Foot morphology and evolution in early Eocene Cantius
Daniel L. Gebo
Department of Anthropology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115
Search for more papers by this authorMarian Dagosto
Department of Cell, Molecular and Structural Biology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611
Search for more papers by this authorKenneth D. Rose
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, The Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
Search for more papers by this authorDaniel L. Gebo
Department of Anthropology, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, Illinois 60115
Search for more papers by this authorMarian Dagosto
Department of Cell, Molecular and Structural Biology, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611
Search for more papers by this authorKenneth D. Rose
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, The Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
More than one hundred undescribed foot elements of Cantius and other closely related notharctine adapids (7 species in all) from throughout the early Eocene (Wasatchian) Willwood Formation of the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming, have been analyzed. For four species (Cantius ralstoni, “Copelemur” feretutus, Cantius frugivorus, and? Pelycodus jarrovii) these represent the first described postcranial material. The clade of Cantius and allied genera in the Bighorn Basin includes several speciation events and both increases and decreases in body size. The largest species represented by tarsal remains (? Pelycodus jarrovii) is several times larger than the smallest, Cantius ralstoni. However, despite the number of species, temporal duration, and range of body size represented, there are no obvious changes in foot morphology as measured by various indices or by observation of qualitative features. This contrasts with the more obvious changes in dental features (e.g., development of hypocone and mesostyle) in the same group of species described by earlier authors. The fossil record of Cantius thus illustrates different kinds of evolutionary change in the dentition and tarsus. The dentition changes in both size and shape while the tarsus changes only in size. We describe significant differences in foot anatomy which distinguish notharctines from extant strepsirhines, including the nature of the articulations between the navicular and cuboid and the distal tarsus with the metatarsus. These features indicate that the fossil taxa are not particularly closely allied phylogenetically to either extant strepsirhines in general or lemurids in particular.
Literature Cited
- Beard KC (1988) New notharctine primate fossils from the early Eocene of New Mexico and southern Wyoming and the phylogeny of Nothartinae. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 75: 439–469.
- Beard KC, Dagosto M, Gebo DL, and Godinot M (1988) Interrelationships among primate higher taxa: New evidence from postcranial fossils. Nature 331: 712–714.
-
Bown TM, and
Beard KC
(1990)
Systematic lateral variation in the distribution of fossil mammals in alluvial paleosols, lower Eocene Willwood Formation, Wyoming.
Geological Society of America, Special Paper
243:
135–151.
10.1130/SPE243-p135 Google Scholar
- Bown TM, and Rose KD (1987) Patterns of dental evolution in early Eocene anaptomorphine primates (Omomyidae) from the Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. Paleontological Society Memoir 23, J. Paleont. 61 (suppl. to no. 5): 1–162.
- Bown TM, Rose KD, Simons EL, and Wing SL (in press) Distribution and stratigraphic correlation of fossil mammal and plant localities of the Fort Union, Willwood, and Tatman Formations (Upper Paleocene–Lower Eocene), Central and Southern Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. Bull. U.S. Geol. Surv.
- Conroy GC, and Rose MD (1983) The evolution of the primate foot from the earliest primates to the Miocene. Foot and Ankle 3: 342–364.
- Covert HH (1985) Adaptations and Evolutionary Relationships of the Eocene Primate Family Notharctidae. Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.
- Covert HH (1986) Biology of early Cenozoic Primates. In DR Swindler and J Erwin (eds.): Comparative Primate Biology, Volume 1: Systematics, Evolution, and Anatomy. New York: Alan R. Liss, pp. 335–359.
- Covert HH (1988) Ankle and foot morphology of Cantius mckennai: adaptations and phylogenetic implications. J. Hum. Evol. 17: 57–70.
- Covert HH (1990) Phylogenetic relationships among the Notharctinae of North America. Am. J. Phys, Anthropol. 81: 381–397.
- Dagosto M (1983) Postcranium of Adapis parisiensis and Leptadapis magnus (Adapiformes, Primates). Folia Primatol. 41: 49–101.
- Dagosto M (1986) The Joints of the Tarsus in the Strepsirhine Primates: Functional, Adaptive, and Evolutionary Implications. Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York.
- Dagosto M (1988) Implications of postcranial evidence for the origin of euprimates. J. Hum. Evol. 17: 35–56.
-
Decker RL, and
Szalay FS
(1974)
Origin and function of the pes in the Eocene Adapidae (Lemuriformes, Primates).
In FA Jenkins (ed):
Primate Locomotion.
New York, Academic Press,
pp. 261–291.
10.1016/B978-0-12-384050-9.50014-3 Google Scholar
- Gazin CL (1958) A review of the middle and upper Eocene primates of North America. Smithsonian Misc. Coll. 136: 1–112.
- Gebo DL (1985) The nature of the primate grasping foot. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol 67: 269–277.
- Gebo DL (1986) The Anatomy of the Prosimian Foot and Its Application to the Primate Fossil Record. Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University.
