CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF FAILED ADAPTATION TO BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
THE ROLE OF ECOLOGICAL CONSTRAINTS
Jennifer A. Lau
Kellogg Biological Station and Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, 3700 E. Gull Lake Dr., Hickory Corners, MI, 49060 USA
Search for more papers by this authorCasey P. terHorst
Department of Biology, California State University, Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA, 91330-8303 USA
Search for more papers by this authorJennifer A. Lau
Kellogg Biological Station and Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, 3700 E. Gull Lake Dr., Hickory Corners, MI, 49060 USA
Search for more papers by this authorCasey P. terHorst
Department of Biology, California State University, Northridge, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA, 91330-8303 USA
Search for more papers by this authorSpencer C. H. Barrett
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Willcocks Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3B2 Canada
Search for more papers by this authorRobert I. Colautti
Department of Biology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6 Canada
Search for more papers by this authorKatrina M. Dlugosch
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona, PO Box 210088, Tucson, AZ, 85721 USA
Search for more papers by this authorLoren H. Rieseberg
Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, 1316–6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4 Canada
Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405 USA
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
Biological invasions are a major challenge to native communities and have the potential to exert strong selection on native populations. As a result, native taxa may adapt to the presence of invaders through increased competitive ability, increased antipredator defences or altered morphologies that may limit encounters with toxic prey. Yet, in some cases, species may fail to adapt to biological invasions. Many challenges to adaptation arise because biological invasions occur in complex species-rich communities in spatially and temporally variable environments. Here, we review these ‘ecological’ constraints on adaptation, focusing on the complications that arise from the need to simultaneously adapt to multiple biotic agents and from temporal and spatial variation in both selection and demography. Throughout, we illustrate cases where these constraints might be especially important in native populations faced with biological invasions. Our goal was to highlight additional complexities empiricists should consider when studying adaptation to biological invasions and to begin to identify conditions when adaptation may fail to be an effective response to invasion.
REFERENCES
- Agrawal AA, Sherriffs MF (2001) Induced plant resistance and susceptibility to late-season herbivores of wild radish. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 94, 71–75.
- Antonovics J (1976) The nature of limits to natural selection. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 63, 224–247.
- Baker HG (1965) Characteristics and modes of origin of weeds. In: The Genetics of Colonizing Species (eds HG Baker, GL Stebbins), pp. 147–168. Academic Press, New York.
- Bell G (2013) Evolutionary rescue and the limits of adaptation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 368, 20120080.
- Bell G, Gonzalez A (2011) Adaptation and evolutionary rescue in metapopulations experiencing environmental deterioration. Science, 332, 1327–1330.
- Benard MF (2006) Survival trade-offs between two predator-induced phenotypes in Pacific treefrogs (Pseudacris regilla). Ecology, 87, 340–346.
- Benkman CW (2013) Biotic interaction strength and the intensity of selection. Ecology Letters, 16, 1054–1060.
- Bodbyl Roels SA, Kelly JK (2011) Rapid evolution caused by pollinator loss in Mimulus guttatus . Evolution, 65, 2541–2552.
- Bourdeau PE, Pangle KL, Peacor SD (2011) The invasive predator Bythotrephes induces changes in the vertical distribution of native copepods in Lake Michigan. Biological Invasions, 13, 2533–2545.
- Bourne EC, Bocedi G, Travis JMJ, Pakeman RJ, Brooker RW, Schiffers K (2014) Between migration load and evolutionary rescue: dispersal, adaptation and the response of spatially structured populations to environmental change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 281, 20132795.
- Bradshaw AD (1991) The Croonian Lecture, 1991: genostasis and the limits to evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 333, 289–305.
- Bürger R, Lynch M (1995) Evolution and extinction in a changing environment: a quantitative genetic analysis. Evolution, 49, 151–163.
- Callaway RM, Ridenour WM (2004) Novel weapons: invasive success and the evolution of increased competitive ability. Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, 2, 436–443.
- Charmantier A, Garant D (2005) Environmental quality and evolutionary potential: lessons from wild populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 272, 1415–1425.
- Colautti RI, Lau JA (2015) Contemporary evolution during invasion: evidence for differentiation, natural selection, and local adaptation. Molecular Ecology, 24, 1999–2017.
- Darwin C (1859) On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. John Murray, London.
- Dukes JS, Mooney HA (1999) Does global change increase the success of biological invaders? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14, 135–139.
