Chapter 8
Echocardiography of Aortic Stenosis
Michael J. Kostal MD,
Susan E. Wiegers MD,
Michael J. Kostal MD
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, PA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorSusan E. Wiegers MD
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, PA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorMichael J. Kostal MD,
Susan E. Wiegers MD,
Michael J. Kostal MD
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, PA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorSusan E. Wiegers MD
Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, PA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorBook Editor(s):Jürgen Haase MD, PhD, FESC, FACC,
Hans-Joachim Schäfers MD, PhD,
Horst Sievert MD, FESC, FACC,
Ron Waksman MD, FACC,
Jürgen Haase MD, PhD, FESC, FACC
Professor of Medicine Consultant Cardiologist
Kardiocentrum Frankfurt, Klinik Rotes Kreuz, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorHans-Joachim Schäfers MD, PhD
Professor of Surgery Chair
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorHorst Sievert MD, FESC, FACC
Professor of Medicine Head
Department of Cardiology, CardioVascular Center Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorRon Waksman MD, FACC
Professor of Medicine Associate Director Director
Division of Cardiology, Washington, DC, USA
Experimental Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC, USA
Search for more papers by this authorFirst published: 10 May 2010
Summary
This chapter contains sections titled:
-
Anatomic evaluation of the aortic valve
-
Assessment of severity of aortic stenosis
-
Novel echocardiographic techniques
-
Conclusion
-
References
References
- Stoddard MF, Hammons RT, & Longaker RA (1996) Doppler transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis. Am Heart J 132: 337–342.
- Mallavarapu RK & Nanda NC (2007) Three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiographic assessment of aortic stenosis and regurgitation. Cardiol Clin 25: 327–234.
- Ge S, Warner JG, Jr., Abraham TP, et al. (1998) Three-dimensional surface area of the aortic valve orifice by three-dimensional echocardiography: clinical validation of a novel index for assessment of aortic stenosis. Am Heart J 136: 1042–1050.
- Kasprzak JD, Salustri A, Roelandt JR, & Ten Cate FJ (1998) Three-dimensional echocardiography of the aortic valve: feasibility, clinical potential, and limitations. Echocardiography 15: 127–138.
- Goland S, Trento A, Iida K, et al. (2007) Assessment of aortic stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography: an accurate and novel approach. Heart 93: 801–807.
- Williams DE, Sahn DJ, & Friedman WF (1976) Cross-sectional echocardiographic localization of sites of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Am J Cardiol 37: 250–255.
- Chang S, Clements S, & Chang J (1977) Aortic stenosis: echocardio-graphic cusp separation and surgical description of aortic valve in 22 patients. Am J Cardiol 39: 499–504.
- Lesbre JP, Scheuble C, Kalisa A, Lalau JD, & Andrejak MT (1983) [Echocardiography in the diagnosis of severe aortic valve stenosis in adults]. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss 76: 1–12.
- DeMaria AN, Bommer W, Joye J, Lee G, Bouteller J, & Mason DT (1980) Value and limitations of cross-sectional echocardiography of the aortic valve in the diagnosis and quantification of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 62: 304–312.
- Godley RW, Green D, Dillon JC, Rogers EW, Feigenbaum H, & Weyman AE (1981) Reliability of two-dimensional echocardiography in assessing the severity of valvular aortic stenosis. Chest 79: 657–662.
- Okura H, Yoshida K, Hozumi T, Akasaka T, & Yoshikawa J (1997) Planimetry and transthoracic two-dimensional echocardiography in noninvasive assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 30: 753–759.
- Weyman AE, Feigebaum H, Dillon JC, & Chang S (1975) Cross-sectional echocardiography in assessing the severity of valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 52: 828–834.
- Cormier B, Iung B, Porte JM, Barbant S, & Vahanian A (1996) Value of multiplane transesophageal echocardiography in determining aortic valve area in aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 77: 882–885.
- Tribouilloy C, Shen WF, Peltier M, Mirode A, Rey JL, & Lesbre JP (1994) Quantitation of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis with multiplane transesophageal echocardiography: comparison with monoplane transesophageal approach. Am Heart J 128: 526–532.
- Hoffmann R, Flachskampf FA, & Hanrath P (1993) Planimetry of orifice area in aortic stenosis using multiplane transesophageal echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 22: 529–534.
- Kim CJ, Berglund H, Nishioka T, Luo H, & Siegel RJ (1996) Correspondence of aortic valve area determination from transesophageal echocardiography, trans thoracic echocardiography, and cardiac catheterization. Am Heart J 132: 1163–1172.
