Volume 101, Issue 2 pp. 299-307
ORIGINAL ARTICLE - CLINICAL SCIENCE

Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy for 1–3 months after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Amit Rout MD

Amit Rout MD

Division of Cardiology, University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Abhishek Sharma MD

Abhishek Sharma MD

Division of Cardiology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, New Jersey, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sohail Ikram MD

Sohail Ikram MD

Division of Cardiology, University of Louisville, Kentucky, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Aakash Garg MD, FSCAI

Corresponding Author

Aakash Garg MD, FSCAI

Division of Cardiology, Ellis Hospital, New York, USA

Correspondence Aakash Garg, MD, FSCAI, Division of Cardiology, Ellis Hospital, 1101 Nott St, Schenectady, NY 12308, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 December 2022
Citations: 1

Abstract

Background

The optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration and regimen in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using current generation drug eluting stents (DES) is still unclear.

Aims

To compare the safety and efficacy of short-term DAPT (S-DAPT) with longer duration DAPT (l-DAPT) after contemporary PCI.

Methods

We searched for studies comparing S-DAPT (≤3 months) followed by single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor against L-DAPT (6−12 months) after PCI with current generation DES. Primary end-points of interest were major bleeding and stent thrombosis (ST) at 1 year. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios with 95% CIs.

Results

Eleven RCTs (n = 48,946) were included in the primary analysis. Major bleeding was significantly lower with S-DAPT (n = 24,424) (odd ratio [OR 0.65; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.52−0.80]) compared with L-DAPT (n = 24,486). There were no differences in ST between the two groups [OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.97−1.63]. There were no significant differences in risks of all-cause death, cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction between S-DAPT and L-DAPT groups. In a subgroup analysis, there was borderline significantly higher ST with 1 month S-DAPT [1.39; 1.0–1.92], but not with 3 months S-DAPT [1.07; 0.70−1.64], when compared to L-DAPT. Finally, there were no significant treatment interactions observed when trials using SAPT with aspirin were compared with those using P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy.

Conclusion

Among patients undergoing current generation DES implantation, S-DAPT for 1−3 months reduces major bleeding without an increase in ischemic events compared with L-DAPT. Three months S-DAPT might provide a better risk-benefit profile based on current analysis. Further study is needed to define the SAPT of choice after 1−3 months DAPT.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the articles.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.