Volume 8, Issue 7 pp. 825-830
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Computed tomography analysis of frontal cell prevalence according to the International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification

Garret Choby MD

Garret Choby MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Department of Otorhinolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew Thamboo MD

Andrew Thamboo MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, University of British Columbia School of Medicine, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Tae-Bin Won MD, PhD

Tae-Bin Won MD, PhD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Jooyeon Kim MD

Jooyeon Kim MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Liang Chun Shih MD

Liang Chun Shih MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC

Search for more papers by this author
Peter H. Hwang MD

Corresponding Author

Peter H. Hwang MD

Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA

Correspondence to: Garret W. Choby, M.D., Mayo Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Rhinology and Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery, 200 First St. SW, Rochester, MN 55905, Phone: 507-284-3542, Option 2, Fax: 507-284-8855, Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 February 2018
Citations: 32

Potential conflicts of interest: P.H.H., consultant for Olympus, 480 Biomedical, Bioinspire, Arrinex, and Sinuwave.

View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com.

Abstract

Background

The International Frontal Sinus Anatomy Classification (IFAC) is an international consensus document published in 2016 to standardize the nomenclature of cells in the region of the frontal recess and frontal sinus. The IFAC was designed to be surgically relevant and anatomically precise. The current study was undertaken to assess the prevalence of the frontal cell variants as defined by the IFAC, as well as to determine the interrater reliability of the IFAC.

Methods

Three independent reviewers examined triplanar nondiseased maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) scans to assess the anatomy of the frontal recess according to the IFAC system. The prevalence of each cell type was assessed and interrater reliability was measured using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results

One hundred CT scans (200 sides) were examined. Of the 200 sides, 96.5% contained an agger nasi cell (ICC, 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-0.86), 30.0% contained a supra agger cell (ICC, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.86-0.92), 20.0% contained a supra agger frontal cell (ICC 0.80; 95% CI 0.74-0.84), 72.0% contained a supra bulla cell (ICC, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76-0.85), 5.5% contained a supra bulla frontal cell (ICC, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.63-0.77), 28.5% contained a supraorbital ethmoid cell (ICC, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.83), and 30.0% contained a frontal septal cell (ICC, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.74-0.84). The ICC was good to excellent for identification of all frontal cell types.

Conclusions

This study describes the normative distribution of frontal recess cells in a nondiseased population according to IFAC and demonstrates favorable interrater reliability of the classification system.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.