- Stoddard MF, Arce J, Liddell NE, Peters G, Dillon S, & Kupersmith J (1991) Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis. Am Heart J 122: 1415–1422.
- Bernard Y, Meneveau N, Vuillemenot A, et al. (1997) Planimetry of aortic valve area using multiplane transoesophageal echocardiography is not a reliable method for assessing severity of aortic stenosis. Heart 78: 68–73.
- Blot-Souletie N, Hebrard A, Acar P, Carrie D, & Puel J (2007) Comparison of accuracy of aortic valve area assessment in aortic stenosis by real time three-dimensional echocardiography in biplane mode versus two-dimensional transthoracic and transesophageal echo cardiography. Echocardiography 24: 1065–1072.
- Garcia D & Kadem L (2006) What do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or Gorlin area? J Heart Valve Dis 15: 601–608.
- Kadem L, Rieu R, Dumesnil JG, Durand LG, & Pibarot P (2006) Flow-dependent changes in Doppler-derived aortic valve effective orifice area are real and not due to artifact. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 131–137.
- Donal E, Novaro GM, Deserrano D, et al. (2005) Planimetric assessment of anatomic valve area overestimates effective orifice area in bicuspid aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18: 1392–1398.
- Otto CM (2006) Valvular aortic stenosis: disease severity and timing of intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol 47: 2141–2151.
- Currie PJ, Seward JB, Reeder GS, et al. (1985) Continuous-wave Doppler echocardiographic assessment of severity of calcific aortic stenosis: a simultaneous Doppler-catheter correlative study in 100 adult patients. Circulation 71: 1162–1169.
- Berger M, Berdoff RL, Gallerstein PE, & Goldberg E (1984) Evaluation of aortic stenosis by continuous wave Doppler ultrasound. J Am Coll Cardiol 3: 150–156.
- Kosturakis D, Allen HD, Goldberg SJ, Sahn DJ, & Valdes-Cruz LM (1984) Noninvasive quantification of stenotic semilunar valve areas by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 3: 1256–1262.
- Simpson IA, Houston AB, Sheldon CD, Hutton I, & Lawrie TD (1985) Clinical value of Doppler echocardio graphy in the assessment of adults with aortic stenosis. Br Heart J 53: 636–639.
- Pellikka PA, Nishimura RA, Bailey KR, & Tajik AJ (1990) The natural history of adults with asymptomatic, hemodynamically significant aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 15: 1012–1017.
- Bonow RO, Carabello BA, Kanu C, et al. (2006) ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (writing Committee to Revise the 1998 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease) developed in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 48: e1–148.
- Kadem L, Garcia D, Durand LG, Rieu R, Dumesnil JG, & Pibarot P (2006) Value and limitations of peak-to-peak gradient for evaluation of aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 15: 609–616.
- Adele C, Vaitkus PT, & Tischler MD (1997) Evaluation of the significance of a transvalvular catheter on aortic valve gradient in aortic stenosis: a direct hemodynamic and Doppler echocardio-graphic study. Am J Cardiol 79: 513–516.
- Laskey WK & Kussmaul WG (1994) Pressure recovery in aortic valve stenosis. Circulation 89: 116–121.
- Voelker W, Reul H, Stelzer T, Schmidt A, & Karsch KR (1992) Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: an in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model. J Am Coll Cardiol 20: 1585–1593.
- Baumgartner H, Khan S, DeRobertis M, Czer L, & Maurer G (1990) Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery. Circulation 82: 1467–1475.
- Levine RA, Jimoh A, Cape EG, McMillan S, Yoganathan AP, & Weyman AE (1989) Pressure recovery distal to a stenosis: potential cause of gradient “overestimation” by Doppler echo-cardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 13: 706–715.
- Cape EG, Jones M, Yamada I, VanAuker MD, & Valdes-Cruz LM (1996) Turbulent/viscous interactions control Doppler/catheter pressure discrepancies in aortic stenosis. The role of the Reynolds number. Circulation 94: 2975–2981.
- Niederberger J, Schima H, Maurer G, & Baumgartner H (1996) Importance of pressure recovery for the assessment of aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound. Role of aortic size, aortic valve area, and direction of the stenotic jet in vitro. Circulation 94: 1934–1940.
- Rhodes KD, Stroml JA, Rahman MM, & VanAuker MD (2007) Prediction of pressure recovery location in aortic valve stenosis: an in-vitro validation study. J Heart Valve Dis 16: 489–494.
