Volume 5, Issue 10 pp. 877-883
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Paired analysis of the microbiota of surface mucus and whole-tissue specimens in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis

Raymond J.T. Kim MBChB

Raymond J.T. Kim MBChB

Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
Kristi Biswas PhD

Kristi Biswas PhD

Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Hoggard BSc (Hons)

Michael Hoggard BSc (Hons)

School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
Michael W. Taylor PhD

Michael W. Taylor PhD

School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Search for more papers by this author
Richard G. Douglas MD, FRACS

Corresponding Author

Richard G. Douglas MD, FRACS

Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

Correspondence to: Richard G. Douglas, MD, FRACS, Department of Surgery, Level 12, Auckland City Hospital, Park Road, Grafton, Auckland 1023, New Zealand; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 July 2015
Citations: 30

Funding sources for the study: Green Lane Research and Educational Fund Board.

Potential conflict of interest: None provided.

Abstract

Background

The role of bacteria in the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) remains uncertain. Recent evidence suggests that bacteria are able to establish microcolonies within the underlying mucosa. However, to date there has been no systematic comparison of bacterial community composition and diversity in the surface mucosa with that of the underlying tissue.

Methods

Paired swabs and whole-tissue samples were collected from the middle meatus of 9 patients with CRS undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery. The bacterial composition and diversity of the samples were determined using 16S rRNA gene amplicon pyrosequencing.

Results

The bacterial communities of both swabs and tissues were dominated by known residents of the sinonasal cavity such as Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Prevotella, and Peptoniphilus. Although bacterial diversity (richness) did not differ between the 2 groups of samples, there were significant differences in the composition of bacterial communities. Molecular analyses revealed a large amount of interpersonal variation between patients.

Conclusion

Swab and tissue samples revealed similar bacterial diversity to each other and to that of other microbiota studies reported in the CRS literature. However, bacterial composition was significantly different between the 2 sample types, even though the tissue biopsies also comprise bacteria from the surface. We speculate that the bacteria on the surface seed the underlying tissue via the damaged epithelium in CRS patients, which over time develops into a distinct bacterial community.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.