- Fritts TH, Rodda GH (1998) The role of introduced species in the degradation of island ecosystems: a case history of Guam. Annual Review of Ecology & Systematics, 29, 113–140.
- Gartside DW, McNeilly T (1974) The potential for evolution of heavy metal tolerance in plants II. Copper tolerance in normal populations of different plant species. Heredity, 32, 335–348.
- Gomulkiewicz R, Holt RD (1995) When does evolution by natural selection prevent extinction. Evolution, 49, 201–207.
- Gonzalez A, Ronce O, Ferriere R, Hochberg ME (2013) Evolutionary rescue: an emerging focus at the intersection between ecology and evolution. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 368, 20120404.
- Grant PR, Grant BR (2002) Unpredictable evolution in a 30-year study of Darwin's finches. Science, 296, 707–711.
- Holloway GJ, Povey SR, Sibly RM (1990) The effect of new environment on adapted genetic architecture. Heredity, 64, 323–330.
- terHorst CP (2010) Evolution in response to direct and indirect effects in pitcher plant inquiline communities. American Naturalist, 176, 675–685.
- Irwin RE, Adler LS, Brody AK (2004) The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense. Ecology, 85, 1503–1511.
- Kawecki TJ (2008) Adaptation to marginal habitats. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution & Systematics, 39, 321–342.
- Kingsolver JG, Diamond SE (2011) Phenotypic selection in natural populations: what limits directional selection? American Naturalist, 177, 346–357.
- Kingsolver JG, Diamond SE, Siepielski AM, Carlson SM (2012) Synthetic analyses of phenotypic selection in natural populations: lessons, limitations, and future directions. Evolutionary Ecology, 26, 1101–1118.
- Lankau RA (2012) Coevolution between invasive and native plants driven by chemical competition and soil biota. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109, 11240–11245.
- Lankau RA, Nodurft RN (2013) An exotic invader drives the evolution of plant traits that determine mycorrhizal fungal diversity in a native competitor. Molecular Ecology, 22, 5472–5485.
- Lankau RA, Nuzzo V, Spyreas G, Davis AS (2009) Evolutionary limits ameliorate the negative impact of an invasive plant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 15362–15367.
- Lau JA (2006) Evolutionary responses of native plants to novel community members. Evolution, 60, 56–63.
- Lau JA (2008) Beyond the ecological: biological invasions alter natural selection on a native plant species. Ecology, 89, 1023–1031.
- Lau JA, Strauss SY (2005) Insect herbivores drive important indirect effects of exotic plants on native communities. Ecology, 86, 2990–2997.
- Leger EA (2008) The adaptive value of remnant native plants in invaded communities: an example from the Great Basin. Ecological Applications, 18, 1226–1235.
- Lenormand T (2002) Gene flow and the limits to natural selection. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 183–189.
- Levin DA (1990) The seed bank as a source of genetic novelty in plants. American Naturalist, 135, 563–572.
-
Lynch M, Lande R (1993) Evolution and extinction in response to environmental change. In: Biotic Interactions and Global Change (eds PM Kareiva, JG Kingsolver, RB Huey), pp. 234–250. Sunderland, MA, Sinauer.
10.2307/5293 Google Scholar
- Menge BA (1995) Indirect effects in marine rocky intertidal interactions webs: patterns and importance. Ecological Monographs, 65, 21–74.
- Miller TE, Travis J (1996) The evolutionary role of indirect effects in communities. Ecology, 77, 1329–1335.
- Morrissey MB, Hadfield JD (2012) Directional selection in temporally replicated studies is remarkably consistent. Evolution, 66, 435–442.
- Oduor AMO (2013) Evolutionary responses of native plant species to invasive plants: a review. New Phytologist, 200, 986–992.
- Phillips BL, Shine R (2006) An invasive species induces rapid adaptive change in a native predator: cane toads and black snakes in Australia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 273, 1545–1550.
- Phillips BL, Shine R (2004) Adapting to an invasive species: toxic cane toads induce morphological change in Australian snakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 49, 17150–17155.
- Pilson D (2000) Herbivory and natural selection on flowering phenology in wild sunflower, Helianthus annuus . Oecologia, 122, 72–82.
- Powell KI, Chase JM, Knight TM (2013) Invasive plants have scale-dependent effects on diversity by altering species-area relationships. Science, 339, 316–318.
- Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. American Naturalist, 132, 652–661.
- Reimchen TE, Nosil P (2002) Temporal variation in divergent selection on spine number in threespine stickleback. Evolution, 56, 2472–2483.