- Garcia D, Dumesnil JG, Durand LG, Kadem L, & Pibarot P (2003) Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of valve effective orifice area can be predicted from the pressure recovery phenomenon: practical implications with regard to quantification of aortic stenosis severity. J Am Coll Cardiol 41: 435–442.
- Razzolini R, Manica A, Tarantini G, Ramondo A, Napodano M, & Iliceto S (2007) Discrepancies between catheter and Doppler estimates of aortic stenosis: the role of pressure recovery evaluated “in vivo”. J Heart Valve Dis 16: 225–229.
- Isaaz K, Gaillard O, Cerisier A, et al. (2004) How important is the impact of pressure recovery on routine evaluation of aortic stenosis? A clinical study in 91 patients. J Heart Valve Dis 13: 347–356.
- Zoghbi WA, Farmer KL, Soto JG, Nelson JG, & Quinones MA (1986) Accurate noninvasive quantification of stenotic aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography. Circulation 73: 452–459.
- Skjaerpe T, Hegrenaes L, & Hatle L (1985) Noninvasive estimation of valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by Doppler ultrasound and two-dimensional echocardiography. Circulation 72: 810–818.
- Otto CM, Pearlman AS, Comess KA, Reamer RP, Janko CL, & Huntsman LL (1986) Determination of the stenotic aortic valve area in adults using Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 7: 509–517.
- Richards KL, Cannon SR, Miller JF, & Crawford MH (1986) Calculation of aortic valve area by Doppler echocardiography: a direct application of the continuity equation. Circulation 73: 964–969.
- Dittmann H, Voelker W, Karsch KR, & Seipel L (1987) Influence of sampling site and flow area on cardiac output measurements by Doppler echocardio graphy. J Am Coll Cardiol 10: 818–823.
- Oh JK, Taliercio CP, Holmes DR, Jr., et al. (1988) Prediction of the severity of aortic stenosis by Doppler aortic valve area determination: prospective Doppler-catheterization correlation in 100 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 11: 1227–1234.
- Teirstein P, Yeager M, Yock PG, & Popp RL (1986) Doppler echocardiographic measurement of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis: a noninvasive applica tion of the Gorlin formula. J Am Coll Cardiol 8: 1059–1065.
- Cannon SR, Richards KL, & Crawford M (1985) Hydraulic estimation of stenotic orifice area: a correction of the Gorlin formula. Circulation 71: 1170–1178.
- Blackshear JL, Kapples EJ, Lane GE, & Safford RE (1992) Beat-by-beat aortic valve area measurements indicate constant orifice area in aortic stenosis: analysis of Doppler data with varying RR intervals. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 5: 414–420.
- Casale PN, Palacios IF, Abascal VM, et al. (1992) Effects of dobutamine on Gorlin and continuity equation valve areas and valve resistance in valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 70: 1175–1179.
- Lee TM, Su SF, Chen MF, Liau CS, & Lee YT (1996) Effects of increasing flow rate on aortic stenotic indices: evidence from percutaneous transvenous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve in patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis. Heart 76: 490–494.
- Burwash IG, Pearlman AS, Kraft CD, Miyake-Hull C, Healy NL, & Otto CM (1994) Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise. J Am Coll Cardiol 24: 1342–1350.
- Burwash IG, Thomas DD, Sadahiro M, et al. (1994) Dependence of Gorlin formula and continuity equation valve areas on transvalvular volume flow rate in valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 89: 827–835.
- Rask LP, Karp KH, & Eriksson NP (1996) Flow dependence of the aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis: assessment by application of the continuity equation. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 9: 295–299.
- Myreng Y, Molstad P, Endresen K, & Ihlen H (1990) Reproducibility of echocardiographic estimates of the area of stenosed aortic valves using the continuity equation. Int J Cardiol 26: 349–354; discussion 355–359.
- Gutierrez-Chico JL, Zamorano JL, Prieto-Moriche E, et al. (2008) Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography in aortic stenosis: a novel, simple, and reliable method to improve accuracy in area calculation. Eur Heart J 29: 1296–1306.
- Doddamani S, Bello R, Friedman MA, et al. (2007) Demonstration of left ventricular outflow tract eccentricity by real time 3D echocardiography: implications for the determination of aortic valve area. Echocardio graphy 24: 860–866.
- Gueret P, Meerbaum S, Zwehl W, et al. (1981) Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular stroke volume: experimental correlation with thermodilution and cineangiography in normal and ischemic states. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 7: 247–258.
- Mercier JC, DiSessa TG, Jarmakani JM, et al. (1982) Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in children. Circulation 65: 962–969.
