Deep Carious Lesions and the Dental Pulp
Falk Schwendicke
Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité Centre for Dental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorNicola P. Innes
Department of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorFalk Schwendicke
Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry, Charité Centre for Dental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
Search for more papers by this authorNicola P. Innes
Department of Paediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
Search for more papers by this authorPD Dr. med. dent. Klaus W. Neuhaus MMA MAS
Clinic of Periodontology, Endodontology and Cariology, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Private dental office, Herzogenbuchsee, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorProf. em. Dr. med. dent. Adrian Lussi dipl. Chem.Ing. ETHZ
Department of Preventive, Restorative and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dental Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
Deep carious lesions can often be managed with minimum-intervention approaches, even when they are associated with pain. This depends on the correct diagnosis (reversible pulpitis, irreversible pulpitis, pulp necrosis with or without periradicular periodontitis) being established, allowing choice of the correct treatment.
When the pulp is reversibly inflamed (reversible pulpitis), it is possible to resolve pain by simply managing the carious lesion. By removing the carious lesion, inactivating it or slowing its progress, the reactionary dentin being laid down by the dental pulp can provide enough of a barrier for the pulp to stop the stimulus that is causing it to be inflamed. However, removing the lesion completely can compromise the dental pulp (through irritation or exposure). This means that for deep carious lesions which are pain-free or where there is reversible pulpitis, optimal management for the dental pulp (to maintain its health) is through inactivation or selective removal (reducing its potency). This maintains as much of the tooth's integrity as possible. However, if the pulp has reached a stage where it is irreversibly inflamed, the only possibilities are to remove it and carry out a root canal treatment or to extract the tooth.
The options for managing the deep carious lesion are: nonselective removal; stepwise removal; selective removal; no removal and sealing; and no removal and a nonrestorative cavity-control approach (only appropriate for a deciduous tooth). A short summary of these methods is given in this chapter, together with indications for choosing the correct treatment options.
References
- Aguilar, P., Linsuwanont, P. 2011. Vital pulp therapy in vital permanent teeth with cariously exposed pulp: a systematic review. Journal of Endodontics, 37, 581–7.
- Alkarimi, H. A., Watt, R. G., Pikhart, H., Sheiham, A., Tsakos, G. 2014. Dental caries and growth in school-age children. Pediatrics, 133, e616–23.
- American Academy Of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD). 2016. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): classifications, consequences, and preventive strategies. Pediatric Dentistry, 38, 52–4.
- American Association of Endodontists (AAE). 2015. Glossary of Endondotic Terms. Chicago, IL: American Association of Endodontists.
- Bakhshandeh, A., Qvist, V., Ekstrand, K. 2012. Sealing occlusal caries lesions in adults referred for restorative treatment: 2–3 years of follow-up. Clinical Oral Investigations, 16, 521–19.
- Bjørndal, L., Fransson, H., Bruun, G., Markvart, M., Kjaeldgaard, M., Näsman, P., et al. 2017. Randomized clinical trials on deep carious lesions: 5-year follow-up. Journal of Dental Research, 96, 747–53.
- Blumenshine, S. L., Vann, W. F., Gizlice, Z., Lee, J. Y. 2008. Children's school performance: impact of general and oral health. Journal of Public Health Dentistry, 68, 82.
- Chadwick, B. L., Evans, D. J. 2007. Restoration of class II cavities in primary molar teeth with conventional and resin modified glass ionomer cements: a systematic review of the literature. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry, 8, 14–21.
- Demarco, F. F., Correa, M. B., Cenci, M. S., Moraes, R. R., Opdam, N. J. 2012. Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dental Materials, 28, 87–101.
- Fusayama, T., Kurosaki, N. 1972. Structure and removal of carious dentin. International Dental Journal, 22, 401–11.
- Gilchrist, F., Marshman, Z., Deery, C., Rodd, H. D. 2015. The impact of dental caries on children and young people: what they have to say? International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry, 25, 327–38.
- Göstemeyer, G., Schwendicke, F. 2016. Inhibition of hybrid layer degradation by cavity pretreatment: meta- and trial sequential analysis. Journal of Dentistry, 49, 14–21.
- Hesse, D., Bonifacio, C. C., Mendes, F. M., Braga, M. M., Imparato, J. C., Raggio, D. P. 2014. Sealing versus partial caries removal in primary molars: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health, 14, 58.
- Hesse, D., De Araujo, M. P., Olegário, I. C., Innes, N. P., Raggio, D. P., Bonifácio, C. C. 2016. Atraumatic restorative treatment compared to the Hall Technique for occluso-proximal cavities in primary molars: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials, 17, 169.
- Hevinga, M. A., Opdam, N. J., Frencken, J. E., Truin, G. J., Huysmans, M. C. 2010. Does incomplete caries removal reduce strength of restored teeth? Journal of Dental Research, 89, 1270–5.
- Hickel, R., Kaaden, C., Paschos, E., Buerkle, V., García-Godoy, F., Manhart, J. 2005. Longevity of occlusally-stressed restorations in posterior primary teeth. American Journal Dentistry, 18, 198–211.
- Innes, N. P. T., Schwendicke, F. 2017. Restorative thresholds for carious lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research, 96, 501–8.
- Innes, N. P., Evans, D. J., Stirrups, D. R. 2007. The Hall Technique; a randomized controlled clinical trial of a novel method of managing carious primary molars in general dental practice: acceptability of the technique and outcomes at 23 months. BMC Oral Health, 7, 18.
- Innes, N. P., Evans, D. J., Stirrups, D. R. 2011. Sealing caries in primary molars: randomized control trial, 5-year results. Journal of Dental Research, 90, 1405–10.
