Volume 82, Issue 8 pp. 1963-1970

Analysis of the phase partitioning of additives in rubber-modified plastics

Patrick B. Smith

Corresponding Author

Patrick B. Smith

The Dow Chemical Company, Analytical Sciences Laboratory, 1897 Building, Midland, Michigan 48667

The Dow Chemical Company, Analytical Sciences Laboratory, 1897 Building, Midland, Michigan 48667===Search for more papers by this author
Walter C. Buzanowski

Walter C. Buzanowski

The Dow Chemical Company, Analytical Sciences Laboratory, 1897 Building, Midland, Michigan 48667

Search for more papers by this author
Judy J. Gunderson

Judy J. Gunderson

The Dow Chemical Company, Analytical Sciences Laboratory, 1897 Building, Midland, Michigan 48667

Search for more papers by this author
Duane B. Priddy

Duane B. Priddy

The Dow Chemical Company, Analytical Sciences Laboratory, 1897 Building, Midland, Michigan 48667

Search for more papers by this author
Lance Pfenninger

Lance Pfenninger

The Dow Chemical Company, Analytical Sciences Laboratory, 1897 Building, Midland, Michigan 48667

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 September 2001
Citations: 1

Abstract

The phase partitioning of additives in polymer blends has a large impact on the performance of the blend. Therefore, it is necessary to be able to quantify the level of the additives in each phase. A 1H–NMR method is presented to determine the partitioning of additives between the rubber and rigid phases of a high-impact polystyrene (HIPS) material. In one case, a HIPS material was modified with 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-methyl-phenol (Ionol, CAS# 128-37-OMF) as a stabilizer for both phases. HIPS materials with varying levels of Ionol were melt-blended by extrusion and the total level of additives was determined analytically for these standard materials. The 1H–NMR method was used to determine the level of Ionol in the poly(butadiene) rubber phase. The Ionol was found to preferentially partition into the rubber phase with a partition coefficient of about 2. A second example of the same concept, instead utilizing 13C–NMR, involved the analysis of the partition coefficient for both Tinuvin P and Tinuvin 770 (CAS# 2440-22-4 and 52829-07-9), partitioning between the rigid and rubber phases of an ethylene–propylene–diene-modified (EPDM) toughened styrene–ran–acrylonitrile (SAN) copolymer. The partition coefficient was determined to be 0.5 for Tinuvin P and 1.3 for Tinuvin 770. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 82: 1963–1970, 2001

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.