Volume 72, Issue 7 pp. 917-924
Coronary Artery Disease

Comparison between ticlopidine and clopidogrel in patients undergoing primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction: Results from the CADILLAC trial

Alexandra J. Lansky MD

Corresponding Author

Alexandra J. Lansky MD

Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York

Department of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York

Columbia University Medical Center, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, 55 East 59th Street, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10022Search for more papers by this author
Yoshihiro Tsuchiya MD

Yoshihiro Tsuchiya MD

Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Micheal Brener BSc

Micheal Brener BSc

Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Roxana Mehran MD

Roxana Mehran MD

Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York

Department of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Ecaterina Cristea MD

Ecaterina Cristea MD

Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Cody Pietras BA

Cody Pietras BA

Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Cindy L. Grines MD

Cindy L. Grines MD

Department of Cardiology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan

Search for more papers by this author
David A. Cox MD

David A. Cox MD

Department of Cardiology, Mid Carolina Cardiology, Charlotte, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Eulogio Garcia MD

Eulogio Garcia MD

Department of Cardiology, Hospital Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
James E. Tcheng MD

James E. Tcheng MD

Department of Cardiology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Giulio Guagliumi MD

Giulio Guagliumi MD

Department of Cardiology, Ospedali Riuniti di Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas Stuckey MD

Thomas Stuckey MD

Department of Cardiology, Moses Cone Memorial Hospital, Greensboro, North Carolina

Search for more papers by this author
Mark Turco MD

Mark Turco MD

Department of Cardiology, Doylestown Hospital, Doylestown, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
John D. Carroll MD

John D. Carroll MD

Department of Cardiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado

Search for more papers by this author
Barry D. Rutherford MD

Barry D. Rutherford MD

Department of Cardiology, St. Luke's Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri

Search for more papers by this author
Martin B. Leon MD

Martin B. Leon MD

Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York

Department of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey Moses MD

Jeffrey Moses MD

Department of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
Gregg W. Stone MD

Gregg W. Stone MD

Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York

Department of Cardiology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 November 2008
Citations: 1

Conflict of interest: Nothing to report.

Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this article is to examine whether clopidogrel and ticlopidine treatments produce similar clinical outcomes for patients receiving primary stenting for acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Background:

Prior studies have yielded conflicting results on the relative safety and efficacy of clopidogrel and ticlopidine after stent implantation, warranting an evaluation in primary stenting for AMI.

Methods:

In the multicenter, prospective CADILLAC trial, patients undergoing primary infarct stenting were treated at operator discretion with either ticlopidine (931 patients) or clopidogrel (163 patients) and then followed for 1 year. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable except for baseline TIMI 0/1 flow (72.5% clopidogrel vs. 63.9% ticlopidine, P = 0.04).

Results:

Patients receiving clopidogrel had more recurrent ischemia in hospital (6.1 vs. 2.8%, P = 0.02) and at 30 days (10.5 vs. 5.8%, P = 0.02), more moderate and severe bleeding at 30 days (7.4 vs. 2.7%, P = 0.002), and similar rates of stent thrombosis out to 1 year (P = 0.11). By multivariable analysis, clopidogrel use was an independent predictor for recurrent ischemia in hospital (P = 0.0002), and at 30 days (P = 0.012); and of moderate and severe bleeding in hospital (P = 0.002), and at 30 days (P = 0.001).

Conclusions:

Despite thienopyridines similarities, their efficacy may be different within the first 30 days of primary stenting for AMI. A prospective, randomized trial is required to confirm these findings. © 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.