RESEARCH ARTICLE
Unpacking Forest Stewardship Council certification in Chile: The scope and limitations of neoliberal market-driven governance for achieving sustainable development
Tomas Undurraga,
Mario Fergnani,
Corresponding Author
Tomas Undurraga
Sociology, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Chile, Santiago, Chile
Correspondence
Tomas Undurraga Sociology, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Almirante Barroso 10, Santiago, Chile.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMario Fergnani
Sociology, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Santiago, Chile
Search for more papers by this authorTomas Undurraga,
Mario Fergnani,
Corresponding Author
Tomas Undurraga
Sociology, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Chile, Santiago, Chile
Correspondence
Tomas Undurraga Sociology, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Almirante Barroso 10, Santiago, Chile.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorMario Fergnani
Sociology, Universidad Alberto Hurtado, Santiago, Chile
Search for more papers by this authorFirst published: 31 October 2024
Abstract
The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) is an international NGO promoting sustainable forest management by setting standards and certifying timber as eco-friendly. After facing significant resistance from the Chilean forestry sector, which is plagued by environmental and territorial conflicts, FSC began certifying Chile's main forestry corporations in 2010. This article examines the implementation of FSC's standards by addressing two questions. First, how does FSC function in practice, including the roles of consultants, chambers, and instruments in the certification process? Second, what are the scope and limitations of FSC in achieving sustainable development and managing forestry industry conflicts? Elaborating on 24 interviews with key forestry stakeholders, ethnographic fieldwork, and documentary analysis, the findings indicate that FSC enhances management practices in the forestry industry by promoting legal compliance, rational production management, and improved relations between firms and local communities. FSC provides a green imaginary that ‘cleans up’ timber production as conflict-free, facilitating its free circulation in the international market. However, as a private governance system, FSC is based on an artificial consensus that has limitations such as power imbalances between firms and communities, limited sanctioning power, and close ties with large industry actors. This neoliberal form of governance fails to resolve structural problems between industry and indigenous communities, yet it creates strategic opportunities for mediating the relationships between actors. In Chile, FSC enables incomplete citizenship for communities and serves as a ‘soft regulation’ for firms, reducing the likelihood of increased State regulation in the forestry sector.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Research data are not shared.
REFERENCES
- Alister-Sanhueza, C., Bravo-Armazabal, L., Galliorio-Jorquera, Á., Julián-Véjar, D., & Marchant-Fuentes, F. (2022). Are there unions in La Araucanía? Organizational problems in research and action experiences. Izquierdas, 51, 24. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-50492022000100224
10.4067/S0718-50492022000100224 Google Scholar
- Andersson, J., & Westholm, E. (2019). Closing the future: Environmental research and the management of conflicting future value orders. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 44(2), 237–262.
- L. Astorga, & H. Burschel (Eds.). (2020). Chile necesita un Nuevo Modelo Forestal. Ante los desafíos climáticos, sociales y ambientales. LOM Ediciones.
- Auld, G. (2014). Constructing Private Governance. The Rise and Evolution of Forest, Coffee, and Fisheries Certification. Yale University Press.
- Auld, G., Renckens, S., & Cashore, B. (2015). Transnational private governance between the logics of empowerment and control. Regulation and Governance, 9(2), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12075
- Bartley, T. (2022). Power and the practice of transnational private regulation. New Political Economy, 27(2), 188–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1881471
- Bloomfield, M. J. (2012). Is forest certification a hegemonic force? The FSC and its challengers. Journal of Environment and Development, 21(4), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496512449822
10.1177/1070496512449822 Google Scholar
- Cashore, B., Auld, G., & Newsom, D. (2004). Governing through markets. Forest Certification and the emergence of non-state authority. Yale University Press.
- Cid-Aguayo, B. E., Krstulovic-Matus, J. E., Carrasco Henríquez, N., Mella-Moraga, V., & Oñate Vargas, D. (2023). Callampas of disaster: Negotiations and struggles for the commons under forestry hegemony in Chile. Community Development Journal, 58(3), 435–452.
