RESEARCH ARTICLE
Adaptive attitude control for spacecraft systems with sensor and actuator attacks
Haibin Sun,
Linlin Hou,
Corresponding Author
Haibin Sun
School of Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, China
Correspondence Haibin Sun, School of Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorLinlin Hou
School of Computer, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, China
Search for more papers by this authorHaibin Sun,
Linlin Hou,
Corresponding Author
Haibin Sun
School of Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, China
Correspondence Haibin Sun, School of Engineering, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao 276826, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorLinlin Hou
School of Computer, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, China
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
This paper is addressed with the attitude stabilization problem for spacecraft systems with external disturbances in physical layer and sensor and actuator attacks (SAAs) in cyber layer. Some state-dependent attacks are implanted in system measurement data channels and control input commands. Two stable adaptive backstepping controllers are constructed for two different assumption conditions with sensor attack, in which a compensation term in each controller is included to eliminate the effects of SAAs and recover the ideal system performance. Under the proposed control schemes, the system states can asymptotically converge to zero even if SAAs and external disturbances are co-existing. The validity of the developed scheme is demonstrated via a simulation example.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
REFERENCES
- 1Du HB, Li SH. Finite-time attitude stabilization for a spacecraft using homogeneous method. J Guid Control Dyn. 2012; 35(3): 740-748.
- 2Xiao B, Yin S, Kaynak O. Tracking control of robotic manipulators with uncertain kinematics and dynamics. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2016; 63(10): 6439-6449.
- 3Yin S, Xiao B, Ding SX, Zhou DH. A review on recent development of spacecraft attitude fault tolerant control system. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2016; 63(5): 3311-3320.
- 4Zhu Z, Guo Y. Adaptive fault-tolerant attitude tracking control for spacecraft formation with unknown inertia. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process. 2018; 32(1): 13-26.
- 5Shao X, Hu Q, Shi Y, Jiang B. Fault-tolerant prescribed performance attitude tracking control for spacecraft under input saturation. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2020; 28(2): 574-582.
- 6Zou AM, Kumar KD. Adaptive attitude control of spacecraft without velocity measurements using chebyshev neural network. Acta Astronaut. 2010; 66(5): 769-779.
- 7Yoon H, Agrawal BN. Adaptive control of uncertain hamiltonian multi-input multi-output systems: with application to spacecraft control. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2009; 17(4): 900-906.
- 8 Qiao J, Wu H, Yu X. High-precision attitude tracking control of space manipulator system under multiple disturbances. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst. 2021; 51(7): 4274-4284.
- 9Liu ZJ, Liu JK, Wang LJ. Disturbance observer based attitude control for flexible spacecraft with input magnitude and rate constraints. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2018; 72: 486-492.
- 10 Qiao J, Li Z, Xu J, Yu X. Composite nonsingular terminal sliding mode attitude controller for spacecraft with actuator dynamics under matched and mismatched disturbances. IEEE Trans Ind Inform. 2020; 16(2): 1153-1162.
- 11Hou L, Sun H. Anti-disturbance attitude control of flexible spacecraft with quantized states. Aerosp Sci Technol. 2020; 99:105760.
- 12Li B, Hu Q, Yang Y, Postolache OA. Finite-time disturbance observer based integral sliding mode control for attitude stabilisation under actuator failure. IET Control Theory Appl. 2019; 13(1): 50-58.
- 13Singh SN, Iyer A. Nonlinear decoupling sliding mode control and attitude control of spacecraft. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 1989; 25(5): 621-633.
- 14Zhu Z, Xia YQ, Fu MY. Adaptive sliding mode control for attitude stabilization with actuator saturation. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2011; 58(10): 4898-4907.
- 15Jiang BY, Hu QL, Friswell MI. Fixed-time attitude control for rigid spacecraft with actuator saturation and faults. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol. 2016; 24(5): 1892-1898.
- 16Jiang BY. Fixed-time rendezvous control of spacecraft with a tumbling target under loss of actuator effectiveness. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 2016; 52(4): 1576-1586.
- 17Li SH, Ding SH, Li Q. Global set stabilisation of the spacecraft attitude using finite-time control technique. Int J Control. 2009; 82(5): 822-836.
- 18Global set stabilization of the spacecraft attitude control problem based on quaternion. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control. 2010; 20(1): 84-105.
- 19Lu KF, Xia YQ, Yu CM, Liu HL. Finite-time tracking control of rigid spacecraft under actuator saturations and faults. IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng. 2016; 13(1): 368-381.
