Research Article
Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs
Viren Swami,
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic,
Adrian Furnham,
Corresponding Author
Viren Swami
Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, UK
Department of Psychology, HELP University College, Malaysia
Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, 309 Regent Street, London W1B 2UW, UK.Search for more papers by this authorTomas Chamorro-Premuzic
Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAdrian Furnham
Department of Psychology, University College London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorViren Swami,
Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic,
Adrian Furnham,
Corresponding Author
Viren Swami
Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, UK
Department of Psychology, HELP University College, Malaysia
Department of Psychology, University of Westminster, 309 Regent Street, London W1B 2UW, UK.Search for more papers by this authorTomas Chamorro-Premuzic
Department of Psychology, Goldsmiths, University of London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAdrian Furnham
Department of Psychology, University College London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Given the widespread appeal of conspiratorial beliefs, it is surprising that very little empirical research has examined the psychological variables associated with such beliefs. In the present study, we examined individual and demographic predictors of beliefs in conspiracy theories concerning the September 11, 2001 (9/11) attacks on the World Trade Centre and Pentagon among a representative British sample of 254 women and men. Results of structural equation modelling showed that 9/11 conspiracist beliefs were positively associated with belief in other conspiracy theories, exposure to 9/11 conspiracist ideas, political cynicism, defiance of authority and the Big Five personality factor of Agreeableness. In total, a model including demographics, personality and individual difference variables explained over 50% of the variance in 9/11 conspiracist ideas. The implications of these findings for the literature on conspiracy theories are discussed. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W. G., Craig, T., & Gregory, W. L. (1999). Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology, 20, 637–647.
- Bale, J. F. (2007). Political paranoia v. political realism: On distinguishing between bogus conspiracy theories and genuine conspiratorial politics. Patterns in Prejudice, 41, 45–60.
- Bird, S. T., & Bogart, L. M. (2003). Conspiracy beliefs about HIV/AIDS and birth control among African Americans: Implications for the prevention of HIV, other STIs, and unintended pregnancy. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 109–126.
- Byford, J., & Billig, M. (2001). The emergence of antisemitic conspiracy theories in Yugoslavia during the war with NATO. Patterns of Prejudice, 35, 50–63.
- Byrne, B. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245–276.
- Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2007). Personality and individual differences. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Citrin, J., & Elkins, D. J. (1975). Political disaffection among university students: Contents, measurements and causes. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Clark, S. (2002). Conspiracy theories and conspiracy theorizing. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 32, 131–150.
- Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R., Broadnax, S., & Blaine, B. E. (1999). Belief in US government conspiracies against Blacks among Black and White college students: Powerlessness or system blame? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 941–953.
- Douglas, K. M., & Sutton, R. M. (2008). The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. The Journal of Social Psychology, 148, 210–222.
- Douglas, W. C. (1989). AIDS: The end of civilization. Clayton, MA: Valet.
- Furnham, A., McManus, I. C., & Scott, D. (2003). Personality, empathy and attitudes to animal welfare. Anthrozoös, 16, 135–146.
- Goertzel, T. (1994). Belief in conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 15, 731–742.
- Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26–34.
-
Goldberg, R. A.
(2004).
Who profited from the crime? Intelligence failure, conspiracy theories and the case of September 11.
Intelligence and National Security,
19,
249–261.
10.1080/0268452042000302985 Google Scholar
-
C. F. Graumann &
S. Moscovici (Eds.).
(1987).
Changing conceptions of conspiracy.
New York: Springer-Verlag.
10.1007/978-1-4612-4618-3 Google Scholar
- Hofstadter, R. (1965). The paranoid style in American politics and other essays. New York: Knopf.
- Hufschmid, E. (2002). Painful questions: An analysis of the September 11th attack. Laporte, CO: Ink & Scribe.
- Kaase, M. (1971). Demokratische Einstellung in der Bundesrepublik Deutscland. In R. Wildenman (Ed.), Sozialwissenschaftliches Jahrbuch für Politik (Vol. 2). Munich: Günter Olzog Verlag.
- Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher's guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
- Kline, P. (1986). A handbook of test construction. London: Methuen.
- Kramer, R. M. (1994). The sinister attribution error: Paranoid cognition and collective mistrust in organizations. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 199–230.
- Leman, P. J., & Cinnirella, M. (2007). A major event has a major cause: Evidence for the role of heuristics in reasoning about conspiracy theories. Social Psychological Review, 9, 18–28.
- Loehlin, J. C. (1987). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path, and structural analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Marrs, J. (2005). Inside job: The shocking case for a 9/11 conspiracy. San Rafael, CA: Origin.
-
Maruyama, G.
(1998).
Basics of structural equation modeling.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.4135/9781483345109 Google Scholar
- McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T. Jr., (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.
- Melley, T. (2000). Empire of conspiracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Meyssan, T. (2002). L'effroyable imposture: 11 September 2001 [The Horrifying Fraud: 11 September 2001]. Chatou: Carnot.
-
Miller, S.
(2002).
Conspiracy theories: Public arguments as coded social critiques. A rhetorical analysis of the TWA Flight 800 conspiracy theories.
Argumentation and Advocacy,
39,
40–56.
10.1080/00028533.2002.11821576 Google Scholar
- Moy, P., & Scheufele, D. A. (2000). Media effects on political and social trust. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 744–759.
- Moynihan, D. P. (1985). The paranoid style in American politics revisited. Public Interest, 81, 107–127.
- Reicher, S., & Emler, N. (1985). Delinquent behaviour and attitudes to formal authority. British Journal of Social Psychology, 24, 161–168.
- Robins, R. S., & Post, J. M. (1997). Political paranoia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Ross, M. W., Essien, E. J., & Toress, I. (2006). Conspiracy beliefs about the origin of HIV/AIDS in four racial/ethnic groups. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, 41, 342–344.
- Roznowski, M., Tucker, L. R., & Humphreys, L. G. (1991). Three approaches to determining the dimensionality of binary items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 109–127.
- Thomas, S. B., & Quinn, S. C. (1991). The Tuskegee syphilis study, 1932–1972. American Journal of Public Health, 60, 1498–1505.
- Thorburn, S., & Bogart, L. M. (2005). Conspiracy beliefs about birth control: Barriers to pregnancy prevention among African Americans of reproductive age. Health Education and Behavior, 32, 474–487.
- Ungerleider, J. T., & Wellisch, D. K. (1979). Coercive persuasion (brain-washing), religious cults, and deprogramming. American Journal of Psychiatry, 136, 279–282.
- Young, T. J. (1990). Cult violence and the identity movement. Cultic Studies Journal, 7, 150–159.
- Zonis, M., & Joseph, C. G. (1994). Conspiracy thinking in the Middle East. Political Psychology, 15, 443–459.
