Volume 342, Issue 9-10 pp. 1185-1190
PROCEEDING

What defines a compact symmetric object? A carefully vetted sample of compact symmetric objects

Anthony C. S. Readhead

Corresponding Author

Anthony C. S. Readhead

Owens Valley Radio Observatory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Correspondence

Anthony C. S. Readhead, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Sebastian Kiehlmann

Sebastian Kiehlmann

Institute of Astrophysics, Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas, Heraklion, Greece

Department of Physics, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew L. Lister

Matthew L. Lister

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sandra O'Neill

Sandra O'Neill

Owens Valley Radio Observatory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Timothy J. Pearson

Timothy J. Pearson

Owens Valley Radio Observatory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Evan Sheldahl

Evan Sheldahl

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Aneta Siemiginowska

Aneta Siemiginowska

Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Gregory B. Taylor

Gregory B. Taylor

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Peter N. Wilkinson

Peter N. Wilkinson

Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 08 November 2021
Citations: 3

Funding information: Goddard Space Flight Center, NAS8-03060; H2020 European Research Council, 771282; NASA

Abstract

Compact symmetric objects (CSOs), young jetted-active galactic nuclei of overall projected size <1 kpc, are of great interest due to their youth and evolution. The classification was introduced to distinguish between ∼95% of powerful compact extragalactic radio sources in flux density limited samples that are dominated by asymmetric emission due to relativistic beaming from jets aligned close to the line of sight and ∼5% of objects that are not. The original classification criteria were (a) overall projected diameter smaller than 1 kpc, (b) identified center of activity, and (c) symmetric jet structure about the center. There is confusion and erosion of the value of the CSO classification due to misclassifications. Many jets contain compact bright features outside the core, resulting in a gigahertz peaked spectrum total spectrum and a “compact double” appearance, and some objects with jet axes aligned close to the line of sight appear symmetric because the approaching jet is projected on both sides of the core. To eliminate the confusion, we propose adding (d) slow radio variability and (e) low apparent velocity of bright features moving along the jets to the above CSO criteria. We are compiling a catalog of CSOs using these five criteria to eliminate the confusion of Doppler boosting.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.