Stability and Change in Corporate Governance
Gerald F. Davis
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJohan S. G. Chu
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this authorGerald F. Davis
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this authorJohan S. G. Chu
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Corporate governance describes the process that allocates power and resources within organizations and the societal institutions that shape how they look, how they make decisions, and how the proceeds from their activities are divided. Research and theory traditionally focused on the institutions that overcome the separation of ownership and control created by dispersed shareholdings. Critics noted that this problem was distinctively American, and that corporate governance is shaped by history, culture, and power. We describe several domains for productive future research that is comparative, historical, and attentive to power dynamics.
References
- Amable, B. (2003). The diversity of modern capitalism. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Berle, A., & Means, G. C. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York, NY: MacMillan.
- Blair, M. M. (1995). Ownership and control: Re-thinking corporate governance for the twenty-first century. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
-
Callon, M. (1998). Introduction: The embeddedness of economic markets in economics. In M. Callon (Ed.), The laws of the markets (pp. 1–57). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
10.1111/j.1467-954X.1998.tb03468.x Google Scholar
- Chu, J. S. G. (2012). Who killed the inner circle? The end of the era of the corporate interlock network. Unpublished, The University of Michigan.
- Coffee, J. C. (2006). Gatekeepers: The role of the professions in corporate governance. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Davis, G. F. (2009). Managed by the markets: How finance reshaped America. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Davis, G. F. (2013). After the corporation. Politics & Society, 41, 283–308.
-
Davis, G. F., & Marquis, C. (2005). The globalization of stock markets and convergence in corporate governance. In R. Swedberg & V. Nee (Eds.), The economic sociology of capitalism (pp. 352–390). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9780691217932-017 Google Scholar
- Davis, G. F., & Stout, S. K. (1992). Organization theory and the market for corporate control: A dynamic analysis of the characteristics of large takeover targets, 1980–1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 605–633.
-
Davis, G. F., Yoo, M., & Baker, W. E. (2003). The small world of the American corporate elite, 1982–2001. Strategic Organization, 1(3), 301–326.
10.1177/14761270030013002 Google Scholar
- Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93, 1155–1177.
- Fama, E., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law & Economics, 26, 301–325.
- Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2004). The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 501–534.
- Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
- Kaysen, C. (1957). The social significance of the modern corporation. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings), 47, 311–319.
- La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1113–1155.
-
La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization, 14, 222–282.
10.1093/jleo/15.1.222 Google Scholar
- Malkiel, B. G. (1996). A random walk down Wall Street. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
- Manne, H. G. (1965). Mergers and the market for corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 73, 110–120.
-
Marris, R. (1964). The economic theory of “managerial” capitalism. New York, NY: Free Press.
10.1007/978-1-349-81732-0 Google Scholar
- Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
-
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511808678 Google Scholar
- Rajan, R. G., & Zingales, L. (2003). The great reversals: The politics of financial development in the 20th century. Journal of Financial Economics, 69, 5–50.
- Romano, R. (1993). The genius of American corporate law. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press.
-
Roy, W. G. (1997). Socializing capital: The rise of the large industrial corporation in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400822270 Google Scholar
- Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52, 737–783.
- Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968). Constructing social theories. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
- Useem, M. (1984). The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the US and the UK. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
- Useem, M. (1996). Investor capitalism: How money managers are changing the face of corporate America. New York, NY: Basic.
- Vogus, T. J., & Davis, G. F. (2005). Elite mobilizations for antitakeover legislation, 1982–1990. In G. F. Davis, D. MacAdam, W. R. Scott & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Weber, K., Davis, G. F., & Lounsbury, M. (2009). Policy as myth and ceremony? The global spread of stock exchanges, 1980–2005. Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1319–1347. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.47085184
- Westphal, J. D., & Poonam, K. (2003). Keeping directors in line: Social distancing as a control mechanism in the corporate elite. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 361–398.
Browse other articles of this reference work: