On the relationship of dental microwear to dental macrowear
Corresponding Author
Christopher W. Schmidt
Department of Anthropology, University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46227
Indiana Prehistory Laboratory, University of Indianapolis, 1400 E. Hanna Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46227, USASearch for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Christopher W. Schmidt
Department of Anthropology, University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN 46227
Indiana Prehistory Laboratory, University of Indianapolis, 1400 E. Hanna Avenue, Indianapolis, Indiana 46227, USASearch for more papers by this authorAbstract
Dental microwear analysts have demonstrated that hard diets leave numerous microscopic pits on occlusal surfaces. The relationship between occlusal pitting and gross macrowear, however, is not well known. The current study seeks to elucidate the relationship between dental microwear and macrowear by determining if microscopically pitted teeth are associated with greater expressions of macrowear. This study examined microwear and macrowear on mandibular second molars from 60 prehistoric adult Native Americans representing three dietary regimes (foraging, mixed economy, and agriculture). Initially, two dental microwear feature variables were studied: percentage of pits and mean scratch width. Standard macrowear scores ranged from 4 to 40. ANOVAs suggested that neither of the microwear variables was affected by age or sex, but age affected macrowear scores. Because of this, the sample had a balanced number of young and old adults (i.e., those below and above skeletal age 35). A Pearson's correlation showed no covariation between scratch width and the percentage of pits. Regression analysis indicated that macrowear was not a function of the percentage of pits. However, a significant positive relationship was found between dental macrowear and scratch width. A post priori test found a significant negative relationship between macrowear and the total number of scratches. It is concluded, then, that wide scratches remove more enamel and dentin than do numerous pits, although both cause dental wear. It is suggested here that the term “abrasive” be used to describe those microwear profiles that lead to heavy macrowear and have relatively wide scratches. Am J Phys Anthropol, 2010. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
LITERATURE CITED
- Agresti J. 1991. Categorical data analyis. New York: Wiley.
- Buikstra JE,Ubelaker DH. 1994. Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Arkansas Archaeological Survey, Research Series No. 44.
- Bullington J. 1991. Deciduous dental microwear of prehistoric juveniles from the lower Illinois River Valley. Am J Phys Anthropol 84: 59–73.
- Butler PM. 1952. The milk molars of Perissodactyla, with remarks on molar occlusion. Proc Zool Soc Lond 121: 777–817.
-
Fortelius M,Solounias N.
2000.
Functional characterization of ungulate molars using the abrasion-attrition wear gradient: a new method for reconstructing paleodiets.
Am Mus Novit
3301:
1–36.
10.1206/0003-0082(2000)301<0001:FCOUMU>2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar
- Gordon KD. 1982. A study of microwear on chimpanzee molars: implications for dental microwear analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol 59: 195–215.
- Gügel IL,Grupe G,Kunzelmann KH. 2001. Simulation of dental microwear: characteristic traces by opan phytoliths give clues to ancient human dietary behavior. Am J Phys Anthropol 114: 139–145.
- Harmon AM,Rose JC. 1988. The role of dental microwear analysis in the reconstruction of prehistoric diet. In: BV Kennedy, GM LeMoine, editors. Diet and subsistence: current archaeological perspectives. Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference of the Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary. p 267–272.
- Hiiamae KM,Crompton AM. 1985. Mastication, food transport, and swallowing. In: M Hildebrand, DM Bramble, KF Liem, editors. Functional vertebrate morphology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p 262–290.
- Kaiser TM,Fortelius M. 2003. Differential mesowear in occluding upper and lower molars: opening mesowear analysis for lower molars and premolars in hypsodont horses. J Morphol 258: 67–83.
- Maas MC. 1994. A scanning electron-microscopic study of in vitro abrasion of mammalian tooth enamel under compressive loads. Arch Oral Biol 39: 1–11.
- Mahoney P. 2006. Dental microwear from Natufian hunter-gatherers and early Neolithic farmers: comparisons within and between samples. Am J Phys Anthropol 130: 308–319.
- Mahoney P. 2007. Human dental microwear from Ohalo II (22,500-23,500 cal BP), southern Levant. Am J Phys Anthropol 132: 489–500.
- Maier W,Schneck G. 1982. Functional morphology of hominoid dentitions. J Hum Evol 11: 693–696.
- Noble VE,Teaford MF. 1995. Dental microwear in Caucasian, American Homo sapiens: preliminary results. Am J Phys Anthropol Suppl 20: 162.
- Nystrom P,Phillips-Conroy JE,Jolly CJ. 2004. Dental microwear in Anubis hybrid baboons (Papio hamadryas, Sensu Lato) living in Awash National Park, Ethiopia. Am J Phys Anthropol 125: 279–291.
- Organ JM,Teaford MF,Larsen CS. 2005. Dietary inferences from dental occlusal microwear at Mission San Luis de Apalachee. Am J Phys Anthropol 128: 801–811.
- Pastor RF. 1993. Dental microwear among prehistoric inhabitants of the Indian subcontinent: a quantitative and comparative analysis. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon.
