Volume 33, Issue 48 p. 215
Natural Products
Full Access

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of a Spongistatin AB-Spiroketal Analogue.

Amos B. Smith III

Amos B. Smith III

Dep. Chem., Univ. Pa., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Search for more papers by this author
R. Michael Corbett

R. Michael Corbett

Dep. Chem., Univ. Pa., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Search for more papers by this author
George R. Pettit

George R. Pettit

Dep. Chem., Univ. Pa., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jean-Charles Chapuis

Jean-Charles Chapuis

Dep. Chem., Univ. Pa., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jean M. Schmidt

Jean M. Schmidt

Dep. Chem., Univ. Pa., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ernest Hamel

Ernest Hamel

Dep. Chem., Univ. Pa., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Search for more papers by this author
M. Katherine Jung

M. Katherine Jung

Dep. Chem., Univ. Pa., Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 May 2010

Abstract

For Abstract see ChemInform Abstract in Full Text.

ChemInform Abstract

The synthesis of the spongistatin AB-spiroketal mimic (VI) is carried out with dithianepentanol (I), derived via a one-pot unsymmetrical linchpin dithiane coupling of epoxides. Dithiane removal and acid treatment afford spiroketal (II), which is selectively silylated and acetylated to give, after deprotection, the title analogue (VI). Cytotoxic data on this compound, as well as those of a recently described parent spongistatin congener reveal that neither (VI) nor its parent compound are active against several human cancer cell lines. Moreover, no effects of these compounds are observed in an antitubulin activity test.

chemical structure image

    The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.