10.1093/cdj/bsac030 Google Scholar
- CIFAG. (2013). El aporte de la Ingeniería Forestal al desarrollo del país. Una reseña histórica de la profesión forestal en Chile.
- CONAF. (2016). Cuenta pública participative 2014–2016.
- Cook, W. C., Turnhout, E., & van Bommel, S. (2020). Learning to become an FSC auditor: Objectivity, interpretation, and mastery. Science & Technology Studies, 33(2), 32–48.
10.23987/sts.60766 Google Scholar
- CORMA. (2022). Memoria 2021–2022.
- Cuevas Valenzuela, H., & Grosser, G. (2021). A new Spirit of capitalism? A critical content analysis of the discourses of Empresas Arauco and cmpc (2003–2018). Estudios sociológicos, 39(117), 793–829.
- Di Giminiani, P. (2016). How to manage a Forest: Environmental governance in neoliberal Chile. Anthropological Quarterly, 89(3), 723–751. https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2016.0045
- Di Giminiani, P., & Oakley, R. E. (2023). The making of a conservation frontier: Nation-building, green productivism, and environmentalism in Patagonia. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 28(4), 266–275.
10.1111/jlca.12684 Google Scholar
- Dicenta, M., & Gerrard, A. C. (2023). Ecotourism, infrastructures, and the drama of sovereignty on a border Island. The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology, 28(4), 298–309.
10.1111/jlca.12696 Google Scholar
- Doganova, L. (2024). Discounting the future: The ascendancy of a political technology. Princeton University Press.
- Durand, F. (2015). Poder político y Gobierno Minero. Cuadernos de CooperAcción—Acción Solidaria para el Desarrollo. Perú.
- Ehrnström-Fuentes, M. (2015). Delinking legitimacies: A pluriversal perspective on political CSR. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 433–462. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12173
10.1111/joms.12173 Google Scholar
- Ehrnström-Fuentes, M., & Kröger, M. (2017). In the shadows of social license to operate: Untold investment grievances in Latin America. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.112
- Elbakidze, M., Dawson, L., McDermott, C. L., Teitelbaum, S., & Tysiachniouk, M. (2022). Biodiversity conservation through forest certification: Key factors shapingnational Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) standard-development processesin Canada, Sweden, and Russia. Ecology and Society, 27(1), 3–35.
- Fairfield, T. (2015). Private wealth and public revenue in Latin America: Business Power and tax politics. Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781316104767 Google Scholar
- Foucault, M. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage.
- FSC. (1995). Forest Stewardship Council. https://www.fsc.org/
- Giessen, L., Burns, S., Sahide, M. A. K., & Wibowo, A. (2016). From governance to government: The strengthened role of state bureaucracies in forest and agricultural certification. Policy and Society, 35(1), 71–89.
- Graf, J. (2024). The Forest Stewardship Council in Chile: Continuities of inequality through market-based regulation of Extractivist commodity chains. Sociology of Development, 1–29, 206–234. https://doi.org/10.1525/sod.2023.0016
10.1525/sod.2023.0016 Google Scholar
- Gustafsson, M.-T. (2018). Private politics and peasant mobilization: Mining in Peru. Palgrave McMillan.
10.1007/978-3-319-60756-6 Google Scholar
- Hale, C. R., & Millaman, R. (2018). Privatization of the ‘historic debt’? Mapuche territorial claims and the forest industry in southern Chile. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, 13(3), 305–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2018.1510658
10.1080/17442222.2018.1510658 Google Scholar
- Heilmayr, R., & Lambin, E. F. (2016). Impacts of nonstate, market-driven governance on Chilean forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(11), 2910–2915. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1600394113
- Henke, C., & Sims, B. (2020). Repairing infrastructures: The maintenance of materiality and Power. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11771.001.0001
10.7551/mitpress/11771.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Henne, A., & Gabrielson, T. (2012). Chile is timber country. In A. Latta & H. Wittman (Eds.), Environment and citizenship in Latin America: Natures, subjects and struggles (pp. 101–149). Berghahn Books.
10.2307/j.ctt9qczrq.12 Google Scholar
- Henne, A. (2015). Enviromentalism, ethical trade, and commodification. Technologies of Value and the Forest stewardship council in Chile. Routledge.