- Polo-Cerdá M,Romero A,Casabó J,De Juan J. 2007. The Bronze Age burials from Cova Dels Blaus (Vall d'Uixó, Castelló, Spain): an approach to palaeodietary reconstruction through dental pathology, occlusal wear and buccal microwear patterns. Homo 58: 297–307.
- Ryan AS. 1979. Wear striation direction on primate teeth: a scanning electron microscope examination. Am J Phys Anthropol 50: 155–167.
- Sanson GD,Kerr SA,Gross KA. 2007. Do silica phytoliths really wear mammalian teeth? J Archaeol Sci 34: 526–531.
- Schmidt CW. 1998. Dietary reconstruction among prehistoric humans from Indiana: an analysis of Dental Macrowear, Dental Pathology, and Dental Microwear. Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana.
- Schmidt CW. 1999. Methods for casting ancient bone and teeth for viewing under the SEM. Micros Today 7: 14–15.
- Schmidt CW. 2001. Dental microwear evidence for a dietary shift between two nonmaize-reliant prehistoric human populations from Indiana. Am J Phys Anthropol 114: 139–145.
- Schmidt CW. 2004. Woodland to Mississippian dietary transitions in Indiana as indicated by dental microwear analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol Suppl 38: 174.
- Schmidt CW,Greene TR. 2003. Dental evidence for maize consumption during the Albee Phase in Indiana. In: BG Richmond, JR Jones, editors. Facing the final millenium: studies in the Late Prehistory of Indiana, A.D. 700 to 1700. Indianapolis: Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology. p 61–84.
- Schmidt CW,Williamson MA. 1998. Paleopathology at the Late Woodland Albee Phase, Commissary Site (12Hn2): implications for sedentism and maize consumption. Indiana Archaeol 2: 43–69.
- Scott EC. 1979. Dental scoring technique. Am J Phys Anthropol 51: 213–218.
- Scott RS,Ungar PS,Bergstrom TS,Brown CA,Childs BE,Teaford MF,Walker A. 2006. Dental microwear texture analysis: technical considerations. J Hum Evol 51: 339–349.
- Scott RS,Ungar PS,Bergstrom TS,Brown CA,Grine FE,Teaford MF,Walker A. 2005. Dental microwear texture analysis shows within species diet variability in fossil hominins. Nature 436: 693–695.
- Smith BH. 1984. Patterns of molar wear in hunter-gatherers and agriculturalists. Am J Phys Anthropol 62: 39–56.
- Sokal RR,Rohlf FJ. 1990. Biometry. New York: WH Freeman and Co.
- Solounias N,Semprebon G. 2002. Advances in the reconstruction of ungulate ecomorphology with application to early fossil equids. Am Mus Novit 3366: 1–49.
- Strait SG. 1993. Molar microwear in extant small-bodied faunivorous mammals: an analysis of feature density and pit frequency. Am J Phys Anthropol 92: 63–79.
- Teaford MF. 1988. A review of dental microwear and diet in modern mammals. Scan Microsc 2: 1149–1166.
- Teaford MF. 1991. Dental microwear: what can it tell us about diet and dental function? In: MA Kelley, CS Larsen, editors. Advances in dental anthropology. New York: Wiley-Liss. p 341–356.
- Teaford MF. 1993. Dental microwear and diet in extant and extinct Theropithecus: preliminary analyses. In: NG Jablonski, editor. Theropithecus: the life and death of a primate genus. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p 331–349.
- Teaford MF,Robinson JG. 1989. Seasonal or ecological differences in diet and molar microwear in Cebus nigrivittatus. Am J Phys Anthropol 80: 391–401.
- Teaford MF,Runestad JA. 1992. Dental microwear and diet in Venezuelan primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 88: 347–364.
- Teaford MF,Walker A. 1984. Quantitative differences in dental microwear between primate species with different diets and a comment on the presumed diet of Sivapithecus. Am J Phys Anthropol 64: 191–200.
- Ungar PS. 1994. Incisor microwear of Sumatran anthropoid primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 94: 339–363.
- Ungar PS. 1995. A semiautomated image analysis procedure for the quantification of dental microwear II. Scanning 17: 57–59.
- Ungar PS,Teaford MF,Glander KE,Pastor RF. 1995. Dust accumulation in the canopy: a potential cause of dental microwear in primates. Am J Phys Anthropol 97: 93–99.
-
Van Valkenburgh B,Teaford MF,Walker A.
1990.
Molar microwear and diet in large carnivores.
J Zool
22:
319–340.
10.1111/j.1469-7998.1990.tb05680.x Google Scholar
- Walker A,Hoeck HN,Perez L. 1978. Microwear of mammalian teeth as an indicator of diet. Science 201: 908–910.
- Young WG,Brennan KP,Marshall RI. 1990. Occlusal movements of the brushtail opossum, Trichosurus vulpecula, from microwear on the teeth. Aust J Zool 38: 41–51.
- Young WG,Marty TM. 1986. Wear and microwear on the teeth of a moose (Alces alces) population in Manitoba, Canada. Can J Zool 64: 2467–2479.