads to inaccurate and unstable estimates. The fact that many samples consist mainly of families ascertained through the first member who has the disorder may lead to seriously biased estimates of the segregation probability, as the model does not take this common ascertainment situation into account.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.