Volume 24, Issue 3 pp. 181-190
Original Article
Full Access

A score for Bayesian genome screening

E. Warwick Daw

E. Warwick Daw

Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for more papers by this author
Ellen M. Wijsman

Ellen M. Wijsman

Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Search for more papers by this author
Elizabeth A. Thompson

Corresponding Author

Elizabeth A. Thompson

Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington

Department of Statistics, University of Washington, Box 354322, Seattle, WA 98195-4322===Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 March 2003
Citations: 11

Abstract

Bayesian Monte Carlo Markov chain (MCMC) techniques have shown promise in dissecting complex genetic traits. The methods introduced by Heath ([1997], Am. J. Hum. Genet. 61:748–760), and implemented in the program Loki, have been able to localize genes for complex traits in both real and simulated data sets. Loki estimates the posterior probability of quantitative trait loci (QTL) at locations on a chromosome in an iterative MCMC process. Unfortunately, interpretation of the results and assessment of their significance have been difficult. Here, we introduce a score, the log of the posterior placement probability ratio (LOP), for assessing oligogenic QTL detection and localization. The LOP is the log of the posterior probability of linkage to the real chromosome divided by the posterior probability of linkage to an unlinked pseudochromosome, with marker informativeness similar to the marker data on the real chromosome. Since the LOP cannot be calculated exactly, we estimate it in simultaneous MCMC on both real and pseudochromosomes. We investigate empirically the distributional properties of the LOP in the presence and absence of trait genes. The LOP is not subject to trait model misspecification in the way a lod score may be, and we show that the LOP can detect linkage for loci of small effect when the lod score cannot. We show how, in the absence of linkage, an empirical distribution of the LOP may be estimated by simulation and used to provide an assessment of linkage detection significance. Genet Epidemiol 24:181–190, 2003. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.