Urban Civic Network as practice of social change and innovation. A case-study analysis
Alessandra Ricciardelli
Department of Economics and Management, LUM Jean Monnet University, Casamassima, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorNicola Raimo
Department of Economics and Management, LUM Jean Monnet University, Casamassima, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorFrancesco Manfredi
Department of Economics and Management, LUM Jean Monnet University, Casamassima, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Filippo Vitolla
Department of Economics and Management, LUM Jean Monnet University, Casamassima, Italy
Correspondence
Filippo Vitolla, Department of Economics and Management, LUM Jean Monnet University, Casamassima, Italy.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAlessandra Ricciardelli
Department of Economics and Management, LUM Jean Monnet University, Casamassima, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorNicola Raimo
Department of Economics and Management, LUM Jean Monnet University, Casamassima, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorFrancesco Manfredi
Department of Economics and Management, LUM Jean Monnet University, Casamassima, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Filippo Vitolla
Department of Economics and Management, LUM Jean Monnet University, Casamassima, Italy
Correspondence
Filippo Vitolla, Department of Economics and Management, LUM Jean Monnet University, Casamassima, Italy.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Social innovation represents a social practice that aims to meet social needs by involving communities in dialogues through participatory and collaborative approaches. One new and particular solution of social innovation is represented by Urban Civic Networks. However, considering the novelty of this topic, neither the benefits nor the role of public entities in implementing such practice of social innovation, nor the strengths of the implementation process are known, yet. This study aims to fill this gap through the analysis of a single-case study, based upon theories of social innovation and social change, referring to the City of Bari. Results show that implementation of Urban Civic Networks generates both tangible and intangible benefits and demonstrate that local government plays a pivotal and leading role in the implementation process. Finally, they show that the strengths of this practice are connected to bottom-up approaches enabling efficient knowledge management and collaboration.
REFERENCES
- Amin, A., Cameron, A., & Hudson, R. (2002). Placing the social economy. London, England: Routledge.
10.4324/9780203166123 Google Scholar
- Berglund, E., & Peipinen, V. (2018). Creating spaces of insurgent citizenship: Squatting in activist-friendly Helsinki. Urbanities, 8(1), 34–49.
- Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In Contemporary field research, Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 109–126.
- Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (Second ed.). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
- Denzin, N. (1984). The research act. Prentice Hall, NJ: Englewood Cliffs.
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.
- European Commission (2013). Social innovation research in the European Union. Approaches, Findings and Future Directions. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/social_innovation.pdf
- European Economic and Social Committee (2007). The Social Economy in the European Union. Summary of the Report drawn up for the European Economic and Social Committee. Retrieved from https://www.eesc.europa.eu/resources/docs/qe-30-12-790-en-c.pdf
- Franz, H.-W., Hochgerner, J., & Howaldt, J. (2012). Challenge social innovation: An introduction. In H.-W. Franz & J. Hochgerner (Eds.), Challenge social innovation, 1–16. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
10.1007/978-3-642-32879-4_1 Google Scholar
- Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417.
- Gerometta, J., Haussermann, H., & Longo, G. (2005). Social innovation and civil society in urban governance: Strategies for an inclusive city. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2007–2021.
- Heintz, P. (1958). Sozialer Wandel. In R. König (Ed.), Fischer Lexikon Soziologie. Frankfurt a.M., Germany: Fischer.
- Hochgerner, J. (2009). Innovation processes in the dynamics of social change. Innovation cultures. In J. Loudin & K. Schuch (Eds.), Innovation cultures. Challenge and learning strategy, 17–45. Prague, Czech Republic: Filosofia.
- Howaldt, J., & Schwarz, M. (2010). Social innovation: Concepts, research fields and international trends. Aachen, Germany: IMO international monitoring. Retrieved from http://www.sfs.tudortmund.de/odb/Repository/Publication/Doc/1289/IMO_Trendstudie_Howaldt_Schwarz_englische_Version.pdf
- Jessop, B. (2004). Multilevel governance and multilevel metagovernance. Changes in the EU as integral moments in the transformation and reorientation of contemporary statehood. Multi-level governance, 49–74. Oxford, England: OUP.