- Gebo DL (1987) Humeral morphology of Cantius, an early Eocene adapid. Folia Primatol. 49: 52–56.
- Gebo DL (1988) Foot morphology and locomotor adaptation in Eocene primates. Folia Primatol. 50: 3–41.
- Gebo DL, and Dagosto M (1988) Foot morphology, climbing, and the evolution of the Indriidae. J. Hum. Evol. 17: 135–154.
- Gingerich PD (1974) Stratigraphic record of early Eocene Hyopsodus and the geometry of mammalian phylogeny. Nature 248: 107–109.
- Gingerich PD (1979) Phylogeny of middle Eocene Adapidae (Mammalia, Primates) in North America: Smilodectes and Notharctus. J. Paleont. 53: 153–163.
- Gingerich PD (1980) Evolutionary patterns in early Cenozoic Mammals. Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 8: 407–424.
- Gingerich PD (1982) Time resolution in mammalian evolution: Sampling, lineages, and faunal turnover. Proc. Third N. Am. Paleont. Conv. 1: 205–210.
- Gingerich PD (1989) New earliest Wasatchian mammalian fauna from the Eocene of northwestern Wyoming: Composition and diversity in a rarely sampled high-floodplain assemblage. Univ. of Michigan Papers on Paleont. 28: 1–97.
- Gingerich PD, and Deutsch HA (1989) Systematics and evolution of early Eocene Hyaenodontidae (Mammalia, Credonta) in the Clarks Fork Basin, Wyoming. Contrib. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich. 27: 327–391.
- Gingerich PD, and Haskin RA (1981) Dentition of early Eocene Pelycodus jarrovii (Mammalia, Primates) and the generic attribution of species formerly referred to Pelycodus. Contrib. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich. 25: 327–337
- Gingerich PD, and Simons EL (1977) Systematics, phylogeny, and evolution of early Eocene Adapidae (Mamalia, Primates) in North America. Contrib. Mus. Paleont. Univ. Mich. 24: 245–279.
- Gregory WK (1915) I. On the relationships of the Eocene lemur Notharctus to the Adapidae and to other primates. II. On the classification and phylogeny of the Lemuroidea. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am. 26: 419–446.
- Gregory WK (1920) On the structure and relations of Notharctus, an American Eocene primate. Mem. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 3: 51–243.
- Gregory WK (1937) Supra-specific variation in nature and in classification. Am. Nat. 71: 268–276.
- Gunnell GF (1989) Evolutionary history of Microsyopoidea (Mammalia, ?Primates) and the relationship between Plesiadapiformes and primates. Univ. of Michigan Papers on Paleont. 27: 1–157.
- Lewis OJ (1980) The joints of the evolving foot. Part III: The fossil evidence. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 46: 169–188.
- Matthew WD (1915) A revision of the lower Eocene Wasatch and Wind River faunas. Part IV: Entelonychia, Primates, Insectivora. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 34: 429–483.
- Morton DJ (1924) Evolution of the human foot, part II. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol 7: 1–52.
- Osborn HF (1902) American Eocene primates and the supposed rodent family Mixodectidae. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 16: 169–214.
- Rose KD (1990) Postcranial skeletal remains and adaptation in early Eocene mammals from the Willwood Formation, Bighorn Basin, Wyoming. In TM Bown and KD Rose (eds): Dawn of the Age of Mammals in the Northern Part of the Rocky Mountain Interior, North America. Denver: Geol. Soc. Amer. Spec. Pap. 243, pp. 107–133.
- Rose KD, and Bown TM (1984a) Gradual phyletic evolution at the generic level of early Eocene omomyid primates. Nature 309: 250–252.
- Rose KD, and Bown TM (1984b) Early Eocene Pelycodus jarrovii (Primates:Adapidae) from Wyoming: Phylogenetic and biostratigraphic implications. J. Paleont. 58: 1532–1535.
- Rose KD, and Walker A (1985) The skeleton of early Eocene Cantius, oldest lemuriform primate. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 66: 73–89.
- Schwartz JH (1986) Primate systematics and a classification of the order. In DR Swindler and J Erwin (eds.): Comparative Primate Biology, Vol 1. New York: Alan R. Liss, pp. 1–41.
- Schwartz JH, and Tattersall I (1979) The phylogenetic relationships of Adapidae (Primates, Lemuriformes). Anth. Pap. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 55: 271–283.
- Schwartz JH, and Tattersall I (1987) Tarsiers, adapids and the integrity of Strepsirhini. J. Hum. Evol. 16: 23–40.
- Simpson GG (1940) Studies on the earliest primates. Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 77: 185–212.
- Szalay FS, and Dagosto M (1988) Evolution of hallucial grasping in the primates. J. Hum. Evol. 17: 1–34.
- Szalay FS, and Delson E (1979) Evolutionary History of the Primates. New York: Academic Press.
- Tattersall I (1982) The Primates of Madagascar. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Terranova CJ, and Dagosto M (1990) Body weight prediction in Eocene prosimians. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 81: 307 (Abstract).