- 20Wang Z, Su Y, Zhang L. Fixed-time attitude tracking control for rigid spacecraft. IET Control Theory Appl. 2020; 14(5): 790-799.
- 21Sun HB, Hou LL, Zong GD, Yu XH. Fixed-time attitude tracking control for spacecraft with input quantization. IEEE Trans Aerosp Electron Syst. 2019; 55(1): 124-134.
- 22Krstic M, Kanellakopoulos I, Kokotovic P. Nonlinear and Adaptive Control Design. Wiley; 1995.
- 23Wang CL, Guo L, Wen CY, Hu QL, Qiao JZ. Event-triggered adaptive attitude tracking control for spacecraft with unknown actuator faults. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2020; 67(3): 2241-2250.
- 24Du HB, Li SH. Attitude synchronization control for a group of flexible spacecraft. Automatica. 2014; 50(2): 646-651.
- 25Kim YV. Satellite control system, part i-architecture and manin components. Satellite System-Design, Modeling Simulation and Analysis. IntechOpen; 2020.
- 26 G. Falco, When Satellites Attack: Satellite-to-Satellite Cyber Attack, Defense and Resilience. ASCEND; 2020.
- 27Zhu M, Martĺnez S. On the performance analysis of resilient networked control systems under replay attacks. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2014; 59(3): 804-808.
- 28Hu L, Wang Z, Han Q-L, Liu X. State estimation under false data injection attacks: security analysis and system protection. Automatica. 2018; 87: 176-183.
- 29Lu A, Yang G. Input-to-state stabilizing control for cyber-physical systems with multiple transmission channels under denial of service. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2018; 63(6): 1813-1820.
- 30Jin X, Haddad WM, Yucelen T. An adaptive control architecture for mitigating sensor and actuator attacks in cyber-physical systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2017; 62(11): 6058-6064.
- 31Ye D, Luo SP. A co-design methodology for cyber-physical systems under actuator fault and cyber attack. J Franklin Inst. 2019; 356(4): 1856-1879.
- 32Wertz JR. Spacecraft Attitude Determination and Control. Reidel; 1978.
10.1007/978-94-009-9907-7 Google Scholar
- 33Teixeira A, Shames I, Sandberg H, et al. A secure control framework for resource-limited adversaries. Automatica. 2015; 51: 135-148.
- 34Mo YL, Sinopoli B. On the performance degradation of cyber-physical systems under stealthy integrity attacks. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2016; 61(9): 2618-2624.
- 35Dong JX, Yang GH. Reliable state feedback control of T-S fuzzy systems with sensor faults. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst. 2015; 23(2): 421-433.
- 36Reppa V, Polycarpou MM, Panayiotou CG. Decentralized isolation of multiple sensor faults in large-scale interconnected nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2015; 60(6): 1582-1596.
- 37Yu XH, Wang T, Gao HJ. Adaptive neural fault-tolerant control for a class of strict-feedback nonlinear systems with actuator and sensor faults. Neurocomputing. 2020; 380: 87-94.
- 38Jin X. Adaptive fault tolerant control for a class of multi-input multi-output nonlinear systems with both sensor and actuator faults. Int J Adapt Control Signal Process. 2017; 31(10): 1418-1427.
- 39Cai Z, de Queiroz MS, Dawson DM. A sufficiently smooth projection operator. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 2006; 51(1): 135-139.
- 40Huang J, Song Y, Wang W, Wen C, Li G. Fully distributed adaptive consensus control of a class of high-order nonlinear systems with a directed topology and unknown control directions. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2018; 48(8): 2349-2356.
- 41Polycarpou MM. Stable adaptive neural control scheme for nonlinear systems. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1996; 41(3): 447-451.
- 42Lavretsky E, Wise K. Robust and Adaptive Control: With Aerospace Applications. Springer; 2012.
- 43Slotine JJ, Li WP. Applied Nonlinear Control. Prentice-Hall; 1991.
- 44Ameli A, Hooshyar A, El-Saadany EF, Youssef AM. Attack detection and identification for automatic generation control systems. IEEE Trans Power Syst. 2018; 33(5): 4760-4774.
- 45Pazera M, Witczak M. Towards robust simultaneous actuator and sensor fault estimation for a class of nonlinear systems: design and comparison. IEEE Access. 2019; 7: 97 143-97 158.
