Volume 132, Issue 23
Article

Flow-induced solidification of high-impact polypropylene copolymer compositions: Morphological and mechanical effects

Martin van Drongelen

Martin van Drongelen

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Materials Technology Institute, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Markus Gahleitner

Markus Gahleitner

Borealis Polyolefine GmbH, Innovation Headquarters, St. Peterstr. 25, 4021 Linz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Anne B. Spoelstra

Anne B. Spoelstra

Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Laboratory of Polymer Technology, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Leon E. Govaert

Leon E. Govaert

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Materials Technology Institute, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Gerrit W. M. Peters

Corresponding Author

Gerrit W. M. Peters

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Materials Technology Institute, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB, Eindhoven, the Netherlands

Correspondence to: G. Peters (E-mail: [email protected])Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 March 2015
Citations: 10

ABSTRACT

Polypropylene-based impact copolymers are a complex composition of matrix material, a dispersed phase and many optional modifiers. The final heterophasic morphology of such systems is influenced significantly by the processing step, adding an additional level of complexity to understanding the structure-property relation. This topic has hardly been studied so far. The effect of thermal history and shear flow on the solidification process of three different compositions of a polypropylene-based impact copolymer, i.e., one base material and two compounds with either high density polyethylene or ethylene-co-octene added, is investigated. Samples are examined using differential scanning calorimetry, extended dilatometry, transmissions electron microscopy, and finally, tensile testing. With flow, the materials show pronounced flow-enhanced crystallization of the matrix material and deformed filler content. Compared to the base polymer, the stress–strain response of the compounded samples shows a lower yield stress and more pronounced influence of shear, reflected in the increasing strain hardening modulus. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 42040.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.