- INFOR. (2023). Exportaciones forestales 2022, Marzo 2023. Instituto Forestal, Ministerio de Agricultura.
- Johansson, J. (2012). Challenges to the legitimacy of private Forest governance - the development of Forest certification in Sweden. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(6), 424–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1591
- Klooster, D. (2010). Standardizing sustainable development? The Forest Stewardship Council's plantation policy review process as neoliberal environmental governance. Geoforum, 41(1), 117–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.02.006
- Klubock, T. M. (2014). La frontera: Forests and ecological conflict in Chile's frontier territory. Duke University Press.
10.1215/9780822376569 Google Scholar
- Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think. In Towards an Antropology beyond the human. University of California Press.
- Kurtz, M. (2001). State developmentalism without a developmental state: The public foundations of the “free market miracle” in Chile. Latin American Politics and Society, 43(2), 1–25.
- Latour, B., & Callon, M. (1997). “Tu ne calculeras pas!” ou comment symétriser le don et le capital. In A. Caillé (Ed.), Le capitalisme aujourd’hui. La Découverte.
- Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social—An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780199256044.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Lu, M., & Qiu, J. L. (2023). Transfer or translation? Rethinking traveling technologies from the global south. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 48(2), 272–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/01622439211072205
10.1177/01622439211072205 Google Scholar
- MacDonald. (2020). The politics of norm domestication in private transnational business regulation: A typology and illustrations. Environmental Policy and Governance, 30(5), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1908
- Maher, R., Pedemonte-Rojas, N., Gálvez, D., & Banerjee, S. B. (2023). The role of multistakeholder initiatives in the radicalization of resistance: The Forest stewardship council and the Mapuche conflict in Chile. Journal of Management Studies, 61(7), 2961–2991. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.13015
10.1111/joms.13015 Google Scholar
- Maletz, O., & Tysiachniouk, M. (2009). The effect of expertise on the quality of forest standards implementation: The case of FSC forest certification in Russia. Forest Policy and Economics, 11(5–6), 422–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.03.002
10.1016/j.forpol.2009.03.002 Google Scholar
- McCarthy, J. (2012). Certifying in contested spaces: Private regulation in Indonesian forestry and palm oil. Third World Quarterly, 33(10), 1871–1888. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.729721
- McDermott, C. L. (2012). Trust, legitimacy and power in forest certification: A case study of the FSC in British Columbia. Geoforum, 43(3), 634–644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.11.002
- McDermott, C. L., & Sotirov, M. (2018). A political economy of the European Union's timber regulation: Which member states would, should or could support and implement EU rules on the import of illegal wood? Forest Policy and Economics, 90(February), 180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.015
10.1016/j.forpol.2017.12.015 Google Scholar
- Millaman, R., & Hale, C. (2016). Chile's forestry industry, FSC Certification and Mapuche Comunities.
- Moog, S., Spicer, A., & Böhm, S. (2015). The politics of multi-stakeholder initiatives: The crisis of the Forest stewardship council. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), 469–493. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-2033-3
- Mora-Motta, A. (2018). Plantaciones forestales en Chile: ¿hacia un modelo más sustentable? Gestión y Ambiente, 21(Suppl), 100–116. https://doi.org/10.15446/ga.v21n2supl.77899
10.15446/ga.v21n2supl.77899 Google Scholar
- Mora-Motta, A. (2024). Tree plantation Extractivism in Chile. Routledge.
10.4324/9781003392521 Google Scholar
- Niedziałkowski, K., & Shkaruba, A. (2018). Governance and legitimacy of the Forest stewardship council certification in the national contexts—A comparative study of Belarus and Poland. Forest Policy and Economics, 97(December), 180–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.005
10.1016/j.forpol.2018.10.005 Google Scholar
- Pairican, F. (2014). La rebelión del movimiento mapuche 1990–2013. Pehuén Editores.
- Power, M. K. (2003). Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(4), 379–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00047-2
- Sarkki, S., Jokinen, M., Heikkinen, H. I., Nijnik, M., Melnykovych, M., & Kluvánková, T. (2022). “Going out to get in”—Roles of forest conflicts in bottom-linked environmental governance progressing toward socio-political innovations. Environmental Policy and Governance, 32(6), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2020
- Schepers, D. H. (2010). Challenges to legitimacy at the Forest stewardship council. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 279–290.
