Political Inequality
Abstract
In the classical model of democracy, governments are responsive to the mass public, making public policies favored by a majority of citizens while respecting the rights of minorities. In the real world, of course, no political system, democratic or otherwise, has ever fully realized this principle of political equality. The focus of this essay is an examination of research on how economic inequalities impact democratic politics. The question has become especially pressing as economic inequality has risen, in some countries quite dramatically, in recent decades. Political inequality may refer to either differential inputs into policymaking processes, in which some actors have more influence than others, or it can refer to policy outputs, in particular those which encourage or sustain income and wealth inequality. In this essay, I review four contemporary theories of political inequality (elite and oligarchic models, power resources theories, globalization models, and participatory inequality models). Each throws light on some aspects of political inequality, but none provides a completely satisfactory account. I conclude with some suggestions for future directions for research.
References
-
Alesina, A., & Glaser, E. (2004). Fighting poverty in the U.S. and Europe: A world of difference. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/0199267669.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Ansolabehere, S., de Figueiredo, J., & Snyder, J. (2003). Why is there so little money in U.S. politics? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 17, 105–130.
-
Arts, W., & Gelissen, J. (2010). Models of the welfare state. In F. Castles, S. Leibfried, J. Lewis, H. Obinger & C. Pierson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the welfare state (pp. 569–583). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199579396.003.0039 Google Scholar
- Bartels, L. (2008). Unequal democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Baumgartner, F., Berry, J., Hojnacki, M., Kimball, D. C., & Leech, B. (2009). Lobbying and policy change: Who wins, who loses, and why. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226039466.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Block, F. (1987). Revising state theory. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Bourdieu, P. (1998). The state nobility. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
- Brady, D. (2010). Rich democracies, poor people: How politics explain poverty. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
-
Burstein, P. (2014). American public opinion, advocacy, and policy in Congress. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9781139628723 Google Scholar
- Clawson, D., Neustadtl, A., & Weller, M. (1998). Dollars and votes: How business campaign contributions subvert democracy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Dahl, R. (1998). On democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Domhoff, G. W. (2010). Who rules America? New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Franklin, M. (2004). Voter turnout and the dynamics of electoral competition in established democracies since 1945. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511616884 Google Scholar
- Galbraith, J. (1952). American capitalism: The theory of countervailing power. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
- Garfinkel, I., Smeeding, T., & Rainwater, L. (2010). Wealth and the welfare state. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
-
Garrett, G. (1998). Partisan politics in the global economy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511625633 Google Scholar
- Gilens, M. (2012). Affluence and influence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Gough, I., & Therborn, G. (2010). The global future of welfare states. In F. Castles, S. Leibfried, J. Lewis, H. Obinger & C. Pierson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the welfare state (pp. 703–720). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Hacker, J., & Pierson, P. (2010). Winner-take-all politics. New York, NY: Simon and Shuster.
- Hacker, J., & Pierson, P. (2005). Off-center: The republican revolution and the erosion of American democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Hayes, C. (2010). Twilight of the elites. New York, NY: Metropolitan Books.
- Iversen, T. (2010). Democracy and capitalism. In F. Castles, S. Leibfried, J. Lewis, H. Obinger & C. Pierson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the welfare state (pp. 183–195). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Kahn, S. (2009). Privilege. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Kelly, N. (2009). The politics of income inequality. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511576225 Google Scholar
- Korpi, W. (1983). The democratic class struggle. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
-
Leighley, J., & Nagler, J. (2013). Who votes now?: Demographics, issues, inequality, and turnout in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.23943/princeton/9780691159348.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Lijphart, A. (1997). Unequal participation: Democracy's unresolved dilemma. American Political Science Review, 91, 1–14.
- Lindblom, C. (1977). Politics and markets. New York, NY: Basic Books.
- Lipset, S. M. (1981 [1960]). Political man ( Expanded ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
- McCarty, N., Poole, K., & Rosenthal, H. (2006). Polarized America: The dance of ideology and unequal riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- McKay, A. (2012). Buying policy? The effects of lobbyists' resources on their policy success. Political Research Quarterly, 65, 908–23.
- Michels, R. (1966 [1911]). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchic tendencies in modern democracy. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.
- Mills, C. W. (1956). The power elite. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
-
Mizruchi, M. (2013). The fracturing of the American corporate elite. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/harvard.9780674075368 Google Scholar
- Offe, C. (1985). Disorganized capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Pareto, V. (1968 [1901]). The rise and fall of the elites: An application of theoretical sociology. Totowa, NJ: Bedminster Press.
-
P. Pierson (Ed.) (2001). The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/0198297564.001.0001 Google Scholar
-
Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/9780674369542 Google Scholar
- Pontusson, J. (2005). Inequality and prosperity: Social Europe versus liberal America. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
- Przeworski, A., & Wallerstein, M. (1988). Structural dependence of the state on capital. American Political Science Review, 82, 11–29.
- Ross, M. (2006). Is democracy good for the poor? American Journal of Political Science, 50, 860–74.
-
Scholzman, K., Verba, S., & Brady, H. (2012). The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400841912 Google Scholar
- Shapiro, I. (2002). Why the poor don't soak the rich: Notes on democracy and distribution. Daedalus, 130, 118–28.
-
Silver, B. (2003). Forces of labor. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511615702 Google Scholar
- D. Soskice, & P. Hall (Eds.) (2001). Varieties of capitalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Streeck, W. (2012). Buying time: The delayed crisis of democratic capitalism. London, England: Verso.
- Swank, D. (2006). Tax policy in an era of internationalization: Explaining the spread of neoliberalism. International Organization, 60, 847–882.
- Swank, D. (2010). Globalization. In F. Castles, S. Leibfried, J. Lewis, H. Obinger & C. Pierson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the welfare state (pp. 318–330). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Therborn, G. (2008). From marxism to post-marxism? London, England: Verso.
- Useem, M. (1984). The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of business political activity in the U.S. and U.K. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Wallerstein, M., & Western, B. (2000). Unions in decline? What has changed and why. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 355–77.
-
Winters, J. (2011). Oligarchy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511793806 Google Scholar
- Zweigenhaft, R., & Domhoff, G. W. (2006). Diversity in the power elite: How it happened, why it matters. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Further Reading
- Howard, C. (2008). The welfare state nobody knows. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
-
Huber, E., & Stephens, J. (2001). Development and crisis of the welfare state: Parties and policies in global markets. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226356495.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Iversen, T., & Cusack, T. (2000). The causes of welfare state expansion: Deindustrialization or globalization? World Politics, 52, 313–349.
- Krippner, G. (2010). Capitalizing on crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
-
P. Pierson, & T. Skocpol (Eds.) (2007). The transformation of American politics: Activist government and the rise of conservatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
10.1515/9781400837502 Google Scholar
-
Rosenfeld, J. (2014). What unions no longer do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.4159/harvard.9780674726215 Google Scholar
Browse other articles of this reference work: