Characterization of Nanomaterials
Alan F. Rawle
Malvern Instruments Inc., 117 Flanders Road, Westborough, MA01581 USA
Search for more papers by this authorAlan F. Rawle
Malvern Instruments Inc., 117 Flanders Road, Westborough, MA01581 USA
Search for more papers by this authorDr. Elisabeth Mansfield
National Inst. of Standards & TechnologyMaterials Measurement Laboratory MS 647, 325 Broadway, Boulder CO, 8305 United States
Search for more papers by this authorDr. Debra L. Kaiser
National Inst. of Standards & TechnologyMaterial Measurement Laboratory MS 8301, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg MD, 20899 United States
Search for more papers by this authorDaisuke Fujita Professor
National Inst. for Materials ScienceAdvanced Key Technologies Division, 1-2-1 Sengen, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-0047 Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMarcel Van de Voorde Professor
TU DelftFakulteit Technical Natuurwetenschappen, Eeuwige Laan 33, CL Bergen, 1861 Netherlands
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In a nutshell, the issues of nanomaterial characterization revolve around dealing with the difficulty of measuring what one cannot see. Nanomaterials have unique properties on account of their high surface area to mass ratio and their small size. Thus, a wide range of available and state-of-the-art techniques are needed to characterize such materials in order that product performance predictions (including risk assessment and product stewardship when needed) can be made reliably and effectively. Such characterization techniques revolve around the main controlling properties of nanomaterials that can be recalled by means of the 4 S acronym mnemonic:• Size: Properties are seen only in certain size ranges: for example, the wavelength emitted by quantum dots is directly related to the size of the “particle.”• Shape: Carbon nanotubes provide unique properties for materials of extremely high aspect ratio.• Surface: Composition, charge, chemistry, and corona, noting that the surface properties are likely to be very different from the bulk properties.• Solubility: Increased solubility and solubility rate arise through small sizes and increased surface area. Many poorly soluble biopharmaceutical products need to be produced in nanoform to overcome such issues.This chapter explores the main tools available to the researcher in order to gain an insight into the performance prediction and toxicology understanding, including the ultimate fate of nanomaterials in the environment, when the nanomaterials come to be used and employed from a practical perspective.
References
- EU (2011) Commission Recommendation of 18 October 2011 on the definition of a nanomaterial (2011/696/EU), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32011H0696 (accessed 22 December 2015).
- EU-OSHA – European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (last modified on 1 March 2016) Definitions, uses, hazards etc of nanomaterials http://oshwiki.eu/wiki/Nanomaterials (accessed 26 September 2016.
- Adair, J.H., Roese, A.J., and McCoy, G.L. (1984) Particle-size analysis of ceramic powders, processing for improved productivity, in Advances in Ceramics, vol. 11 (ed. K.M. Nair), The American Ceramic Society, Columbus, OH.
- Krarup, H., Mandanas, M., and Adair, J. (1999) Physical characterization of fine powders. Fine Powder Processing '99 University Park, PA.
- German, R.M. (1996) A measure of the number of particles in agglomerates. Int. J. Powder Metall., 32 (4), 365–373.
- ANSI-NSP (2004) Public document NSP SC 027–2004, http://publicaa.ansi.org/sites/apdl/Documents/Standards%20Activities/ANSI-NSP/ANSI-NSP%20SC%20027-2004%20Recommendations.pdf (accessed 21 December 2015.
- Wohlleben, W., Kuhlbusch, T.A.J., Schnekenburger, J., and Lehr, C.-M. (2015) Safety of Nanomaterials along Their Lifecycle: Release, Exposure, and Human Hazards, CRC Press, p. 4.
-
Safer, A.
(2005)
Easier, faster synthesis for CdSe quantum dot nanocrystals.
J. Chem. Educ.,
82,
1697–1699.
10.1021/ed082p1697 Google Scholar
- Qu, L. and Peng, X. (2002) Control of photoluminescence properties of CdSe nanocrystals in growth. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124 (9), 2049–2055.
-
Mie, G.
(1908)
Beiträge zur optik trüber medien, speziell kolloidaler metallösungen annalen der physik.
Ann. Phys.,
330 (3),
377–455.
10.1002/andp.19083300302 Google Scholar
- Burg, T.P. and Manalis, S.R. (2003) Suspended microchannel resonators for biomolecular detection. Appl. Phys. Lett., 83 (13), 2698–2700.
- Godin, M., Bryan, A.K., Burg, T.P., Babcock, K., and Manalis, S.R. (2007) Measuring the mass, density, and size of particles and cells using a suspended microchannel resonator. Appl. Phys. Lett., 91, 123121.
- Rawle, A.F. (1993) Basic principles of particle size analysis. Malvern Instruments Application Note MRK034 Originally published in 1993 and available from a wide variety of Internet resources in different languages.
- Heywood, H. (1954) Comment on page S177 following Sessions F&G, Automatized counting and sizing, in The Physics of Particle Size Analysis, IoP.
- US Pharmacopeia (2014) Chapter 37 Physical Tests/<776> Optical Microscopy United States Pharmacopeia Rockville, MD http://hmc.usp.org/sites/default/files/documents/HMC/GCs-Pdfs/c776.pdf (accessed 26 September 2016).
- H. Heywood (1967) Comment (and more) on page 27 follows the paper: H. H. Hausner “Characterisation of the powder particle shape” 20 – 28 in Particle Size Analysis: Proceedings of a Conference Organised by the Society for Analytical Chemistry and Held at Loughborough University of Technology 14–16 September 1966, the Society for Analytical Chemistry, London.
