Chapter 15

Management of Low-Grade Gliomas

R. Soffietti

R. Soffietti

University Hospital San Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
B. Baumert

B. Baumert

Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
L. Bello

L. Bello

University of Milan, Milan, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
A. von Deimling

A. von Deimling

University of Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
H. Duffau

H. Duffau

Hôpital Gui de Chauliac, Montpellier, France

Search for more papers by this author
M. Frénay

M. Frénay

Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France

Search for more papers by this author
W. Grisold

W. Grisold

Kaiser Franz Josef Hospital, Vienna, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
R. Grant

R. Grant

Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
F. Graus

F. Graus

Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
K. Hoang-Xuan

K. Hoang-Xuan

Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
M. Klein

M. Klein

VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
B. Melin

B. Melin

Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
J. Rees

J. Rees

National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, United Kingdom

Search for more papers by this author
T. Siegal

T. Siegal

Hadassah Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel

Search for more papers by this author
A. Smits

A. Smits

University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
R. Stupp

R. Stupp

University Hospital and University, Lausanne, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
W. Wick

W. Wick

University of Heidelberg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 September 2011
Citations: 1

Summary

Background: Diffuse infiltrative low-grade gliomas (LGGs) of the cerebral hemispheres in the adult are a group of tumours with distinct clinical, histological and molecular characteristics, and there are still controversies in management.

Methods: The scientific evidence collected from the literature was evaluated and graded according to EFNS guidelines, and recommendations were made.

Results and conclusions: The WHO classification recognizes grade II astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas. Conventional MRI is used for differential diagnosis, guiding surgery, planning radiotherapy and monitoring treatment response. Advanced imaging techniques can increase diagnostic accuracy. Younger age, normal neurological examination, oligodendroglial histology and 1p loss are favourable prognostic factors. Prophylactic antiepileptic drugs are not useful, and there is no evidence that one drug is better than any other7. Total or near-total resection can improve seizure control and progression-free and overall survival, while reducing the risk of malignant transformation. Early postoperative radiotherapy improves progression-free but not overall survival. Low doses of radiation are as effective as high doses and are better tolerated. Modern radiotherapy techniques reduce the risk of late cognitive deficits. Chemotherapy can be useful both at recurrence after radiotherapy and as initial treatment after surgery to delay the risk of late neurotoxicity from large-field radiotherapy. Neurocognitive deficits are frequent and can be caused by the tumour itself, tumour-related epilepsy, treatments and psychological distress.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.