Volume 47, Issue 11 pp. 1160-1167
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Application of the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology: A retrospective study in a tertiary institute

Yun-An Chen MD

Yun-An Chen MD

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Chih-Ying Wu MD

Chih-Ying Wu MD

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Chi-Shun Yang MD

Corresponding Author

Chi-Shun Yang MD

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan

Correspondence

Chi-Shun Yang, MD, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, No. 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sector 4, Taichung 40705, Taiwan.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 July 2019
Citations: 35

Abstract

Background

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology has been widely used in the preoperative evaluation of salivary gland lesions. The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) is a tiered risk-stratification scheme designed to standardize reporting and facilitate decision making. We aimed to clarify the validity and diagnostic utility of the MSRSGC-based classification of salivary gland lesions.

Methods

A total of 1020 salivary gland FNA specimens were retrieved between 2008 and 2017, with histologic follow-up data available for 349 specimens. Within the present retrospective study, each specimen with follow-up data was reclassified according to the MSRSGC diagnostic categories: nondiagnostic, nonneoplastic, atypia of undetermined significance (AUS), benign neoplasm, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential (SUMP), suspicious for malignancy (SM), and malignant. The risk of malignancy (ROM) was calculated based on the histologic follow-up data.

Results

The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the MSRSGC-based classification of the malignant potential of salivary gland lesions were 80.1%, 70.4%, 99.2%, 90.5%, and 96.7%, respectively. The ROM calculated for specimens assigned to the nondiagnostic, nonneoplastic, AUS, benign neoplasm, SUMP, SM, and malignant categories were 8.6%, 15.4%, 36.8%, 2.6%, 32.3%, 71.4%, and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion

The present results confirm the validity and diagnostic utility of MSRSGC, supporting its use in clinical practice to help devise adequate management strategies for salivary gland lesions.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.