Volume 9, Issue 3 pp. 89-111
Article
Full Access

Effective NEPA implementation: The facilitated approach

Judith Landry Lee

Judith Landry Lee

Judith Landry Lee is the owner of Environmental Planning Strategies, Inc. She has 20 years of experience and education in natural resources management, environmental planning, and practical and effective implementation of NEPA and public involvement.

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen Russell

Stephen Russell

Steve Russell is a mechanical engineer who has spent the past ten years in the environmental field performing pollution prevention and environmental planning, as well as implementing and developing compliance strategies for the Army, Navy, and Air Force. Mr. Russell is currently working on Air Force environmental issues at Robins Air Force Base, Warner Robins, Georgia.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 10 January 2007

Abstract

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) allows applicants, states, and contractors to prepare environmental assessments (EAs) and environmental impact statements (EISs). However, under all circumstances, the federal official is held fully accountable for the scope, objectivity, content, and accuracy of the NEPA analyses and documents prepared for the agency by others. The commonly used paradigm for contracting requires contractors to conduct the analyses and prepare the documents, with federal involvement primarily limited to review and comment of partially completed deliverables. This approach results in contractors fulfilling inherently governmental responsibilities and often causing conflict, frustration, higher costs, longer execution time, and alternatives which may not meet mission objectives.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.