Volume 94, Issue 1 pp. 139-148
PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE

Drug-coated balloon versus plain old balloon angioplasty in femoropopliteal disease: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Mahesh Anantha-Narayanan MD

Mahesh Anantha-Narayanan MD

Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
Samit M. Shah MD, PhD

Samit M. Shah MD, PhD

Section of Cardiovascular Diseases, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut

Search for more papers by this author
Qurat-Ul-Ain Jelani MD

Qurat-Ul-Ain Jelani MD

Section of Cardiovascular Diseases, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut

Search for more papers by this author
Santiago Garcia MD

Santiago Garcia MD

Cardiovascular Division, Minneapolis Heart Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
Costin Ionescu MD, PhD

Costin Ionescu MD, PhD

Section of Cardiovascular Diseases, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut

Search for more papers by this author
Christopher Regan MD

Christopher Regan MD

Section of Cardiovascular Diseases, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut

Search for more papers by this author
Carlos Mena-Hurtado MD

Corresponding Author

Carlos Mena-Hurtado MD

Section of Cardiovascular Diseases, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut

Correspondence

Carlos Mena-Hurtado, MD, Section of Cardiovascular Disease, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 March 2019
Citations: 40
[Correction added on March 11, 2019, after first online publication: The Conflict of Interests statement was updated.]

Abstract

Background

Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has emerged as a mainstay of therapy for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) involving the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries. We performed a meta-analysis including all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to date which compare DCB to plain balloon angioplasty (POBA) in femoropopliteal disease (FPD).

Methods

Five databases were analyzed including EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web-of-Science from January 2000 to September 2018 for RCTs comparing DCB to POBA in patients with FPD. Heterogeneity was determined using Cochrane's Q-statistics. Random effects model was used.

Results

Twenty-two RCTs, including five trials of in-stent restenosis (ISR) intervention, with 3,217 patients were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was approximately 21.6 ± 14.4 months. Overall, DCB use was associated with a 51% reduction in target vessel revascularization (TLR) when compared to POBA at follow-up (relative risk [RR]: 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.40–0.61, P < 0.0001). Rates of TLR were 45% lower in the DCB group when compared to POBA in patients with ISR (RR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.37–0.81, P = 0.002). DCB was associated with lower rates of binary stenosis, late lumen loss and higher primary safety endpoints. Major amputation and mortality were not different between DCB and POBA.

Conclusions

Use of DCBs is associated with improved vessel patency and a lower risk of TLR when compared to POBA in patients with FPD, especially in the setting of ISR. There was no difference in mortality between DCB and POBA in our meta-analysis. Extended follow-up of the available RCT data will be essential to analyze long-term device-related mortality.

CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

Dr Carlos Mena is a consultant for Cook. Dr Garcia is a consultant for Surmodics, Osprey medical, Medtronic, Edwards Lifesciences, Abbott and Boston Scientific. Dr Garcia has research grants from Research grants from Edwards Life Sciences, Minnesota Veterans Research Foundation, and VA Office of Research and Development. Dr Regan is a consultant for Medtronic.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.