- ISO 9276-6: (2008) Representation of results of particle size analysis. Part 6: descriptive and quantitative representation of particle shape and morphology, International Standards Organization, Geneva http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=39389 (accessed 2 February 2016.
- For example: Laborda, F., Bolea, E., and Jiménez-Lamana, J. (2014) Single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry: a powerful tool for nanoanalysis. Anal. Chem., 86, 2270–2278.
-
Gregg, S.J. and
Sing, K.S.W.
(1967)
Adsorption, Surface Area and Porosity,
Academic Press London,
New York.
10.1149/1.2426447 Google Scholar
- Anderson, J.R. (1975) Structure of Metallic Catalysts, Academic Press.
- Rawle, A.F. (2007) Micron-sized nano-materials. Powder Technol., 174 (1–2), 6–9.
- Tománek, D., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, V., and Bennemann, K.H. (1982) Calculation of chemisorption and absorption induced surface segregation. Surf. Sci., 114 (1), 11–22.
- Nutta, M.O., Hecka, K.N., Alvarezb, P., and Wonga, M.S. (2006) Improved Pd-on-Au bimetallic nanoparticle catalysts for aqueous-phase trichloroethene hydrodechlorination. Appl. Catal., B, 69 (1–2), 115–125.
- Riddick, T.M. (1968) Control of colloid stability through zeta potential: with a closing chapter on its relationship to cardiovascular disease. Published for Zeta-Meter, Inc., by Livingston Pub. Co.
- del Pino, P. et al. (2014) Protein corona formation around nanoparticles: from the past to the future. Mater. Horiz., 1, 301–313.
- Rangel-Yagui, C.O., Pessoa, A., Jr. and Tavares, L.C. (2005) Micellar solubilization of drugs. J. Pharm. Pharmaceut Sci, 8 (2), 147–163. http://www.ualberta.ca/∼csps/JPPS8(2)/C.Rangel-Yagui/solubilization.htm (accessed 16 December 2015).
- Vemula, V.R., Lagishetty, V., and Lingala, S. (2010) Solubility enhancement techniques. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Rev. Res., 5 (1), 41–51.
- Arts, J.H.E. et al. (2015) A decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping). Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 71 (2), Supplement, S1–S27.
- Regis, E. (1995) Nano: the Emerging Science of Nanotechnology, 1st edn, Little, Brown and Company, pp. 207–208 (the quote actually spills over two pages!).
- Drexler, K.E. (1992) Nanosystems: Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing, and Computation, John Wiley & Sons. The quote is found on page xviii in a topic entitled “Criticism of criticism.”
- US Pharmacopeia (2011) General Chapter USP <711> Dissolution, the United States Pharmacopeial Convention, http://www.usp.org/sites/default/files/usp_pdf/EN/USPNF/2011-02-25711DISSOLUTION.pdf (accessed 2 February 2016.
-
Murashov, V.
(2011)
Nanotechnology Standards
(ed. John Howard),
Springer.
10.1007/978-1-4419-7853-0 Google Scholar
- ASTM E2490-09 (2015) Standard Guide for Measurement of Particle Size Distribution of Nanomaterials in Suspension by Photon Correlation Spectroscopy (PCS), ASTM International, Philadelphia, PA, http://www.astm.org/Standards/E2490.htm (accessed 2 February, 2016.
- Roebben, G., Ramirez-Garcia, S., Hackley, V.A., Roesslein, M., Klaessig, F., Kestens, V., Lynch, I., Garner, C.M., Rawle, A., Elder, A., Colvin, V.L. et al. (2011) Interlaboratory comparison of size and surface charge measurements on nanoparticles prior to biological impact assessment. J. Nanopart. Res., 13, 2675–2687. http://www.springerlink.com/content/n2846p0p72057wm8/ (accessed 16 December 2015.
- Roebben, G, et al. (2014) Reference materials and representative test materials to develop nanoparticle characterization methods: the NanoChOp project case, http://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/publication/reference-materials-and-representative-test-materials-develop-nanoparticle-characterization-methods (accessed 26 September 2016.
- Linsinger, T. et al. (2012) Requirements on measurements for the implementation of the European Commission definition of the term “nanomaterial” http://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/default/files/irmm_nanomaterials_%28online%29.pdf (accessed 26 September 2016.
- Environmental Protection Agency (2015) 40 CFR Part 704 [EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0572; FRL–9920–90] RIN 2070–AJ54 Chemical Substances When Manufactured or Processed as Nanoscale Materials; TSCA Reporting and Recordkeeping Requirements, Federal Register Vol. 80, No. 65 Monday, April 6, 2015 Page 18330 Proposed Rules, http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-04-06/pdf/2015-07497.pdf (accessed 26 September 2016).
- Rawle, A.F. (2010) Instrument qualification and performance verification for particle size instruments, in Practical Approaches to Method Validation and Essential Instrument Qualification (eds Chung Chow Chan, Herman Lam, and Xue-Ming Zhang), Wiley-Blackwell, Chapter 12, tinyur.com/cko9ea7 (accessed 16 December 2015).
- Rawle, A.F. (2014) Characterization is a number (42) – not a goal, Blog, http://www.materials-talks.com/blog/2014/02/06/characterization-is-a-number-42-not-a-goal/ (accessed 26 September 2016).