- Johansson, R. (2003). Case study methodology. A key note speech at the International Conference “Methodologies in Housing Research” organised by the Royal Institute of Technology in cooperation with the International Association of People–Environment Studies, Stockholm, 22–24.
- Katamba, D., Marvin Nkiko, C., & Ademson, C. (2016). Managing stakeholders' influence on embracing business code of conduct and ethics in a local pharmaceutical company: Case of Kampala Pharmaceutical Industries (KPI). Review of International Business and Strategy, 26(2), 261–290.
- Klein, J. L., Fontan, J. M., & Tremblay, D. G. (2009). Social entrepreneurs, local initiatives and social economy: Foundations for a socially innovative strategy to fight against poverty and exclusion. Canadian Journal of Regional Science/Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Régionales, 32(1), 23–42.
- Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space, Translated by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
- MacCallum, D., Moulaert, F., Hiller, J., & Vicari, H. S. (2009). Introduction. In D. MacCallum, F. Moulaert, J. Hillier, & S. Vicari Haddock (Eds.), Social innovation and territorial development, 1–11. Burlington, NJ: Ashgate.
10.1053/j.sodo.2009.03.002 Google Scholar
- McLeod S.A. (2008). Simply psychology: case study method in psychology. Retrieved from www.simplypsychology.org/case-study.html.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Moulaert, F., & Ailenei, O. (2005). Social economy, third sector and solidarity relations: A conceptual synthesis from history to present. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2037–2053.
- Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). Social innovation research: A new stage in innovation analysis. The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research, Cheltenham, UK, 110–130.
10.4337/9781849809993 Google Scholar
- Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). The international handbook on social innovation, collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Cheltenham, England: Elgar.
10.4337/9781849809993 Google Scholar
- Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & González, S. (2005). Towards alternative model(s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969–1990.
- Moulaert, F., & Nussbaumer, J. (2005). The social region. Beyond the territorial dynamics of the learning economy. European Urban and Regional Studies, 12(1), 45–64.
- Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation, social innovator series: Ways to design, develop and grow social innovation. London, England: The Young Foundation.
- Neamtan N. (2002). The social and solidarity economy: Towards an “Alternative” globalisation. Background paper in preparation for the symposium citizenship and globalization: Exploring participation and democracy in a global context, June 14–16 2002. Retrieved from http://base.socioeco.org/docs/social-solidarity_economy.pdf.
- Ricciardelli, A. (2017). The role of universities in the Europe 2020 strategy. The Cases of Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia and Kosovo. Germany: Springer.
- Rüede D., & Lurtz K. (2012). Mapping the various meanings of social innovation: Towards a differentiated understanding of an emerging concept. EBS Business School, Research Paper Series 12-03. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2091039.
- Schäfers, B. (2002). Sozialstruktur und sozialer Wandel in Deutschland. Stuttgart, Germany: Lucius & Lucius.
- Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294–308.
- Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory ( Second ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Swyngedouw, E. (2005). Governance innovation and the citizen: The Janus face of governance-beyond-the-state. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1991–2006.
- Swyngedouw, E. (2009). Civil society, Governmentality and the contradictions of governance-beyond-the-state: The Janus-face of social innovation. In D. MacCallum, F. Moulaert, J. Hillier, & S. Vicari Haddock (Eds.), Social innovation and territorial development, 63–78. Farnham, England: Ashgate.
- WBGU. (2011). Welt im Wandel. Gesellschaftsvertrag für eine Große Transformation. Berlin, Germany: Zusammenfassung für Entscheidungsträger.
- Yin, K. (1993). “Applications of case study research”, Applied social research methods series, Vol. 34. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research design and methods: Applied social research and methods series. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Yin, R. K. (2006). Mixed methods research: Are the methods genuinely integrated or merely parallel? Research in the Schools, 13(1), 41–47.
- Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods: Applied social research methods. London, England: Sage.
- Zapf, W. (2003). Sozialer Wandel. In B. Schäfers (Ed.), Grundbegriffe der Soziologie, 427–433. Leske + Budrich: Opladen.