- Innes, N. P., Frencken, J. E., Bjorndal, L., Maltz, M., Manton, D. J., Ricketts, D., et al. 2016. Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on terminology. Advances in Dental Research, 28, 49–57.
- Jackson, S. L., Vann, W. F. Jr., Kotch, J. B., Pahel, B. T., Lee, J. Y. 2011. Impact of poor oral health on children's school attendance and performance. American Journal of Public Health, 101, 1900–6.
- Kassebaum, N., Bernabe, E., Dahiya, M., Bhandari, B., Murray, C., Marcenes, W. 2015. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. Journal of Dental Research, 94(5), 650–8.
- Klinke, T., Daboul, A., Turek, A., Frankenberger, R., Hickel, R., Biffar, R. 2016. Clinical performance during 48 months of two current glass ionomer restorative systems with coatings: a randomized clinical trial in the field. Trials, 17, 239.
- Koopaeei, M. M., Inglehart, M. R., McDonald, N., Fontana, M. 2017. General dentists’, pediatric dentists’, and endodontists’ diagnostic assessment and treatment strategies for deep carious lesions: a comparative analysis. Journal of the American Dental Association, 148, 64–74.
- Marsh, P. D. 2006. Dental plaque as a biofilm and a microbial community – implications for health and disease. BMC Oral Health, 6, S14.
- Mazzoni, A., Tjaderhane, L., Checchi, V., Di Lenarda, R., Salo, T., Tay, F. R., et al. 2015. Role of dentin MMPs in caries progression and bond stability. Journal of Dental Research, 94, 241–51.
- McCaffery, M. 1968. Nursing Practice Theories Related to Cognition, Bodily Pain, and Man–Environment Interactions. Los Angeles, CA: University of California at Los Angeles Students’ Store.
- Narbutaite, J., Maciulskiene, V., Splieth, C., Innes, N. P., Santamaria, R. M. 2014. Acceptability of three different caries treatment methods for primary molars among Lithuanian children. 12th Congress of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry: “A Passion for Paediatric Dentistry”, 5–8 June 2014. Sopot, Poland.
- Oong, E. M., Griffin, S. O., Kohn, W. G., Gooch, B. F., Caufield, P. W. 2008. The effect of dental sealants on bacteria levels in caries lesions. Journal of the American Dental Association, 139, 271–8.
- Pitts, N., Chadwick, B., Anderson, T. 2015. Children's Dental Health Survey Report 2: Dental Disease and Damage in Children: England, Wales and Northern Ireland. London: Health and Social Care Information Centre.
- Ricketts, D., Lamont, T., Innes, N. P., Kidd, E., Clarkson, J. E. 2013. Operative caries management in adults and children. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD003808.
- Rodd, H. D., Boissonade, F. M. 2001. Innervation of human tooth pulp in relation to caries and dentition type. Journal of Dental Research, 80, 389–93.
- Santamaria, R. M., Innes, N. P., Machiulskiene, V., Evans, D. J., Splieth, C. H. 2014. Caries management strategies for primary molars: 1-yr randomized control trial results. Journal of Dental Research, 93, 1062–9.
- Santamaria, R. M., Innes, N. P., Machiulskiene, V., Schmoeckel, J., Alkilzy, M., Splieth, C. 2017. Alternative caries management options for primary molars: 2.5-yr outcomes of a randomised clinical trial. Caries Research, 51(6), 605–14.
- Schwendicke, F., Stolpe, M. 2014. Direct pulp capping following a carious exposure versus root canal treatment: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Journal of Endodontics, 40(11), 1764–70.
- Schwendicke, F., Dörfer, C. E., Paris, S. 2013. Incomplete caries removal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Dental Research, 92, 306–14.
- Schwendicke, F., Kern, M., Meyer-Lueckel, H., Boels, A., Doerfer, C., Paris, S. 2014a. Fracture resistance and cuspal deflection of incompletely excavated teeth. Journal of Dentistry, 42, 107–13.
- Schwendicke, F., Paris, S., Stolpe, M. 2014b. Cost-effectiveness of caries excavations in different risk groups – a micro-simulation study. BMC Oral Health, 14, 153.
- Schwendicke, F., Paris, S., Tu, Y. 2015a. Effects of using different criteria and methods for caries removal: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Journal of Dentistry, 43(1), 1–15.
- Schwendicke, F., Stolpe, M., Innes, N. 2015b. Conventional treatment, Hall Technique or immediate pulpotomy for carious primary molars: a cost-effectiveness analysis. International Endodontic Journal, 49(9), 817–26.
- Schwendicke, F., Tu, Y. K., Hsu, L. Y., Göstemeyer, G. 2015c. Antibacterial effects of cavity lining: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Journl of Dentistry, 43, 1298–307.
- Schwendicke, F., Frencken, J. E., Bjorndal, L., Maltz, M., Manton, D. J., Ricketts, D. N. J., et al. 2016. Managing carious lesions: consensus recommendations on carious tissue removal. Advances in Dental Research, 28(2), 58–67.
- Shepherd, M. A., Nadanovsky, P., Sheiham, A. 1999. Dental public health: the prevalence and impact of dental pain in 8-year-old school children in Harrow, England. British Dental Journal, 187, 38–41.
- Tonmukayakul, U., Martin, R., Clark, R., Brownbill, J., Manton, D., Hall, M. 2015. Protocol for the Hall Technique study: a trial to measure clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of stainless steel crowns for dental caries restoration in primary molars in young children. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 44, 36–41.