Volume 39, Issue 6 pp. 587-597
Article

Subclinical immunologic and physiologic responses in hexamethylene diisocyanate-exposed auto body shop workers

Carrie A. Redlich MD, MPH

Corresponding Author

Carrie A. Redlich MD, MPH

Yale Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

YOEMP, 135 College St, New Haven, CT 06511.Search for more papers by this author
Meredith H. Stowe PhD

Meredith H. Stowe PhD

Yale Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Search for more papers by this author
Adam V. Wisnewski PhD

Adam V. Wisnewski PhD

Yale Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Search for more papers by this author
Ellen A. Eisen ScD

Ellen A. Eisen ScD

Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts—Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
Meryl H. Karol PhD

Meryl H. Karol PhD

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Center for Environmental and Occupational Health and Toxicology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Ranulfo Lemus PhD

Ranulfo Lemus PhD

Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Center for Environmental and Occupational Health and Toxicology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Search for more papers by this author
Carole T. Holm RN

Carole T. Holm RN

Yale Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Search for more papers by this author
Joyce S. Chung MPH

Joyce S. Chung MPH

Yale Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Search for more papers by this author
Judy Sparer CIH, MSCE

Judy Sparer CIH, MSCE

Yale Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Search for more papers by this author
Youcheng Liu ScD

Youcheng Liu ScD

Yale Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Search for more papers by this author
Susan R. Woskie PhD

Susan R. Woskie PhD

Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts—Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
James Appiah-Pippim MD, MPH

James Appiah-Pippim MD, MPH

Yale Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Search for more papers by this author
Rebecca Gore PhD

Rebecca Gore PhD

Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts—Lowell, Lowell, Massachusetts

Search for more papers by this author
Mark R. Cullen MD

Mark R. Cullen MD

Yale Occupational and Environmental Medicine Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 May 2001
Citations: 48

Abstract

Background

Diisocyanates are potent sensitizing agents and currently the most commonly identified cause of occupational asthma in industrialized countries. However, diisocyanate asthma is difficult to diagnose and exposure and host risk factors are unclear. Auto body shops, one of the most common hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) exposure settings, are particularly difficult to study due to their small size and episodic exposures. Surveillance studies of such workers are limited.

Objectives

We have initiated a cross-sectional field epidemiologic study, Survey of Painters and Repairers of Auto bodies by Yale (SPRAY), to characterize the effects of diisocyanate exposures on actively employed auto body shop workers.

Methods and Results

We present here questionnaire, physiologic, immunologic, and exposure data on 75 subjects enrolled in the study. No overt cases of clinically apparent diisocyanate asthma were identified based on spirometry, methacholine challenge, peak flows, and symptoms. HDI-specific lymphocyte proliferation was present in 30% of HDI-exposed workers and HDI-specific IgG in 34% of HDI-exposed workers, but they were not associated. HDI-specific IgE was detected in two workers. HDI-specific lymphocyte proliferation, increased methacholine responsiveness, and symptoms of chest tightness and shortness of breath were more common in the most heavily HDI-exposed workers, the painters. More long-term follow-up of this cohort should clarify the significance of these HDI-specific immunologic responses, physiologic changes, and symptoms.

Conclusions

These findings demonstrate the presence of HDI-specific immune responses in a large proportion of healthy HDI-exposed workers. Am. J. Ind. Med. 39:587–597, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.