- Scherer, A. G., Rasche, A., Palazzo, G., & Spicer, A. (2016). Managing for political corporate social responsibility: New challenges and directions for PCSR 2.0. Journal of Management Studies, 53, 273–298.
- Schmalz, S., Graf, J., Julián-Vejar, D., Sittel, J., & Alister Sanhueza, C. (2023). Challenging the three faces of extractivism: The Mapuche struggle and the forestry industry in Chile. Globalizations, 20(3), 365–383.
10.1080/14747731.2022.2091867 Google Scholar
- Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
- Sedlacek, S. (2014). Non-governmental organizations as governance actors for sustainable development: The case of green building councils. Environmental Policy and Governance, 24(4), 247–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1643
- Sepúlveda-Luque, C., Lara-Sutulov, M., Pérez, S., Guerra, F., Rodríguez, C., & Pino, A. (2018). De la invisibilidad a la multiplicidad: movilizaciones, ontologías e imaginarios urbanos en torno a la defensa de los humedales de Valdivia. Revista Austral de Ciencias Sociales, 35, 5–28.
10.4206/rev.austral.cienc.soc.2018.n35-01 Google Scholar
- Sharp, J. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and development: An anthropological perspective. Development Southern Africa, 23(2), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350600707892
10.1080/03768350600707892 Google Scholar
- Smith, W., Neale, T., & Weir, J. K. (2021). Persuasion without policies: The work of reviving indigenous peoples' fire management in southern Australia. Geoforum, 120, 82–92.
- Thevenot, L. (2015). Certifying the world: Power infrastructures and practices in economies of conventional forms. In P. Aspers & N. Dodd (Eds.), Re-imagining economic sociology (pp. 195–223). Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198748465.003.0009 Google Scholar
- Torres-Salinas, R., García, G. A., Carrasco, N., Zambrano-Bigiarini, M., Costa, T., & Bolin, B. (2016). Forestry development, water scarcity, and the mapuche protest for environmental justice in Chile. Ambiente e Sociedade, 19(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4422ASOC150134R1V1912016
10.1590/1809-4422asoc150134r1v1912016 Google Scholar
- Tricallotis, M. (2016). ¿En qué contexto surge la certificación forestal en Chile?: desempeño ambiental, social y económico de empresas no certificadas. Bosque, 37(3), 613–624. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002016000300018
10.4067/S0717-92002016000300018 Google Scholar
- Tsing, A. (2004). Friction: An ethnography of global connection. Princeton University Press.
- Tulaeva, S. (2013). Institutional trust: The process of trust formation in Russian forest villages in accordance with the international system of forest certification. Forest Policy and Economics, 31, 20–27.
- Undurraga, T. (2015). Neoliberalism in Argentina and Chile: common antecedents, divergent paths. Revista de Sociología e. Política, Brasil, 23(55), 11–34. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987315235502
10.1590/1678-987315235502 Google Scholar
- Undurraga, T., & Aguirre, G. (2023). ‘Now they tell me to preserve it’: Changing environmental imaginaries in southern Chile. Geoforum, 141, 103748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103748
10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103748 Google Scholar
- Undurraga, T., Güell, P., & Fergnani, M. (2022). “Supertanker is a hero, the government a villain”: Politicization of Chile's 2017 forest fires in the media. Journal of Cultural Sociology, 16(4), 527–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/17499755211067642
10.1177/17499755211067642 Google Scholar
- Undurraga, T & Marquez, F. 2021. The unfinished development of the frontier: A Karl Polanyi reading of the conflict between the forestry industry, Mapuche communities and the Chilean State. Revista Sociología & Antropología. pp. 69-95. https://doi.org/10.1590/2238-38752021v1113.
10.1590/2238-38752021v1113 Google Scholar
- Visseren-Hamakers, I. J. (2013). Partnerships and sustainable development: The lessons learned from international biodiversity governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23(3), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1612