- Rice KJ, Emery NC (2003) Managing microevolution: restoration in the face of global change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1, 469–478.
- Richards CL, Bossdorf O, Muth NZ, Gurevitch J, Pigliucci M (2006) Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions. Ecology Letters, 9, 981–993.
- Ronce O, Kirkpatrick M (2001) When sources become sinks: migrational meltdown in heterogeneous habitats. Evolution, 55, 1520–1531.
- Rowe CLJ, Leger EA (2011) Competitive seedlings and inherited traits: a test of rapid evolution of Elymus multisetus (big squirreltail) in response to cheatgrass invasion. Evolutionary Applications, 4, 485–498.
- Schemske DW, Horvitz CC (1989) Temporal variation in selection on a floral character of a Neotropical herb. Evolution, 43, 461–464.
- Siepielski AM, DiBattista JD, Carlson SM (2009) It's about time: the temporal dynamics of phenotypic selection in the wild. Ecology Letters, 12, 1261–1276.
- Siepielski AM, Gotanda KM, Morrissey MB, Diamond SE, DiBattista JD, Carlson SM (2013) The spatial patterns of directional phenotypic selection. Ecology Letters, 16, 1382–1392.
- Strauss SY (1991) Indirect effects in community ecology: their definition, study and importance. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 6, 206–210.
- Strauss SY (2014) Ecological and evolutionary responses in complex communities: implications for invasions and eco-evolutionary feedbacks. Oikos, 123, 257–266.
- Strauss SY, Irwin RE (2004) Ecological and evolutionary consequences of multispecies plant-animal interactions. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 35, 435–466.
- Strauss SY, Lau JA, Carroll SP (2006a) Evolutionary responses of natives to introduced species: what do introductions tell us about natural communities? Ecology Letters, 9, 357–374.
- Strauss SY, Webb CO, Salamin N (2006b) Exotic taxa less related to native species are more invasive. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 5841–5845.
- Templeton AR, Levin DA (1979) Evolutionary consequences of seed pools. American Naturalist, 114, 232–249.
- terHorst CP (2010) Evolution in response to direct and indirect ecological effects in pitcher plant inquiline communities. American Naturalist, 176, 675–685.
- terHorst CP, Lau JA, Cooper IA, Keller KR, La Rosa RJ, Royer AM, Schultheis EH, Suwa T, Conner JK (2015) Quantifying nonadditive selection caused by indirect ecological effects. Ecology, 96, 2360–2369.
- Thompson JN (1997) Evaluating the dynamics of coevolution among geographically structured populations. Ecology, 78, 1619–1623.
- Thompson JN, Nuismer SL, Gomulkiewicz R (2002) Coevolution and maladaptation. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 42, 381–387.
- Thomson DM (2005) Matrix models as a tool for understanding invasive plant and native plant interactions. Conservation Biology, 19, 917–928.
- Thomson DM (2006) Detecting the effects of introduced species: a case study of competition between Apis and Bombus . Oikos, 114, 407–418.
- Turelli M, Schemske DW, Bierzychudek P (2001) Stable two-allele polymorphisms maintained by fluctuating fitnesses and seed banks: protecting the blues in Linanthus parryae . Evolution, 55, 1283–1298.
- Vanhoenacker D, Ågren J, Ehrlén J (2013) Non-linear relationship between intensity of plant-animal interactions and selection strength. Ecology Letters, 16, 198–205.
- Venable DL, Brown JS (1988) The selective interactions of dispersal, dormancy, and seed size as adaptations for reducing risk in variable environments. American Naturalist, 131, 360–384.
- Walsh MR (2013) The evolutionary consequences of indirect effects. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28, 23–29.
- Walsh B, Blows MW (2009) Abundant genetic variation + strong selection = multivariate genetic constraints: a geometric view of adaptation. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, & Systematics, 40, 41–59.
- White EM, Wilson JC, Clarke AR (2006) Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology. Diversity and Distributions, 12, 443–455.
- Williamson MH, Fitter A (1996) The characters of successful invaders. Biological Conservation, 78, 163–170.
- Wilson AJ, Pemberton JM, Pilkington JG et al. (2006) Environmental coupling of selection and heritability limits evolution. PLOS Biology, 4, 1270–1275.
- Wise MJ, Rausher MD (2013) Evolution of resistance to a multiple-herbivore community: Genetic correlations, diffuse coevolution, and constraints on the plant's response to selection. Evolution, 67, 1767–1779.
- Wootton JT (1994) The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 25, 443–466.