Volume 97, Issue 5 pp. 919-924
ORIGINAL STUDIES

Impact of preexisting coronary arterial disease in patients undergoing percutaneous mitral valve repair (MitraClip)

Kristina Gifft DO

Kristina Gifft DO

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri Hospital, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jad Omran MD

Jad Omran MD

Department of Cardiology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Fadi Ghrair MD

Fadi Ghrair MD

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri Hospital, Columbia, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Haytham Allaham MD

Haytham Allaham MD

Department of Cardiology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mohammad Eniezat MS

Mohammad Eniezat MS

School of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan

Search for more papers by this author
Obai Abdullah MD

Obai Abdullah MD

Department of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Tariq Enezate MD

Corresponding Author

Tariq Enezate MD

Department of Cardiology, Harbor Medical Center-University of California Log Angeles, Torrance, California, USA

Correspondence

Tariq Enezate, MD

Department of Cardiology, Harbor Medical Center-University of California Log Angeles 1000 West Carson St, Torrance, CA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 November 2020
Citations: 1

Abstract

Introduction

Percutaneous mitral valve repair with Mitraclip device has been approved for the treatment of symptomatic mitral valve regurgitation in patients deemed high surgical risk. It's unclear whether the presence of preexisting coronary arterial disease (CAD) affects the postprocedural outcomes of Mitraclip.

Methods

The study population was extracted from the 2016 Nationwide Readmissions Data (NRD) using the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modifications/Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-CM/PCS) for Mitraclip, preexisting CAD, and postprocedural complications. Study primary endpoints included in-hospital all-cause mortality, cardiogenic shock, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), acute kidney injury (AKI), stroke, acute respiratory failure, length of hospital stay (LOS), and 30-day readmission rate.

Results

A total of 2,539 discharges that had Mitraclip during the index hospitalization, 62.3% had history of preexisting CAD. Mean age was 78.5 years and 46.6% were female. Overall, the presence of preexisting CAD was associated with higher AMI (1.6 vs. 0.4%, p < .01), however, there was no significant differences in terms of in-hospital all-cause mortality (2.2 vs. 2.6%, p = .52), cardiogenic shock (3.4 vs. 4.1%, p = .39), AKI (14.7 vs. 13.6%, p = .43), stroke (0.9 vs. 0.5%, p = .31), acute respiratory failure (9.7 vs. 8.8%, p = .43), LOS (5.3 vs. 5.3 days, p = .85) or 30-day readmission rate (14.6 vs. 14.4%, p = .92). These results persisted after adjustment for baseline characteristics. The subgroup of CAD patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (22.5 vs. 2.0%, p < .01), cardiogenic shock (25.0 vs. 3.3%, p < .01), AMI (22.5 vs. 0.8%, p < .01), AKI (55.0 vs. 13.7%, p < .01), stroke (10.0 vs. 0.6%, p < .01), acute respiratory failure (45.0 vs. 8.8%, p < .01), and longer LOS (21.5 vs. 5.1 days, p < .01), however there was no significant difference in 30-day readmission rate (15.0 vs. 14.5%, p = .95).

Conclusions

Preexisting CAD was associated with higher in-hospital AMI post-Mitraclip but with comparable mortality and other morbidities. Patients who received PCI during the same index hospitalization had higher in-hospital mortality and morbidity.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data source of this study is the 2016 Nationwide Readmission Dataset (NRD). Which is a publically available dataset from the source (https://www.distributor.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/SpecialPages/Logon.aspx), however, sharing data might be subject to third party restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.