Volume 43, Issue 2 pp. 132-141
Article

Excess of symptoms among radiographers

Helen Dimich-Ward PhD

Corresponding Author

Helen Dimich-Ward PhD

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia

Respiratory Division, UBC Dept. Medicine, VGH Research Pavilion, 716-828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC Canada, V5Z IL8.Search for more papers by this author
Michelle Wymer BSc

Michelle Wymer BSc

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia

Search for more papers by this author
Susan Kennedy PhD

Susan Kennedy PhD

Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia

Search for more papers by this author
Kay Teschke PhD

Kay Teschke PhD

Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, British Columbia

Search for more papers by this author
Roxanne Rousseau BSc

Roxanne Rousseau BSc

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia

Search for more papers by this author
Moira Chan-Yeung MB, FRCPC

Moira Chan-Yeung MB, FRCPC

Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, British Columbia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 January 2003
Citations: 10

Institution where work was performed at UBC Department of Medicine.

Abstract

Background

The prevalence and occupational determinants of miscellaneous symptoms referred to as “Darkroom disease” was compared between radiographers and physiotherapists working in British Columbia, Canada.

Methods

The participation rate for the mailout questionnaire survey was 66.1%. A small subset underwent spirometry and methacholine challenge testing.

Results

Radiographers had a higher prevalence of most symptoms, with an extreme odds ratio of 11.4 for chemical/metallic taste. The percentage of radiographers with non-specific bronchial hyperresponsiveness (NSBHR) was 3 times higher than that of physiotherapists, although the comparison was not statistically significant. Reporting inadequate ventilation, frequently detecting the odor of X-ray processing chemicals and cleaning up spills within the past 12 months were highly associated with most of the symptoms.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that differences in the prevalence of symptoms represent a complex process, both in exposure and response to the many constituents found in radiographic processing chemicals. Objective testing of health outcomes and more refined exposure measurements are recommended to further investigate occupational health problems of radiographers. Am. J. Ind. Med. 43: 132–141, 2003. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.