Volume 2, Issue 6 e12624
IMAGES IN EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Open Access

Postprocedural development of left upper extremity mass

Kayla Baker

Kayla Baker

OMS IV

Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine—Carolinas Campus, Spartanburg, South Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Lindsay Tjiattas-Saleski DO, MBA

Corresponding Author

Lindsay Tjiattas-Saleski DO, MBA

Departments of Family Practice and Emergency Medicine, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine—Carolinas Campus, Spartanburg, South Carolina, USA

Correspondence

Lindsay Tjiattas-Saleski DO, MBA, Departments of Family Practice and Emergency Medicine, Associate Dean of Clinical Affairs, Edward Via College of Osteopathic Medicine, Carolinas Campus, Spartanburg, SC, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 December 2021

Meetings: Presented at VCOM- Carolinas Research Day as a poster presentation in Spring 2021

1 PATIENT PRESENTATION

An 89-year-old male presented to the emergency department for a lump near his antecubital fossa of his left upper extremity. He recently underwent percutaneous left brachial artery access for splenic artery embolization. Post procedure, he developed swelling around the intravenous site and numbness in the fingers of his left hand with decreased grip strength. On physical examination, there was a mass over the left medial epicondylar region with no erythema, edema, tenderness, or warmth (Figure 1). The lesion was not pulsatile. He had associated decrease pincher grasp of his left upper extremity. An ultrasound of the mass was ordered.

Details are in the caption following the image
Mass over the left medial epicondylar region

2 DIAGNOSIS

2.1 Pseudoaneurysm

Ultrasound of the left upper extremity showed an anechoic structure measuring 7.0 × 2.6 cm (Figure 2). Doppler of the structure revealed a swirling color flow and a small neck feeding the vessel near the medial left distal humerus soft tissue. This bidirectional blood flow creates a “Yin-Yang” appearance, which is a classic ultrasound finding for pseudoaneurysms (Figure 3). Pseudoaneurysms most commonly occur as complications of endovascular procedures 0.5% to 2% of the time.1 They are a known complication of endovascular procedures with the femoral artery, which is the most common arterial access.2 However, the arteries in the upper extremity are becoming more favored for procedural use because of fewer hospital complications as compared to femoral access.3 Recognition of a pseudoaneurysm is imperative because of the risk of rupture, hemorrhage, and potential distal ischemia due to reduced blood flow.1, 4 Some pseudoaneurysms with diameters of less than 1.8 cm may spontaneously resolve.5, 6 For those larger in diameter, thrombin injection is the preferred treatment.5, 6 Ultrasound guided direct compression may also be used to resolve pseudoaneurysms non-invasively.5 Surgical repair is reserved for those patients who fail either the thrombin injection or direct compression.7 This patient was ultimately referred to vascular surgery for repair.

Details are in the caption following the image
Anechoic structure along the left distal humerus measuring 7.0 × 2.6 cm
Details are in the caption following the image
Internal swirling on ultrasound color Doppler flow demonstrating the classic “Yin-Yang” sign of a pseudoaneurysm

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.