Prejudice toward immigrant workers among Dutch employees: integrated threat theory revisited
Corresponding Author
Petru Lucian Curşeu
Department of Organisation Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Department of Organisation Studies, Tilburg University; Room, S161; Warandelaan 2, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.Search for more papers by this authorRon Stoop
Department of Organisation Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorRené Schalk
Department of Organisation Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Petru Lucian Curşeu
Department of Organisation Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Department of Organisation Studies, Tilburg University; Room, S161; Warandelaan 2, PO Box 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands.Search for more papers by this authorRon Stoop
Department of Organisation Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorRené Schalk
Department of Organisation Studies, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Integrated Threat Theory (ITT) (Stephan & Stephan, 1993, 1996) describes four types of threats as mediators in the relation between antecedent factors (previous intergroup conflict, intergroup contact, status inequalities, in-group identification, knowledge about the out-group, and intergroup contact) and prejudice. The four mediating types of threats, which influence prejudice according to ITT are: intergroup anxiety, negative stereotyping, realistic and symbolic threats. In this study, the ITT model was tested using structural equation modeling on data collected in sample of 187 Dutch employees. Two alternative explanatory models are proposed in which, first intergroup anxiety and then negative stereotyping mediate the relation between the other ITT threats and prejudice. The data show a good fit with the model in which negative stereotypes are considered as mediator variable. The implications of these findings for ITT are discussed in the context of recent theoretical developments in the study of stereotypes and prejudice. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- Akarami, N., Ekehamar, B., & Araya, T. (2000). Classical and modern racial prejudice: A study of attitudes toward immigrants in Sweden. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 521–532.
- Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Bogardus, E. S. (1925). Measuring social distance. Journal of Applied Sociology, 9, 299–308.
- Bogardus, E. S. (1933). A social distance scale. Sociology and Social Research 3, 265–271.
- Brown, R. (1995). Prejudice. Its social psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Bizman, A., & Yinon, Y. (2001). Intergroup and interpersonal threats as determinants of prejudice: The moderating role of in-group identification. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 23, 191–196.
- Cadinu, M., & Reggiori, C. (2002). Discrimination of low status outgroup: The role of ingroup threat. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 501–515.
- CBS. (2002). Arbeidsmarkt. Banen van werknemers naar economische activiteit en geslacht. Document published on the web page of Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek, http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/default.htm
- Devine, P. G., Plant, E. A., & Blair, I. V. (2003). Classic and contemporary analyses of racial prejudice. In R. Brown, & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intergroup processes ( 2nd ed.). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
- Duckitt, J. (1992). The social psychology of prejudice. New York: Praeger.
- Esses, V. M., & Dovidio, J. F. (2002). The role of emotions in determining willingness to engage in intergroup contact. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1202–1214.
- European Opinion research Group (EORG). (2002). Eurobarometer 56.3. Survey carried out for the European Commission, May 24th, 2002.
- Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., Muñoz-Rojas, D., Invernizzi, F., & Mugny, G. (2004). Perceived in-group threat as a factor moderating the influence of in-group norms on discrimination against foreigners. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 135–153.
- Fazio, R. H., & Olson, M. A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297–327.
- Fiske, S. T. (2000). Stereotyping, prejudice and discrimination at the seam between centuries: Evolution, culture, mind and brain. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30, 299–322.
- Greenland, K., & Brown, R. (1999). Categorization and intergroup anxiety in contact between British and Japanese nationals. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 503–521.
- Greenwald, G. A., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480.
- Greenwald, G. A., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109, 3–25.
- Hamilton, D. L., & Sherman, J. W. (1994). Stereotypes. In R. S. Wyer, & T. K. Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition ( 2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1–68). Hilsdale, NJ: Elrbaum.
- Hilton, J., & Hippel, W. (1996). Stereotypes. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 237–271.
- Hostfede, G. (1996). Cultural constraints in management theories. In R. M. Steers, L. W. Porter, & G. A. Bigley (Eds.), Motivation and leadership at work ( 6th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill.
- Hoyle, R. H., & Panter, A. T. (1995). Writing about structural equation models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 158–176). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling (pp. 76–99). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
- Jackson, J. (1993). Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. The Psychological Record, 43, 395–414.
- Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1993). The role of stereotyping in system justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
- Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1993). Definition and assessment of accuracy in social stereotypes. Psychological Review, 100, 109–128.
- Marsh, H. W., & Hocevar, D. (1985). Application of confirmatory factor analysis to the study of self-concept: First- and higher-order factor models and their invariance across groups. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 562–582.
- Maass, A. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype-perpetuation through language. In M. Zanna (Ed.) Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 31, pp. 79–121). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Miller.
- McLaren, L. M. (2003). Anti-immigrant prejudice in Europe: Contact, threat perception, and preferences for the exclusion of migrants. Social Forces, 81, 909–936.
- Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Integroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 65–85.
- Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (1995). Subtle and blatant prejudice in Western Europe. European Journal of Social Psychology, 25, 57–75.
- Pettigrew, T. F., & Meertens, R. W. (2001). In defense of the subtle prejudice concept: A retort. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 299–309.
- Robertson, L., Kulik, C. T., & Pepper, M. B. (2001). Designing effective diversity training: Influence of group composition and trainee experience. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 871–885.
- Rossett, A., & Bickman, T. (1994). Diversity training: Hope, faith and cynicism. Training, 31, 40–46.
- Stangor, C., Sullivan, L.A., & Ford, T.E. (1991). Affective and cognitive determinants of prejudice. Social Cognition, 9, 359–380.
- Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1985). Intergroup anxiety. Journal of Social Issues, 41, 157–175.
-
Stephan, W. G., &
Stephan, C. W.
(1993).
Cognition and affect in stereotyping: Parallel interactive networks. In
D. M. Mackie, &
D. L. Hamilton (Eds.),
Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: Interactive processes in group perception (pp.
111–136).
Orlando, FL:
Academic Press.
10.1016/B978-0-08-088579-7.50010-7 Google Scholar
- Stephan, W. G., & Stephan, C. W. (1996). Predicting prejudice. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 20, 409–426.
- Stephan, W. G., Stephan, C. W., & Gudykunst, W. (1999a). Anxiety in intergroup relations: A comparison of anxiety/uncertainty management theory and integrated threat theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 23, 613–628.
- Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., & Bachman, G. (1999a). Prejudice toward immigrants: An integrated threat theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29, 2221–2237.
- Stephan, C. W., Demitrakis, K. M., Yamada, A. M., & Clason, D. L. (2000). Women's attitudes toward men: An integrated threat theory approach. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 63–73.
- Stephan, W. G., Renfro, C. L., Esses, M. V., Stephan, C. W., & Martin, T. (2005). The effects of feeling threaten on attitudes toward immigrants. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 29, 1–19.
- Stephan, W. G., Ybarra, O., Martinez, C., Schwarzwald, J., & Tur-Kaspa, M. (1998). Prejudice toward immigrants to Spain and Israel: An integrated threat theory analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 559–576.
- Stephan, W. G., Boniecki, K. A., Ybarra, O., Bettencourt, A., Erwin, K. S., Jackson, L.A., McNatt, P. S., & Renfro, C. L., (2002). The role of threats in the racial attitudes of blacks and whites. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1242–1254.
- Widman, K. F., & Thomson, J. S. (2003). On specifying the null model for incremental fit indices in structural equation modeling. Psychological Methods, 8, 16–37.
- Zarate, M. A., Garcia, B., Garza, A. A., & Hitlan, R. T. (2004). Cultural threat and perceived realistic group conflict as dual predictors of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 99–105.