- St John Sutton M, Otterstat JE, Plappert T, et al. (1998) Quantitation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in post-infarction patients from biplane and single plane two-dimensional echocardiograms. A prospective longitudinal study of 371 patients. Eur Heart J 19: 808–816.
- Wahr DW, Wang YS, & Schiller NB (1983) Left ventricular volumes determined by two-dimensional echocardiography in a normal adult population. J Am Coll Cardiol 1: 863–868.
- Dumont Y & Arsenault M (2003) An alternative to standard continuity equation for the calculation of aortic valve area by echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16: 1309–1315.
- Kim WY, Sogaard P, Egeblad H, Andersen NT, & Kristensen B (2001) Three-dimensional echocardiography with tissue harmonic imaging shows excellent reproducibility in assessment of left ventricular volumes. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 14: 612–617.
- Kim WY, Sogaard P, Mortensen PT, et al. (2001) Three dimensional echocardiography documents haemodynamic improvement by biventricular pacing in patients with severe heart failure. Heart 85: 514–520.
- Mannaerts HF, Van Der Heide JA, Kamp O, et al. (2003) Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using freehand transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16: 101–109.
- Lange RA & Hillis LD (2006) Dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with low-gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation 113: 1718–1720.
- deFilippi CR, Willett DL, Brickner ME, et al. (1995) Usefulness of dobutamine echocardio graphy in distinguishing severe from nonsevere valvular aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular function and low transvalvular gradients. Am J Cardiol 75: 191–194.
- Bermejo J & Yotti R (2007) Low-gradient aortic valve stenosis: value and limitations of dobutamine stress testing. Heart 93: 298–302.
- Schwammenthal E, Vered Z, Moshkowitz Y, et al. (2001) Dobutamine echocardio graphy in patients with aortic stenosis and left ventricular dysfunction: predicting outcome as a function of management strategy. Chest 119: 1766–1777.
- Monin JL, Quere JP, Monchi M, et al. (2003) Low-gradient aortic stenosis: operative risk stratification and predictors for long-term outcome: a multicenter study using dobutamine stress hemodynamics. Circulation 108: 319–324.
- Wu WC, Ireland LA, & Sadaniantz A (2004) Evaluation of aortic valve disorders using stress echocardiography. Echocardio graphy 21: 459–466.
- Chambers J (2006) Low “gradient”, low flow aortic stenosis. Heart 92: 554–558.
- Monin JL, Monchi M, Gest V, Duval-Moulin AM, Dubois-Rande JL, & Gueret P (2001) Aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction and low transvalvular pressure gradients: risk stratification by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 37: 2101–2107.
- Blais C, Burwash IG, Mundigler G, et al. (2006) Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study. Circulation 113: 711–721.
- Nishimura RA, Grantham JA, Connolly HM, Schaff HV, Higano ST, & Holmes DR, Jr. (2002) Low-output, low-gradient aortic stenosis in patients with depressed left ventricular systolic function: the clinical utility of the dobutamine challenge in the catheterization laboratory. Circulation 106: 809–813.
- Quere JP, Monin JL, Levy F, et al. (2006) Influence of preoperative left ventricular contractile reserve on postoperative ejection fraction in low-gradient aortic stenosis. Circulation 113: 1738–1744.
- Burwash IG, Hay KM, & Chan KL (2002) Hemodynamic stability of valve area, valve resistance, and stroke work loss in aortic stenosis: a comparative analysis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15: 814–822.
- Blais C, Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG, Garcia D, Chen D, & Durand LG (2001) Comparison of valve resistance with effective orifice area regarding flow dependence. Am J Cardiol 88: 45–52.
- Lin SS, Roger VL, Pascoe R, Seward JB, & Pellikka PA (1998) Dobutamine stress Doppler hemodynamics in patients with aortic stenosis: feasibility, safety, and surgical correlations. Am Heart J 136: 1010–1016.
- Plonska E, Szyszka A, Kasprzak J, et al. (2001) [Side effects during dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis]. Pol Merkur Lekarski 11: 406–410.
- Takeda S, Rimington H, & Chambers J (2001) Prediction of symptom-onset in aortic stenosis: a comparison of pressure drop/flow slope and haemodynamic measures at rest. Int J Cardiol 81: 131–137, discussion 138–139.
- Bountioukos M, Kertai MD, Schinkel AF, et al. (2003) Safety of dobutamine stress echocardiography in patients with aortic stenosis. J Heart Valve Dis 12: 441–446.
- Ennezat PV, Toussaint J, Marechaux S, et al. (2007) Low-level exercise echocardiography fails to elicit left ventricular contractile reserve in patients with aortic stenosis, reduced ejection fraction, and low transvalvular gradient. Echocardiography 24: 47–51.
