Volume 14, Issue 3 pp. 206-212
Technical Note
Full Access

Clinical experience with the Monorail balloon catheter for coronary angioplasty

Leo Finci MD

Leo Finci MD

Cardiology Center, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Dr. Bernhard Meier MD

Corresponding Author

Dr. Bernhard Meier MD

Cardiology Center, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

Cardiology Center, University Hospital, 1211 Geneva 4, SwitzerlandSearch for more papers by this author
Paul Roy MD

Paul Roy MD

Cardiology Center, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Giuseppe Steffenino MD

Giuseppe Steffenino MD

Cardiology Center, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Wilhelm Rutishauser MD

Wilhelm Rutishauser MD

Cardiology Center, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 1988
Citations: 18

Abstract

The Monorail balloon catheter is distinctly different from other current balloon catheters: the guidewire passes through the balloon itself, exits the catheter proximal to the balloon, and runs alongside its small shaft (3 French) through the guiding catheter. Monorail coronary angioplasty was attempted in 61 patients on 73 lesions with balloons from 2.0 to 3.7 mm. Angiographic success was obtained in 66 lesions (90%). For 15 lesions, balloon exchanges were needed. In three lesions, the Monorail balloon failed to cross the lesion, while a standard balloon succeeded; two lesions could not be crossed with any balloon. Vessel occlusion occurred in four patients: two had emergency surgery without infarct (one died suddenly 4 days later and one had a stroke 1 day later), one was recanalized with a standard balloon, and one had a myocardial infarct. Continuous infusion of urokinase was used until patient 3 in whom problems with the delivery system led to cardiocerebral air embolization (with complete recovery). No thrombotic complications were observed in the subsequent 58 patients with only a bolus of 10,000 U of heparin. The Monorail balloon facilitates contrast injections and balloon exchanges but appears more difficult to pass through tight lesions. Omission of the previously recommended infusion with a thrombolytic agent proved safe.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.