Positive Development among Diverse Youth

Development
Developmental Processes
Richard M. Lerner

Richard M. Lerner

Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mary H. Buckingham

Mary H. Buckingham

Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Robey B. Champine

Robey B. Champine

Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kathleen N. Greenman

Kathleen N. Greenman

Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel J. A. Warren

Daniel J. A. Warren

Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Michelle B. Weiner
First published: 15 May 2015
Citations: 1

Abstract

The positive youth development (PYD) perspective is based on the notion that all young people possess strengths and the capacity for healthy growth. The key hypothesis within the PYD perspective is that thriving occurs when the strengths of youth are aligned across adolescence with ecological resources (or “assets”) that promote positive, healthy development (e.g., assets such as high-quality parenting, mentoring, teaching, or coaching; effective youth development programs; or opportunities for youth to participate in and take leadership of valued family, school, and community activities). The 4-H Study of PYD has sought to bring data to bear on these ideas about the individual and ecological bases of PYD. We discuss several findings derived from tests of the model of PYD forwarded by Lerner and Lerner, including the structure of PYD, its antecedents in youth strengths and ecological developmental assets, and both positive and problematic outcomes among youth. The results of the 4-H Study of PYD provide important insights into how individual and contextual factors coalesce to promote adolescent thriving.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.