Volume 24, Issue 3 pp. 231-236
Clinical Investigation
Free to Read

Dobutamine as bridge to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-nitrate therapy in endstage heart failure

T. Barry Levine M.D.

Corresponding Author

T. Barry Levine M.D.

Michigan Institute for Heart Failure and Transplant Care, Botsford General Hospital, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA

Michigan Institute for Heart Failure & Transplant Care Botsford General Hospital 28050 Grand River Avenue Farmington Hills, MI 48336, USASearch for more papers by this author
Arlene B. Levine M.D.

Arlene B. Levine M.D.

Michigan Institute for Heart Failure and Transplant Care, Botsford General Hospital, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
William G. Elliott D.O.

William G. Elliott D.O.

Michigan Institute for Heart Failure and Transplant Care, Botsford General Hospital, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Barbara Narins R.N.

Barbara Narins R.N.

Michigan Institute for Heart Failure and Transplant Care, Botsford General Hospital, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Robert J. Stomel D.O.

Robert J. Stomel D.O.

Michigan Institute for Heart Failure and Transplant Care, Botsford General Hospital, Farmington Hills, Michigan, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 February 2009
Citations: 10

Abstract

Background: Intravenous inotropic intervention in congestive heart failure is generally associated with a poor prognosis and is largely used as a “bridge” to mechanical support or heart transplantation.

Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the inotropic support afforded by dobutamine may serve as a bridge to the introduction and intensification of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-nitrate therapy.

Methods: We studied the efficacy of transitioning inotrope-dependent patients in endstage heart failure from intravenous dobutamine to high-dose ACE inhibitor-nitrates, with 1-year follow-up. Forty-nine sequential dobutamine-dependent patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 17 ± 17% were treated with increasing lisinopril (1.9 ± 1.5 to 46 ± 28 mg/day) and isosorbide dinitrate (7 ± 6 to 229 ± 161 mg/day). Outpatient dobutamine was continued or repeat infusions pursued, as indicated, and dobutamine was tapered when feasible.

Results: During the following year, 14 of 49 patients required repeat dobutamine, with home treatment with dobutamine for 6.3 ± 3.7 months (n = 5). At 1 year, New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification improved from 3.6 ± 0.5 to 1.9 ± 1.0, p < 0.0001; yearly hospitalizations fell from 2.7 ± 2.3 to 1.2 ± 3.0, p = 0.02; and LVEF rose from 17 ± 7% to 24 ± 11%, p < 0.0001. At 1 year, 14 patients who remained dobutamine dependent had significantly more severe symptoms than dobutamine-independent patients (n = 35). Transplant or death occurred in 7 of 14 patients with follow-up dobutamine, and in 5 of 35 patients free of subsequent dobutamine, p = 0.03. Patients with poor outcome (transplant n = 10, death n = 12) continued to be more limited (NYHA 2.7 ± 0.9 vs. 1.7 ± 0.9, p = 0.0002), with more follow-up hospitalizations (3.6 ± 5.4 vs. 0.6 ± 0.8, p = 0.0004), and no improvement in LVEF (17 ± 8 vs. 28 ± 11%, p = 0.003).

Conclusions: Of the patients on dobutamine inotropic support, 70% were successfully transitioned to ACE inhibitor-nitrate therapy, with improved symptoms and LVEF, and with reduced hospitalizations and follow-up dobutamine or transplant. Thirty percent of patients with continued need for dobutamine had a significantly poorer 1-year clinical outcome.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.