Attachment representations and factitious illness by proxy: relevance for assessment of parenting capacity in child maltreatment
Corresponding Author
Dr Gwen Adshead
West London Mental Health NHS Trust, Camden and Islington MHT
Broadmoor Hospital, Crowthorne, Berkshire RG45 7EG, UK.Search for more papers by this authorKerry Bluglass
Woodbourne Priory Hospital,and University of Birmingham
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Dr Gwen Adshead
West London Mental Health NHS Trust, Camden and Islington MHT
Broadmoor Hospital, Crowthorne, Berkshire RG45 7EG, UK.Search for more papers by this authorKerry Bluglass
Woodbourne Priory Hospital,and University of Birmingham
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The Department of Health assessment framework document indicates a need to assess parenting capacity in parents involved in child protection procedures. Parenting capacity includes an assessment of the parent's own experience of parenting as a child. In this paper, we present data from a pilot study of attachment representations in a sample of mothers exhibiting factitious illness by proxy behaviours. We suggest that attachment representations can help to explain how such mothers fail to care for their children, and argue that attachment theory generally is helpful for understanding how normal and abnormal caregiving behavioural systems develop. We conclude that it is useful to understand child maltreatment, at least in part, as a failure of caregiving in the parent as a result of parental insecurity of attachment. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
References
- Adshead G, Brooke D, Jenner S, Samuels M, Southall D. 2000. The maternal behaviours associated with smothering: a preliminary descriptive study. Child Abuse and Neglect 24: 1175–1183.
- Ainsworth M, Blehar M, Waters E, Wal S. 1978. Patterns of Attachment: A Psychological Study of the Strange Situation. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, NJ.
- Allen JP, Hauser S, Borman Spurrell E. 1996. Attachment theory as a framework for understanding sequelae of severe adolescent psychopathology: an 11 year follow up study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64: 254–263.
- Bools C, Neale B, Meadow R. 1994. Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy: a study of psychopathology. Child Abuse and Neglect 18: 773–788.
- Bowlby J. 1969. Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Attachment. Hogarth Press: London.
- Bowlby J. 1980. Attachment and Loss. Vol. 3. Loss. Hogarth Press: London.
- Cicchetti D, Rogosch F. 1994. The toll of child maltreatment on the developing child. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America 3: 759–776.
10.1016/S1056-4993(18)30469-3 Google Scholar
- Cleaver H, Unell I, Aldgate J. 1999. Children's Needs—Parenting Capacity. The Stationery Office: London.
- Craig T, Boardman A, Mills K et al. 1993. The South London Somatisation Study Part I. Longitudinal course and the influence of early life experience. British Journal of Psychiatry 163: 579–588.
- Crittenden P. 1996. Research on maltreating families: implications for intervention. In The APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment. J Briere et al. (eds). Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA; 158–175.
- Crittenden P, Partridge M, Claussen A. 1991. Family patterns of relationship in normative and dysfunctional families. Development and Psychopathology 3: 491–512.
10.1017/S0954579400007653 Google Scholar
- DeLozier P. 1982. Attachment theory and child abuse. In The Place of Attachment in Human Behaviour, CM Parkes, J Stevenson-Hinde (eds). Tavistock: London; 95–117.
- Department of Health/Home Office/Department of Education and Employment. 1999. Working Together to Protect Children. The Stationery Office: London.
- Department of Health/Department of Education and Employment/Home Office. 2000. Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and their Families. The Stationery Office: London.
- Eminson M. 2000. Background. In MSBP Abuse: A Practical Approach, M Eminson, RJ Postlethwaite (eds.) Butterworth Heinemann: London: 17–70.
- Fonagy P, Target M, Steele M, Steele H, Leigh T, Levinson A, Kennedy R. 1997. Morality, disruptive behaviour, borderline personality disorder, crime and their relationship to attachment. In Attachment and Psychopathology, L Atkinson, K Zucker (eds). Guilford: London; 223–276.
- Fraiberg S, Adelson E, Shapiro V. 1975. Ghosts in the nursery: a psychoanalytic approach to the problems of impaired mother–infant relationships. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry 14: 387–421.
- George C. 1996. A representational perspective of child abuse and prevention: internal working models of attachment and caregiving. Child Abuse and Neglect 20: 411–424.
- George C, Solomon J. 1996. Representational models of relationships: links between caregiving and attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal 17: 198–216.
- Hesse E. 1999. The Adult Attachment Interview: historical and current perspectives. In Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research and Clinical Applications. J Cassidy, P Shaver (eds). Guilford Press: New York: 395–433.
- Howe D, Brandon M, Hinings D, Schoflied G. 1999. Attachment Theory, Child Maltreatment and Family Support. MacMillan: London.
10.1007/978-1-349-14975-9 Google Scholar
- Jureidini J, Donald T. 2001. Child abuse specific to the medical system. In Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy: Current Issues in Assessment, Treatment and Research. G Adshead, D Brooke (eds). Imperial Press: London; 39–47.
10.1142/9781848161528_0003 Google Scholar
- Kraemer GW. 1992. A psychobiological theory of attachment. Behavioural and Brain Sciences 15: 493–511.
- Lyons-Ruth K, Block D. 1996. The disturbed caregiving system: relations among childhood trauma, maternal caregiving and infant affect and attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal 17: 257–275.
- Meadow R. 1977. Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy: the hinterland of child abuse. Lancet 2: 343–345.
- Mitchell M. 1990. Attachment antecedents and socio-cultural factors in hispanic mothers' physical abuse of their children. In Research Explorations in Adult Attachment, K Pottharst (ed.). Peter Lang: New York; 129–197.
- Morton N, Browne K. 1998. Theory and observation of attachment and its relation to child maltreatment: a review. Child Abuse and Neglect 22: 1093–1104.
- Rosenstein DS, Horowitz HA. 1996. Adolescent attachment and psychopathology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64: 244–253.
- Schreier H, Libow J. 1993. Hurting for Love: Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome. Guilford: New York.
- Solomon J, George C. 1996. Defining the caregiving system: towards a theory of caregiving. Infant Mental Health Journal 17: 183–197.
- Solomon J, George C. 1999. The caregiving system in mothers of infants: a comparison of divorcing and married mothers. Attachment and Human Development 2: 171–190.
10.1080/14616739900134221 Google Scholar
- van Ijzendoorn M, Bakermans-Kranenburg M. 1996. Attachment representations in mothers, fathers, adolescents and clinical groups: a meta-analytic search for normative data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 64: 8–21.
- van Ijzendoorn M, Feldbrugge J, Derks F, de Ruiter C, Verhagen M, Philipse M, van der Staak C, Riksen-Walraven J. 1997. Attachment representations of personality disordered offenders. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 67: 449–459.
- Welldon E. 2001. The extraordinary case of Mrs H. In Munchausen's Syndrome by Proxy: Current Issues in Assessment, Treatment and Research, G Adshead, D Brooke (eds). Imperial Press: London; 49–59.
10.1142/9781848161528_0004 Google Scholar