Volume 103, Issue 6 pp. 1050-1061
ORIGINAL ARTICLE - CLINICAL SCIENCE

Minimally invasive procedures for right side infective endocarditis: A targeted literature review

Weijia Wang MSc

Weijia Wang MSc

Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Shinobu Itagaki MD

Shinobu Itagaki MD

Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Natalia Egorova PhD

Corresponding Author

Natalia Egorova PhD

Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, New York, USA

Correspondence Natalia Egorova, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 February 2024

Abstract

Introduction

Right-side infective endocarditis (RSIE) is caused by microorganisms and develops into intracardiac and extracardiac complications with high in-hospital and 1-year mortality. Treatments involve antibiotic and surgical intervention. However, those presenting with extremes e.g. heart failure, or septic shock who are not ideal candidates for conventional medical therapy might benefit from minimally invasive procedures.

Objective

This review summarizes existing observational studies that reported minimally invasive procedures to debulk vegetation due to infective endocarditis either on valve or cardiac implantable electronic devices.

Methods

A targeted literature review was conducted to identify studies published in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Database from January 1, 2015 to June 5, 2023. The efficacy and/or effectiveness of minimally invasive procedural interventions to debulk vegetation due to RSIE were summarized following PRISMA guidelines.

Results

A total of 11 studies with 208 RSIE patients were included. There were 9 studies that assessed the effectiveness of the AngioVac system and 2 assessed the Penumbra system. Overall procedure success rate was 87.9%. Among 8 studies that reported index hospitalization, 4 studies reported no death, while the other 4 studies reported 10 deaths.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that multiple systems can provide minimally invasive procedure options for patients with RSIE with high procedural success. However, there are mixed results regarding complications and mortality rates. Further large cohort studies or randomized clinical trials are warranted to assess and/or compare the efficacy and safety of these systems.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

Weijia Wang is a full-time employee at and holds stock of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available in Cochrane Central Database at https://www.cochranelibrary.com/central.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.