Volume 8, Issue 1 e70097
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Gender Diversity and Environmental, Social, and Governance: Unlocking Solutions to Corporate Risk

Mohammed W. A. Saleh

Corresponding Author

Mohammed W. A. Saleh

Department of Accounting and Auditing, Palestine Technical University—Kadoorie, Tulkarm, Palestine

Correspondence:

Mohammed W. A. Saleh ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Sajead Mowafaq Alshdaifat

Sajead Mowafaq Alshdaifat

Financial and Accounting Sciences Department, Faculty of Business, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan

Search for more papers by this author
Mohammad Fawzi Shubita

Mohammad Fawzi Shubita

Accounting Department, Faculty of Finance and Business, The World Islamic Science & Education University, Amman, Jordan

Search for more papers by this author
Marwan Mansour

Marwan Mansour

Accounting Department, Business Faculty, Amman Arab University, Amman, Jordan

Jadara Research Center, Jadara University, Irbid, Jordan

Search for more papers by this author
Abdalwali Lutfi

Abdalwali Lutfi

College of Business Administration, The University of Kalba, Kalba, UAE

Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan

MEU Research Unit, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 17 March 2025
Citations: 6

Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

[Correction added on 26 March 2025, after first online publication: The first name of the second author has been corrected from ‘Sajed’ to ‘Sajead’ in this version.]

ABSTRACT

This study examines the relationship between Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) practices and corporate risk in Asian countries, emphasizing the moderating role of board gender diversity (BGD). Using a panel dataset of 15,496 observations from Asian firms between 2008 and 2020, the analysis employs the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) model to address potential endogeneity issues. The findings indicate that stronger ESG practices significantly reduce corporate risk, enhance financial stability, and mitigate regulatory and market volatility exposure. Furthermore, the results highlight that higher BGD amplifies this risk-reduction effect, suggesting that diverse boards contribute to better decision-making and risk management. Policy Implications: These findings underscore the importance of regulatory frameworks that encourage ESG adoption and board diversity. Policymakers should incentivize companies to integrate ESG principles and implement gender diversity policies, such as board quotas or disclosure requirements, to enhance corporate resilience and sustainable economic growth.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.