Strong dependence in the nominal exchange rates of the Polish zloty
Corresponding Author
L. A. Gil-Alana
Department of Economics, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
Faculty of Economics, Universidad de Navarra, Edificio Biblioteca, Entrada Este, E-31080 Pamplona, SpainSearch for more papers by this authorM. Nazarski
Department of Economics, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
L. A. Gil-Alana
Department of Economics, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
Faculty of Economics, Universidad de Navarra, Edificio Biblioteca, Entrada Este, E-31080 Pamplona, SpainSearch for more papers by this authorM. Nazarski
Department of Economics, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
We examine the nominal exchange rates of six currencies (Canadian, Australian and U.S. dollars, euro, Japanese yen and U.K. pound) against the Polish zloty by means of statistical techniques based on unit roots and other long memory processes. We use both parametric and semiparametric methods for estimating and testing integer and fractional orders of integration at the long run or zero frequency. The results show that unit roots are likely to occur in relation with the U.S. and the Canadian dollars, the Japanese yen and the U.K. pound. However, for the Australian dollar and the euro, this hypothesis is rejected in favour of smaller degrees of integration, implying mean reversion in their behaviour. Thus, for the former currencies, in the event of an exogenous shock affecting the exchange rates, strong policy actions must be required to bring the variables back to their original levels. On the other hand, for the Australian dollar and the euro, there exists less need of action since the series will return to their levels sometime in the future. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- 1 Nelson CR, Plosser CIP. Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: some evidence and implications. Journal of Monetary Economics 1982; 10: 139–162.
- 2 Engle RF, Granger CWJ. Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 1987; 55: 251–276.
- 3 Froot KA, Rogoff K. Perspectives on PPP and long-run real exchange rates. NBER Working Paper No. 4952, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA, 1994.
- 4 Rogoff K. The purchasing power parity puzzle. Journal of Economic Literature 1996; 34(2): 647–668.
- 5 MacDonald R. Long-run exchange rate modeling—a survey of the recent evidence. IMF Staff Papers 1995; 42(3): 437–489.
- 6 Caporale GM, Pittis N. Revisiting the long-run relationship between real exchange rates and real interest differentials: a productivity differential approach. D.P. no. 16-98, Centre for Economic Forecasting, London Business School, 1998.
- 7 Dornbusch R. Expectations and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy 1976; 84: 1161–1176.
- 8 Balassa B. The purchasing power doctrine: a reappraisal. Journal of Political Economy 1964; 72: 584–596.
- 9 Samuelson P. Theoretical notes on trade problems. Review of Economics and Statistics 1964; 46: 145–154.
- 10 Mussa M. A model of exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy 1982; 90: 74–104.
- 11 Mussa M. Our recent experience with fixed and flexible exchange rates. Journal of Monetary Economics 1976; 3: 123–141.
- 12 Logue DE, Sweeney RJ, Willett TD. Speculative behavior of foreign exchange rates during the current float. Journal of Business Research 1978; 6: 159–174.
- 13 Meese RA, Singleton KL. On unit roots and the empirical modeling of exchange rates. Journal of Finance 1981; 37: 1029–1035.
- 14 Baillie RT, Bollerslev T. Common stochastic trends in a system of exchange rates. Journal of Finance 1989; 44: 167–181.
- 15 Cheung YW. Long memory in foreign-exchange rates. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1993; 11: 93–101.
- 16 Sweeney RS. Mean reversion in G-10 nominal rates. Working Paper, Georgetown University, 2001.
- 17 Hakio CS, Rush M. Cointegration: how short is the long run? Journal of International Money and Finance 1991; 10: 571–581.
- 18 Sephton PS, Larsen HK. Tests of exchange market efficiency: fragile evidence from cointegration tests. Journal of International Money and Finance 1991; 10: 561–570.
- 19 Diebold FX, Gardeazabal J, Yilmaz K. On cointegration and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Finance 1994; 49: 727–735.
- 20 Johansen S. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 1988; 12: 231–254.
- 21 Syczewska EM. Analogie pomiedzy kursami zlotowymi i dolarowymi na podstawie testow kointegracji i przyczynowosci. In Modelowanie Procesow Ekonomicznych, W Dziubdziela, A Orlowski (eds). WSH: Kielce, 2002; 145–152.
- 22 Syczewska EM. Analiza niestacjonarnosci kursu walutowego USD/PLN na podstawie danych i miesiecznych. In Rocznik Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych, T Szapiro (ed.). NBP: Warszawa, 2002, vol. 10, 159–175.
- 23 Trenkler C. The Polish exchange rate system: a cointegration analysis. Empirical Economics 2003; 28: 839–860.
10.1007/s00181-003-0166-4 Google Scholar
- 24 Kocenda E. Disparities of Exchange Rates in CEE Countries, CERGE, Charles University in Praque: Czech Republic, 2001.
- 25 Fuller WA. Introduction to Statistical Time Series. Wiley: New York, NY, 1976.
- 26 Dickey DA, Fuller WA. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1979; 74: 427–431.
- 27 Phillips PCB, Perron P. Testing for a unit root in a time series regression. Biometrika 1988; 75: 335–346.
- 28 Kwiatkowski D, Phillips PCB, Schmidt P, Shin Y. Testing the null hypothesis of stationarity against the alternative of a unit root. Journal of Econometrics 1992; 54: 159–178.
- 29 Diebold FX, Rudebusch G. On the power of Dickey–Fuller tests against fractional alternatives. Economic Letters 1991; 35: 155–160.
- 30 Hassler U, Wolters J. On the power of unit root tests against fractional alternatives. Economics Letters 1994; 45: 1–5.
- 31 Lee D, Schmidt P. On the power of the KPSS test of stationarity against fractionally integrated alternatives. Journal of Econometrics 1996; 73: 285–302.
- 32 Engel C. The forward discount anomaly and the risk premium. Journal of Empirical Finance 1996; 3: 123–191.
10.1016/0927-5398(95)00016-X Google Scholar
- 33 Baillie RT, Bollerslev T. The long memory of the forward premium. Journal of International Money and Finance 1994; 13: 565–571.
- 34 Cochrane JH. How big is the random walk in GNP? Journal of Political Economy 1988; 96: 893–920.
- 35 Lo AW, MacKinley AC. Stock market prices do not follow a random walk: evidence from a simple specification test. Review of Financial Studies 1988; 1: 41–66.
- 36 Cecchetti SG, Lam PS. Variance-ratio tests: small-sample properties with an application to international output data. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1994; 12: 177–186.
- 37 Smith J, Taylor N, Yadav S. Comparing the bias and misspecification in ARFIMA models. Journal of Time Series Analysis 1997; 18: 507–527.
- 38 Diebold FX, Rudebusch GD. Long memory and persistence in aggregate output. Journal of Monetary Economics 1989; 24: 189–209.
- 39 Baillie RT. Long memory processes and fractional integration in econometrics. Journal of Econometrics 1996; 73: 5–59.
- 40 Gil-Alana LA, Robinson PM. Testing of unit roots and other nonstationary hypotheses in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Econometrics 1997; 80: 241–268.
- 41 Robinson PM. Efficient tests of nonstationary hypotheses. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1994; 89: 1420–1437.
- 42 Sowell F. Maximum likelihood estimation of stationary univariate fractionally integrated time series models. Journal of Econometrics 1992; 53: 165–188.
- 43 Robinson PM. Gaussian semiparametric estimation of long range dependence. Annals of Statistics 1995; 23: 1630–1661.
- 44 Bloomfield P. An exponential model in the spectrum of a scalar time series. Biometrika 1973; 60: 217–226.