- Hoffer EP, Dewe W, Celentano C, & Pierard LA (1999) Low-level exercise echocardiography detects contractile reserve and predicts reversible dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: comparison with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 34: 989–997.
- Otto CM, Pearlman AS, Kraft CD, Miyake-Hull CY, Burwash IG, & Gardner CJ (1992) Physiologic changes with maximal exercise in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis assessed by Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 20: 1160–1167.
- Das P, Rimington H, & Chambers J (2005) Exercise testing to stratify risk in aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J 26: 1309–1313.
- Chambers J & Das P (2001) Treadmill exercise in apparently asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Heart 86: 361–362.
- Lancellotti P, Lebois F, Simon M, Tombeux C, Chauvel C, & Pierard LA (2005) Prognostic importance of quantitative exercise Doppler echocardiography in asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Circulation 112(Suppl.): I377–I382.
- Antonini-Canterin F, Faggiano P, Zanuttini D, & Ribichini F (1999) Is aortic valve resistance more clinically meaningful than valve area in aortic stenosis? Heart 82: 9–10.
- Bermejo J, Garcia-Fernandez MA, Torrecilla EG, et al. (1996) Effects of dobutamine on Doppler echocardiographic indexes of aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 28: 1206–1213.
- Blitz LR & Herrmann HC (1996) Hemodynamic assessment of patients with low-flow, low-gradient valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 78: 657–661.
- Cannon JD Jr., Zile MR, Crawford FA, Jr., & Carabello BA (1992) Aortic valve resistance as an adjunct to the Gorlin formula in assessing the severity of aortic stenosis in symptomatic patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 20: 1517–1523.
- Ho PP, Pauls GL, Lamberton DF, Portnoff JS, Pai RG, & Shah PM (1994) Doppler derived aortic valve resistance in aortic stenosis: its hemodynamic validation. J Heart Valve Dis 3: 283–287.
- Mascherbauer J, Schima H, Rosenhek R, Czerny M, Maurer G, & Baumgartner H (2004) Value and limitations of aortic valve resistance with particular consideration of low flowlow gradient aortic stenosis: an in vitro study. Eur Heart J 25: 787–793.
- Roger VL, Seward JB, Bailey KR, Oh JK, & Mullany CJ (1997) Aortic valve resistance in aortic stenosis: Doppler echocardio-graphic study and surgical correlation. Am Heart J 134: 924–929.
- Voelker W, Reul H, Nienhaus G, et al. (1995) Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model. Circulation 91: 1196–1204.
- Rosenhek R, Binder T, Porenta G, et al. (2000) Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis. N Engl J Med 343: 611–617.
- Bahler RC, Desser DR, Finkelhor RS, Brener SJ, & Youssefi M (1999) Factors leading to progression of valvular aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 84: 1044–1048.
- Shavelle DM, Buljabasic N, Takasu J, et al. (2006) Validation of the severity index by cardiac catheterization and Doppler echocardiography in patients with aortic sclerosis and stenosis. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 4: 12.
- Dwivedi G, Hickman M, & Senior R (2006) Accurate assessment of aortic stenosis with intravenous contrast. Eur J Echocardiogr 7: 65–67.
- Smith LA, Cowell SJ, White AC, et al. (2004) Contrast agent increases Doppler velocities and improves reproducibility of aortic valve area measurements in patients with aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 17: 247–252.
- Hansen WH, Behrenbeck T, Spittell PC, Gilman G, & Seward JB (2005) Biphasic Doppler pattern of the descending thoracic aorta: a new echocardiographic finding in patients with aortic valve stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18: 860–864.
- Chambers J, Rajani R, Hankins M, & Cook R (2005) The peak to mean pressure decrease ratio: a new method of assessing aortic stenosis. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 18: 674–678.
- Haghi D, Kaden JJ, & Suselbeck T (2007) Validation of the peak to mean pressure decrease ratio as a new method of assessing aortic stenosis using the Gorlin formula and the cardiovascular magnetic resonance-based hybrid method. Echocardiography 24: 335–339.
- Haghi D, Papavassiliu T, Kalmar G, et al. (2005) A hybrid approach for quantification of aortic valve stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 7: 581–586.
- Douglas PS, Khandheria B, Stainback RF, et al. (2007) ACCF/ ASE/ACEP/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2007 appropriateness criteria for transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group, American Society of Echocardiography, American College of Emergency Physicians, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. Endorsed by the American College of Chest Physicians and the Society of Critical Care Medicine. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 20: 787–805.
